Skip to main content
The British Journal of Cancer. Supplement logoLink to The British Journal of Cancer. Supplement
. 1980 Apr;4:294–298.

Tumour size: a factor influencing the isoeffect analysis of tumour response to combined modalities.

D W Siemann
PMCID: PMC2149254  PMID: 6932939

Abstract

Isoeffect analysis of complete dose response curves can be used to study the interaction of agents in combined modality protocols. When such an analysis is applied to data from in vivo tumour model systems, the effects of the agents on factors such as tumour vasculature, growth or reoxygenation pattern also need to be considered. In this study the change in tumour size, which can occur during a long time-interval between agents, was used as an example of a factor which may influence the position of data points on an isoeffect plot. Assays of in vivo tumour growth delay and in vitro clonogenic survival were performed to demonstrate that the radiation response curves of EMT-6/Ro tumours were size dependent. These curves were used to illustrate that data points obtained from a combined modality treatment may fall outside of the envelope of additivity of an isoeffect plot, as a direct consequence of tumour growth. This finding indicates that it may not be possible to interpret the results from isoeffect analyses of in vivo data on the basis of cellular interactions between agents, and suggests that instead isoeffect analyses be applied primarily to assess the overall response of the tumour system.

Full text

PDF
294

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown J. M., Yu N. Y., Workman P. Pharmacokinetic considerations in testing hypoxic cell radiosensitizers in mouse tumours. Br J Cancer. 1979 Mar;39(3):310–320. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1979.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fu K. K., Phillips T. L., Wharam M. D. Radiation response of artificial pulmonary metastases of the EMT6 tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1976 Jan-Feb;1(3-4):257–260. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(76)90047-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rockwell S. C., Kallman R. F., Fajardo L. F. Characteristics of a serially transplanted mouse mammary tumor and its tissue-culture-adapted derivative. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972 Sep;49(3):735–749. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Siemann D. W., Hill R. P., Bush R. S. The importance of the pre-irradiation breathing times of oxygen and carbogen (5% CO2: 95% O2) on the in vivo radiation response of a murine sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1977 Sep-Oct;2(9-10):903–911. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(77)90188-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stanley J. A., Peckham M. J., Steel G. G. Influence of tumour size on radiosensitization by misonidazole. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1978 Jun;3:220–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanley J. A., Shipley W. U., Steel G. G. Influence of tumour size on hypoxic fraction and therapeutic sensitivity of Lewis lung tumour. Br J Cancer. 1977 Jul;36(1):105–113. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1977.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Cancer. Supplement are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES