Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1984 Jul;159(1):368–374. doi: 10.1128/jb.159.1.368-374.1984

Chemosensory and thermosensory excitation in adaptation-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli.

Y Imae, T Mizuno, K Maeda
PMCID: PMC215639  PMID: 6376476

Abstract

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein-methyltransferase-deficient mutants, cheR mutants, of Escherichia coli showed a tumble response to repellents only at low temperatures, and the resultant tumbling lasted unless the condition was changed. The swimming pattern of the repellent-treated cells was different at different temperatures, indicating that the absolute temperature is a determinant of the tumbling frequency of those cells. The tumbling of those cells was also suppressed by the addition of attractants. Under a suitable repellent concentration, the tumbling frequency of the cells was found to be simply determined by the ligand occupancy of chemoreceptors for many attractants. In a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein-methylesterase-deficient mutant, a cheB deletion mutant, the tumbling frequency was also determined by receptor occupancy of some attractants. These results indicate that in the adaptation-deficient mutants, sensory signals are produced in proportion to the amount of ligand-bound or of thermally altered receptors and transmitted to the flagellar motors without any modification. Thus, it is concluded that the adaptation system, namely, the methylation-demethylation system of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, is not concerned with the step of chemosensory or thermosensory excitation. A simple model is proposed to explain how the swimming pattern of the adaptation-deficient mutants is determined.

Full text

PDF
368

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aksamit R. R., Koshland D. E., Jr Identification of the ribose binding protein as the receptor for ribose chemotaxis in Salmonella typhimurium. Biochemistry. 1974 Oct 22;13(22):4473–4478. doi: 10.1021/bi00719a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Block S. M., Segall J. E., Berg H. C. Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1983 Apr;154(1):312–323. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.312-323.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block S. M., Segall J. E., Berg H. C. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90421-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd A., Simon M. Bacterial chemotaxis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1982;44:501–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.44.030182.002441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown D. A., Berg H. C. Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1388–1392. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke S., Koshland D. E., Jr Membrane receptors for aspartate and serine in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1979 Oct 10;254(19):9695–9702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goy M. F., Springer M. S., Adler J. Failure of sensory adaptation in bacterial mutants that are defective in a protein methylation reaction. Cell. 1978 Dec;15(4):1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goy M. F., Springer M. S., Adler J. Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: role of a protein methylation reaction in sensory adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4964–4968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hazelbauer G. L., Engström P., Harayama S. Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein III and transducer gene trg. J Bacteriol. 1981 Jan;145(1):43–49. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.1.43-49.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hedblom M. L., Adler J. Genetic and biochemical properties of Escherichia coli mutants with defects in serine chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1980 Dec;144(3):1048–1060. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.3.1048-1060.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kehry M. R., Dahlquist F. W. Adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: CheB-dependent modification permits additional methylations of sensory transducer proteins. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):761–772. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kondoh H., Ball C. B., Adler J. Identification of a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein for the ribose and galactose chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):260–264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maeda K., Imae Y., Shioi J. I., Oosawa F. Effect of temperature on motility and chemotaxis of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1976 Sep;127(3):1039–1046. doi: 10.1128/jb.127.3.1039-1046.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maeda K., Imae Y. Thermosensory transduction in Escherichia coli: inhibition of the thermoresponse by L-serine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):91–95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Matsuura S., Shioi J. I., Imae Y., Iida S. Characterization of the Bacillus subtilis motile system driven by an artificially created proton motive force. J Bacteriol. 1979 Oct;140(1):28–36. doi: 10.1128/jb.140.1.28-36.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oosawa K., Imae Y. Glycerol and ethylene glycol: members of a new class of repellents of Escherichia coli chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1983 Apr;154(1):104–112. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.104-112.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Parkinson J. S., Houts S. E. Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions. J Bacteriol. 1982 Jul;151(1):106–113. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.1.106-113.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Parkinson J. S., Revello P. T. Sensory adaptation mutants of E. coli. Cell. 1978 Dec;15(4):1221–1230. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rollins C., Dahlquist F. W. The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of E. coli: a repellent-stimulated, covalent modification, distinct from methylation. Cell. 1981 Aug;25(2):333–340. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sherris D., Parkinson J. S. Posttranslational processing of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6051–6055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Springer M. S., Goy M. F., Adler J. Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction. Nature. 1979 Jul 26;280(5720):279–284. doi: 10.1038/280279a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Springer M. S., Goy M. F., Adler J. Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: two complementary pathways of information processing that involve methylated proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3312–3316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Springer W. R., Koshland D. E., Jr Identification of a protein methyltransferase as the cheR gene product in the bacterial sensing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):533–537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spudich J. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):710–713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.2.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stock J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr A protein methylesterase involved in bacterial sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Aug;75(8):3659–3663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.8.3659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stock J. B., Maderis A. M., Koshland D. E., Jr Bacterial chemotaxis in the absence of receptor carboxylmethylation. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):37–44. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90358-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Szmelcman S., Schwartz M., Silhavy T. J., Boos W. Maltose transport in Escherichia coli K12. A comparison of transport kinetics in wild-type and lambda-resistant mutants as measured by fluorescence quenching. Eur J Biochem. 1976 May 17;65(1):13–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10383.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang E. A., Koshland D. E., Jr Receptor structure in the bacterial sensing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7157–7161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yonekawa H., Hayashi H., Parkinson J. S. Requirement of the cheB function for sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1983 Dec;156(3):1228–1235. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.3.1228-1235.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES