Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1976 Nov;26(172):817–821.

Rubella immunisation and contraception—a case for re-examining the policy of the Department of Health and Social Security

A J Rose, K F Mole
PMCID: PMC2158391  PMID: 1003390

Abstract

Now that immunisation against rubella is available, it would at first sight seem reasonable to identify all potential mothers susceptible to this disease and immunise them. Preliminary screening, however, carried out in order to restrict vaccination to seronegative subjects, not only serves no useful purpose, but is counter-productive.

Full text

PDF
817

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hambling M. H. Effect of a vaccination programme on the distribution of rubella antibodies in women of childbearing age. Lancet. 1975 May 17;1(7916):1130–1133. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92514-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mayon-White R. T., Bull M. J. Rubella antibody tests in family planning clinics. Practitioner. 1976 Mar;216(1293):317–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pearson J. F., Weaver J. B. Fetal activity and fetal wellbeing: an evaluation. Br Med J. 1976 May 29;1(6021):1305–1307. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6021.1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Skinner J. L., Skinner E. M., Enoch P. J., Varnam M. A. Rubella immunization in a group practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 Jan;22(114):18–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES