Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1998 Mar;64(3):339–343. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.3.339

Cognitive complaints in patients after whiplash injury: the impact of malingering

B Schmand 1, J Lindeboom 1, S Schagen 1, R Heijt 1, T Koene 1, H Hamburger 1
PMCID: PMC2169999  PMID: 9527145

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—The validity of memory and concentration complaints that are often reported after a whiplash trauma is controversial. The prevalence of malingering or underperformance in post-whiplash patients, and its impact on their cognitive test results were studied.
METHODS—The Amsterdam short term memory (ASTM) test, a recently developed malingering test, was used as well as a series of conventional memory and concentration tests. The study sample was a highly selected group of patients, who were examined either as part of a litigation procedure (n=36) or in the normal routine of an outpatient clinic (n=72).
RESULTS—The prevalence of underperformance, as defined by a positive score on the malingering test, was 61% (95% CI: 45-77) in the context of litigation, and 29% (95% CI: 18-40) in the outpatient clinic (p=0.003). Furthermore, the scores on the memory and concentration test of malingering post-whiplash patients (n=43) and non-malingering post-whiplash patients (n=65) were compared with the scores of patients with closed head injury (n=20) and normal controls (n=46). The malingering post-whiplash patients scored as low as the patients with closed head injury on most tests.
CONCLUSIONS—The prevalence of malingering or cognitive underperformance in late post-whiplash patients is substantial, particularly in litigation contexts. It is not warranted to explain the mild cognitive disorders of whiplash patients in terms of brain damage, as some authors have done. The cognitive complaints of non-malingering post-whiplash patients are more likely a result of chronic pain, chronic fatigue, or depression.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bayer T. L. Weaving a tangled web: the psychology of deception and self deception in psychogenic pain. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(5):517–527. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90368-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernard L. C. Prospects for faking believable memory deficits on neuropsychological tests and the use of incentives in simulation research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990 Oct;12(5):715–728. doi: 10.1080/01688639008401014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Binder L. M., Rohling M. L. Money matters: a meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury. Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jan;153(1):7–10. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassens G., Wolfe L., Zola M. The neuropsychology of depressions. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1990 Spring;2(2):202–213. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2.2.202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Stefano G., Radanov B. P. Course of attention and memory after common whiplash: a two-years prospective study with age, education and gender pair-matched patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995 May;91(5):346–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb07019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ettlin T. M., Kischka U., Reichmann S., Radii E. W., Heim S., Wengen D., Benson D. F. Cerebral symptoms after whiplash injury of the neck: a prospective clinical and neuropsychological study of whiplash injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;55(10):943–948. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.10.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haines M. E., Norris M. P. Detecting the malingering of cognitive deficits: an update. Neuropsychol Rev. 1995 Jun;5(2):125–148. doi: 10.1007/BF02208438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moss-Morris R., Petrie K. J., Large R. G., Kydd R. R. Neuropsychological deficits in chronic fatigue syndrome: artifact or reality? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 May;60(5):474–477. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.5.474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Olsnes B. T. Neurobehavioral findings in whiplash patients with long-lasting symptoms. Acta Neurol Scand. 1989 Dec;80(6):584–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1989.tb03931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Otte A., Ettlin T., Fierz L., Mueller-Brand J. Parieto-occipital hypoperfusion in late whiplash syndrome: first quantitative SPET study using technetium-99m bicisate (ECD). Eur J Nucl Med. 1996 Jan;23(1):72–74. doi: 10.1007/BF01736993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pearce J. M. Polemics of chronic whiplash injury. Neurology. 1994 Nov;44(11):1993–1997. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.11.1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Radanov B. P., Di Stefano G., Schnidrig A., Sturzenegger M., Augustiny K. F. Cognitive functioning after common whiplash. A controlled follow-up study. Arch Neurol. 1993 Jan;50(1):87–91. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540010081022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Radanov B. P., Dvorak J. Spine update. Impaired cognitive functioning after whiplash injury of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Feb 1;21(3):392–397. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199602010-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Radanov B. P., Sturzenegger M., Di Stefano G. Long-term outcome after whiplash injury. A 2-year follow-up considering features of injury mechanism and somatic, radiologic, and psychosocial findings. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995 Sep;74(5):281–297. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199509000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schagen S., Schmand B., de Sterke S., Lindeboom J. Amsterdam Short-Term Memory test: a new procedure for the detection of feigned memory deficits. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Feb;19(1):43–51. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schrader H., Obelieniene D., Bovim G., Surkiene D., Mickeviciene D., Miseviciene I., Sand T. Natural evolution of late whiplash syndrome outside the medicolegal context. Lancet. 1996 May 4;347(9010):1207–1211. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smed A. Cognitive function and distress after common whiplash injury. Acta Neurol Scand. 1997 Feb;95(2):73–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES