In this paper, we concluded that removal of the SV5 F protein cytoplasmic tail (F tail or FΔ19) caused a block in fusion promotion at the hemifusion stage. Further examination, using more modern and sophisticated procedures involving double labeling and fluorescent dyes of different sizes, has shown that, although the F tail mutant is severely destabilized in the formation of syncytia relative to wild-type F protein, the F tail mutant is capable of promoting the transfer of a small aqueous dye, suggesting that a small fusion pore opens. Thus, the mutant is not blocked at the hemifusion stage. (Dutch, R.E., and R.A. Lamb. 2001. J. Virol. 75:5363–5369.)
. 2001 Jun 25;153(7):1519.
Correction
© 2000 The Rockefeller University Press
This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
PMCID: PMC2150729
This corrects the article "Truncation of the COOH-terminal region of the paramyxovirus SV5 fusion protein leads to hemifusion but not complete fusion" in volume 135 on page 73.