Abstract
We studied clients seen by social workers in two settings, one a conventional intake team in a social services department and another where clients were referred to social workers attached to a primary health care team.
In both groups a high proportion of clients were either physically ill or disabled and the attachment group had a high proportion of clients with mental ill health. A large proportion of both groups were elderly and in general they had similar characteristics.
However, clients referred to intake teams were more likely to be unemployed, to be living on benefits in council or rented accommodation, and to have had some contact with social services before. The attachment group consisted of more women who were either housewives or working, living on either their own earnings or their husbands', and were more likely to own their own homes and not to have had previous contact with social services.
Clients referred to attached social workers were more likely to have an emotional or relationship problem, and many had practical problems as well. The implication is that attachment schemes will tap a wider section of the community and that the additional clients will have as many and as severe problems as clients referred to intake teams.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cooper B. Social work in general practice: the Derby scheme. Lancet. 1971 Mar 13;1(7698):539–542. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91140-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corney R. H., Briscoe M. E. Social workers and their clients: a comparison between primary health care and local authority setting. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 May;27(178):295–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eastwood M. R., Trevelyan M. H. Relationship between physical and psychiatric disorder. Psychol Med. 1972 Nov;2(4):363–372. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700045177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzgerald R. The classification and recording of "social problems". Soc Sci Med. 1978 Jul;12(4A):255–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilchrist I. C., Gough J. B., Horsfall-Turner Y. R., Ineson E. M., Keele G., Marks B., Scott H. J. Social work in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 Nov;28(196):675–686. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harwin B. G., Cooper B., Eastwood M. R., Goldberg D. P. Prospects for social work in general practice. Lancet. 1970 Sep 12;2(7672):559–561. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)91360-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leach R. D. Prostatectomy at a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979 Nov;61(6):459–462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratoff L., Pearson B. Social case-work in general practice: an alternative approach. Br Med J. 1970 May 23;1(5707):475–477. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rickards C., Gildersleeve C., Fitzgerald R., Cooper B. The health of clients of a social service department. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Apr;26(165):237–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]