Skip to main content
The British Journal of Cancer. Supplement logoLink to The British Journal of Cancer. Supplement
. 1984;6:103–106.

Indications for an inducible component of error-prone DNA repair in yeast.

W Siede, F Eckardt
PMCID: PMC2149159  PMID: 6365134

Abstract

In a thermoconditional mutant of mutagenic DNA repair (rev 2ts = rad 5-8) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae recovery of survival and mutation frequencies can be monitored by incubating UV-irradiated cells in growth medium at a permissive temperature (23 degrees C) before plating and a shift to restrictive temperature (36 degrees C). Inhibition of protein synthesis with cycloheximide during incubation at permissive conditions blocks this REV 2 dependent recovery process in stationary phase rev 2ts cells, whereas it can be reduced but not totally abolished in exponentially growing cells. These results indicate a strict dependence on post-irradiation protein synthesis in stationary phase cells and argue for a considerable constitutive level and only limited inducibility in logarithmic phase cells. The UV inducibility of the REV 2 coded function in stationary phase cells could be confirmed by analysis of the dose-response pattern of the his 5-2 reversion: in stationary phase rev 2ts cells, the quadratic component of the biphasic linear-quadratic induction kinetics found at 23 degrees C, which is interpreted as the consequence of induction of mutagenic repair, is eliminated at 36 degrees C.

Full text

PDF
103

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Eckardt F., Teh S. J., Haynes R. H. Heteroduplex repair as an intermediate step of UV mutagenesis in yeast. Genetics. 1980 May;95(1):63–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haynes R. H., Eckardt F. Analysis of dose-response patterns in mutation research. Can J Genet Cytol. 1979 Sep;21(3):277–302. doi: 10.1139/g79-033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. James A. P., Kilbey B. J. The timing of UV mutagenesis in yeast: a pedigree analysis of induced recessive mutation. Genetics. 1977 Oct;87(2):237–248. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lawrence C. W., Christensen R. B. The mechanism of untargeted mutagenesis in UV-irradiated yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 1982;186(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00422904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schendel P. F. Inducible repair systems and their implications for toxicology. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1981 Mar;8(4):311–362. doi: 10.3109/10408448109089902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Siede W., Eckardt F., Brendel M. Analysis of mutagenic DNA repair in a thermoconditional repair mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Influence of cycloheximide on UV-irradiated stationary phase rev2ts cells. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;190(3):406–412. doi: 10.1007/BF00331068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Cancer. Supplement are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES