Abstract
The physician must act as primary medical advisor on behalf of the patient. Because the basis of prevention is epidemiology, problems of validity in the epidemiologic literature ought to be recognized by the primary medical advisor, so that he may optimize prevention. This article addresses the question of validity from the standpoint of the material, analysis, and interpretation. Validity of the material is discussed from four main points of reference: the diagnostic criteria of the disease, selection biases, misclassification of exposure, and control group relevance. Validity of the analysis is considered from the standpoint of the etiologic hypothesis; the notion of the “expected minimum analysis” is discussed. The three main aspects of this are the control of confounders, the introduction of test-variables, and the concept of refinement of the independent and dependent variables. Validity of interpretation is presented as a function of the introduction of test-variables. A relevant analysis may help discriminate between alternate interpretations, defined as the inverse path relationship, the confounded relationship, and the common cause pathway.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blot W. J., Winn D. M., Fraumeni J. F., Jr Oral cancer and mouthwash. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Feb;70(2):251–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janerich D. T., Burnett W. S., Feck G., Hoff M., Nasca P., Polednak A. P., Greenwald P., Vianna N. Cancer incidence in the Love Canal area. Science. 1981 Jun 19;212(4501):1404–1407. doi: 10.1126/science.7233229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janerich D. T., Glebatis D. M., Dugan J. M. Benign breast disease and oral contraceptive use. JAMA. 1977 May 16;237(20):2199–2201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolata G. B. Love Canal: false alarm caused by botched study. Science. 1980 Jun 13;208(4449):1239–1242. doi: 10.1126/science.7375934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labarthe D. R. Methodologic variation in case-control studies of reserpine and breast cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacMahon B., Yen S., Trichopoulos D., Warren K., Nardi G. Coffee and cancer of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):630–633. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peto R., Doll R., Buckley J. D., Sporn M. B. Can dietary beta-carotene materially reduce human cancer rates? Nature. 1981 Mar 19;290(5803):201–208. doi: 10.1038/290201a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rothman K. J. Induction and latent periods. Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Aug;114(2):253–259. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sackett D. L. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):51–63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shy K. K., McTiernan A. M., Daling J. R., Weiss N. S. Oral contraceptive use and the occurrence of pituitary prolactinoma. JAMA. 1983 Apr 22;249(16):2204–2207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spitzer W. O., Shenker S. C., Hill G. B. Cancer in a Montreal suburb: the investigation of a nonepidemic. Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Nov 15;127(10):971–974. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stavraky K. M., Clarke E. A. Hospital or population controls? An unanswered question. J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(4):301–307. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- THOMSON A. M. Diet in pregnancy. 3. Diet in relation to the course and outcome of pregnancy. Br J Nutr. 1959;13:509–525. doi: 10.1079/bjn19590065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wynder E. L., Kabat G., Rosenberg S., Levenstein M. Oral cancer and mouthwash use. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Feb;70(2):255–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]