Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1978 May;28(190):283–286.

The reliability and validity of the age-sex register as a population denominator in general practice

Robin C Fraser
PMCID: PMC2158581  PMID: 702443

Abstract

I report evidence which raises doubts about the reliability and validity of age-sex registers as true population denominators in general practice in the UK. These have potentially disturbing implications for the interpretation of data based on the presumed precision of age-sex registers. I am undertaking a prospective study to identify and quantify sources of inaccuracy to try to establish a method of estimating the true population at risk and its true age-sex characteristics. This would greatly enhance the utility of the age-sex register as the most valuable tool in general-practice research.

Full text

PDF
283

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BACKETT E. M., HEADY J. A., EVANS J. C. Studies of a general practice. II. The doctor's job in an urban area. Br Med J. 1954 Jan 16;1(4854):109–115. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4854.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dawes K. S. Survey of general practice records. Br Med J. 1972 Jul 22;3(5820):219–223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5820.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fry J. Twenty-one years of general practice--changing patterns. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 Aug;22(121):521–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hannay D. R. Accuracy of health-centre records. Lancet. 1972 Aug 19;2(7773):371–373. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91748-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hannay D. R., Maddox E. J. Missing patients on a health centre file. Community Health (Bristol) 1977 May;8(4):210–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Irvine D., Jeffreys M. B.M.A. Planning Unit survey of general practice 1969. Br Med J. 1971 Nov 27;4(5786):535–543. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5786.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LEES D. S., COOPER M. H. A preliminary analysis of research into general practice. J Coll Gen Pract. 1963 May;6:233–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morrell D. C., Gage H. G., Robinson N. A. Patterns of demand in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1970 Jun;19(95):331–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pinsent R. J. The evolving age-sex register. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1968 Aug;16(2):127–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Richardson I. M., Dingwall-Fordyce I. Patient geography in general practice. Catchment areas of Aberdeen practices. Lancet. 1968 Dec 14;2(7581):1290–1293. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91779-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sloan R. E., Norman M., Adams D. The cost and advantages of establishing an age-sex register. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Sep;27(182):532–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Warren M. D. Identifying handicapped people in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Nov;26(172):828–836. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woods V., Nitecki D. E., Goodman J. W. The capacity of bifunctional antigens to bridge antibody molecules and to mediate cell cooperation. Immunochemistry. 1975 May;12(5):379–382. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(75)90004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES