Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1998 Jun;77(11):2045–2047. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.340

No association between a polymorphism in the steroid metabolism gene CYP17 and risk of breast cancer.

A M Dunning 1, C S Healey 1, P D Pharoah 1, N A Foster 1, J M Lipscombe 1, K L Redman 1, D F Easton 1, N E Day 1, B A Ponder 1
PMCID: PMC2150340  PMID: 9667690

Abstract

A recent study showed an association between a single base substitution, T-->C, in the promotor region of the CYP17 gene, the risk of breast cancer and age at menarche in Asian, African-American and Latino women from California and Hawaii. The C allele was associated with increased risk of breast cancer, significantly so for patients presenting with advanced disease, whereas the TT genotype was associated with later age at menarche in control subjects. We attempted to confirm these findings in a large case-control study in East Anglia, England (835 cases and 591 control subjects). We found no evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.37] or advanced breast cancer (OR 0.88, CI 0.38-2.01) in C allele carriers, nor any association between age at menarche and genotype. We conclude that these alleles do not significantly alter breast cancer risk in the English population.

Full text

PDF
2045

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Easton D. F., Peto J., Babiker A. G. Floating absolute risk: an alternative to relative risk in survival and case-control analysis avoiding an arbitrary reference group. Stat Med. 1991 Jul;10(7):1025–1035. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Feigelson H. S., Coetzee G. A., Kolonel L. N., Ross R. K., Henderson B. E. A polymorphism in the CYP17 gene increases the risk of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1997 Mar 15;57(6):1063–1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kelsey J. L., Gammon M. D., John E. M. Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(1):36–47. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Riboli E., Kaaks R. The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 (Suppl 1):S6–14. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES