Skip to main content
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI logoLink to Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI
. 2007 Oct 17;14(12):1652–1654. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00365-07

Development of an Effective Whole-Spore Vaccine To Protect against Microsporidial Gill Disease in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by Using a Low-Virulence Strain of Loma salmonae

D J Speare 1,*, R J F Markham 1, N J Guselle 1
PMCID: PMC2168380  PMID: 17942613

Abstract

In determining the effective vaccine spore dose of a low-virulence strain of Loma salmonae to limit microsporidial gill disease in trout, we found that fish receiving 103 to 105 killed spores had the best protection against experimental infection, with 85% fewer xenomas in their gills than in the controls. Intraperitoneal delivery of the vaccine was effective, and the addition of adjuvant did not improve vaccine performance against this disease-causing microsporidian.


Microsporidial gill disease of salmonids (MGDS) is among the most significant infectious diseases affecting aquaculture-raised chinook salmon in Canada; the disease most often affects salmon in their second summer of marine cultivation when they are nearing market weight, and outbreaks can lead to a cumulative mortality rate exceeding 30% (3). Microsporidians are a diverse group of unicellular, obligate intracellular, highly reduced parasites of many types of animals. Once considered to be the most primitive eukaryotes, microsporidians are now considered to be highly specialized fungi whose life cycles include a proliferative merogonic stage, followed by a sporogonic stage resulting in small environmentally resistant infective spores (2). During MGDS, sporogony occurs within the pillar and endothelial cells of the gill. These cells undergo hypertrophy, forming a xenoma composed primarily of parasite spores. The rupture of the xenoma and the release of spores cause severe and persistent gill inflammation; affected fish display signs of anoxia (3). Clinical disease is correlated with the numbers of xenomas within the gills (14). Therapeutic drugs against microsporidia are rarely successful, and none are licensed for use in aquaculture; however, recent findings have demonstrated that a protective cell-mediated immune response can be evoked (7). A low-virulence strain of Loma salmonae (the SV strain) has been discovered (9), and in preliminary laboratory studies, salmonids receiving a single exposure to this strain developed resistance to the virulent OA strain (10). Here, we assess the efficacy of a vaccine developed from killed spores of the low-virulence SV strain with or without Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA).

Certified-disease-free rainbow trout (280 fish, 20 to 30 g each) were tagged and placed in eight treatment groups, including the control group (which received only a saline injection) and groups receiving various vaccine doses of 102 to 106 spores per fish with or without FIA (Table 1) administered by intraperitoneal injection. SV strain spores for the vaccine were collected from the gills of experimentally infected brook trout and killed by freezing (8). Six weeks following vaccination, the fish were exposed to L. salmonae (the virulent OA strain) by oral exposure to xenoma-laden gill material acquired from a group of previously infected trout (6). Following this challenge, the trout were randomly sampled at weeks 6, 7, 8, and 9; they were euthanized, and the second gill arch on the right side of each fish was removed. This fresh gill material was examined with a dissecting microscope, and the xenomas were counted (15). The mean xenoma counts per gill arch (XCPGA) were compared between groups by use of one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's multiple-comparison test (STATA version 8; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Differences were considered significant at the 0.05 level of probability. In addition, vaccine-associated XCPGA reduction was expressed in proportion to the XCPGA of the control fish as follows: % reduction = 1 − [(XCPGA vaccinated)/(XCPGAcontrol)] × 100. Separate control groups were used to confirm that the frozen spores were no longer viable and that the water flowing into the experimental system was not contaminated with L. salmonae.

TABLE 1.

XCPGA reduction in vaccinated trout compared to control (saline-injected) trout at various weeks postexposure to the OA strain of L. salmonae

Vaccine group dose Vaccine-associated XCPGA reduction (%) at wka:
6 7 8 9
102 spores 37 77 93 96
103 spores 93 93 67 92
104 spores 88 92 97 95
104 spores + FIA 91 97 92 97
105 spores 95 96 83 91
106 spores 69 96 57 95
106 spores + FIA 86 92 77 66
a

Eight fish were examined at each sampling period for each treatment group.

Following exposure of the vaccinated trout to the challenge OA strain of L. salmonae, the XCPGA peaked at week 6 and declined in all groups by week 9 (Fig. 1), making week 6 the best point of comparison to assess the vaccine's effects. Significantly fewer xenomas developed in those fish vaccinated at several spore dose ranges (103 to 105 spores without adjuvant and 105 with adjuvant) (Fig. 1). Higher doses with or without adjuvant were less effective. The vaccine-associated XCPGA exceeded 85% in groups vaccinated with 103 to 105 spores per fish (Table 1).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Mean XCPGA for vaccinated and control trout at various weeks after experimental challenge with the OA strain of L. salmonae. Results for groups marked with an asterisk are significantly different (P < 0.05) from those for the control group for that week. Eight fish were examined at each sampling period for each treatment group. IP, intraperitoneal.

To date, although parasitic diseases are common in aquaculture, no parasite vaccines are commercially available. Instead, antiparasitic pharmaceuticals are used, and this raises concerns about drug residues as these fish enter the human food supply (13). Although some recent advances in discovering chemotherapeutic agents against MGDS have been made, none have shown the degree of XCPGA reduction noted herein for vaccination (16). The current study demonstrates the efficacy of a killed-whole-spore vaccine preparation with a known spore dose against MGDS utilizing a recently discovered low-virulence strain of L. salmonae. Previous work foreshadowed the efficacy of this approach. Salmonids which have recovered from experimental MGDS infections, as well as those immunized with live spores of either the virulent or low-virulence strains of L. salmonae, develop a cell-mediated immune response which becomes protective against infection by 4 weeks after exposure (8). Immunity appears to block the transfer of the parasite to the gill (11) by ablating the infection during merogony within subendocardial macrophages. In the current trial, although low numbers of xenomas did form on the gills of fish vaccinated with killed spores, the dramatic reduction in xenomas is important and would markedly reduce the likelihood of clinical expression of this disease even when the fish are reared in regions where MGDS is endemic. Given that L. salmonae is endemic within the marine coastal environment where salmon are raised in net pens (4), a vaccine administered during the freshwater hatchery phase of cultivation is recommended.

Until recently, despite safety concerns, conventional killed or modified pathogens were the only vaccines licensed for commercial use with farmed salmon (1). The use of whole spores as the basis for vaccine preparation is a relatively simple approach which is also being pursued for active immunization against Encephalitozoon microsporidial infections of mammals (12). In the case of MGDS, spores are easily harvested and purified from the gills of infected fish, and the use of a killed low-virulence strain of this parasite as the basis for the vaccine reduces the risks associated with its use. Although several studies have demonstrated humoral responses of fish and mammals to various microsporidian infections (5, 12), the MGDS vaccine is the first developed against a disease-causing microsporidian.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 17 October 2007.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Carrington, A. C., and C. J. Secombes. 2006. A review of CpGs and their relevance to aquaculture. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 112:87-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keeling, P. J., and N. M. Fast. 2002. Microsporidia: biology and evolution of highly reduced intracellular parasites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:93-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kent, M. L., and D. J. Speare. 2005. Review of the sequential development of Loma salmonae (Microsporidia) based on experimental infections with rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha). Folia Parasitol. 52:1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kent, M. L., G. S. Traxler, D. Kieser, J. Richard, S. C. Dawe, R. W. Shaw, G. Prosperi-Porta, J. Ketcheson, and T. P. T. Evelyn. 1998. Survey of salmonid pathogens in ocean-caught fishes in British Columbia, Canada. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 10:211-219. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leiro, J., M. Ortega, J. Estevez, M. T. Santamarina, M. L. Sanmartin, and F. M. Ubeira. 1996. The humoral immune response of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L., to spore-surface antigens of microsporidian parasites. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 55:235-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramsay, J. M., D. J. Speare, J. G. Sanchez, and J. Daley. 2001. The transmission potential of Loma salmonae (Microspora) in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), is dependent upon the method and timing of exposure. J. Fish Dis. 24:453-460. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rodriguez-Tovar, L. E., R. J. F. Markham, D. J. Speare, and J. Sheppard. 2006. Cellular immunity in salmonids infected with the microsporidial parasite Loma salmonae or exposed to non-viable spores. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 114:72-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rodriguez-Tovar, L. E., J. A. Becker, R. J. F. Markham, and D. J. Speare. 2006. Induction time for resistance to microsporidial gill disease caused by Loma salmonae following vaccination of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with a spore-based vaccine. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 21:170-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sanchez, J. G., D. J. Speare, R. J. F. Markham, and S. R. M. Jones. 2001. Isolation of a Loma salmonae variant: biological characteristics and host range. J. Fish Biol. 59:427-441. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sanchez, J. G., D. J. Speare, R. J. F. Markham, and S. R. M. Jones. 2001. Experimental vaccination of rainbow trout against Loma salmonae using a live low-virulence variant of L. salmonae. J. Fish Biol. 59:442-448. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sanchez, J. G., D. J. Speare, and R. J. F. Markham. 2001. Altered tissue distribution of Loma salmonae: effects of natural and acquired resistance. J. Fish Dis. 24:33-40. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sobottka, I., F. Igluaer, T. Schuler, C. Schmetz, G. S. Visvesvara, J. Albrecht, D. A. Schwartz, N. J. Pieniazek, K. Bartscht, R. Laufs, and J. Schottelius. 2001. Acute and long-term humoral immunity following active immunization of rabbits with inactivated spores of various Encephalitozoon species. Parasitol. Res. 87:1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sommerset, I., B. Krossoy, E. Biering, and P. Frost. 2005. Vaccines for fish in aquaculture. Expert Rev. Vaccines 4:89-191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Speare, D. J., G. Ritter, and H. Schmidt. 1998. Quinine hydrochloride treatment delays xenoma formation and dissolution in rainbow trout challenged with Loma salmonae. J. Comp. Pathol. 119:459-465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Speare, D. J., H. J. Beaman, and J. Daley. 1999. Effect of water temperature manipulation on a thermal unit predictive model for Loma salmonae. J. Fish Dis. 22:277-283. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Speare, D. J., F. Athanassopoulou, F. Daley, and J. G. Sanchez. 1999. A preliminary investigation of alternatives to fumagillin for the treatment of Loma salmonae infection in rainbow trout. J. Comp. Pathol. 121:241-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES