Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1998 Apr;64(4):505–509. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.4.505

Measurement of the retinal nerve fibre layer with scanning laser polarimetry in patients with previous demyelinating optic neuritis

D Steel 1, A Waldock 1
PMCID: PMC2170052  PMID: 9576544

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Subjective visual deficits are common after demyelinating optic neuritis despite the frequent return of normal visual acuity. Visual and electrodiagnostic tests have demonstrated evidence of these persisting functional abnormalities, which are thought to be secondary to demyelination and variable axonal loss in the optic nerve. Scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) is a new image analysis technique which uses the polarising properties of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) to produce a quantitative measure of its thickness. This study was carried out to assess the prevalence, extent, and pattern of RNFL loss after demyelinating optic neuritis using SLP.
METHODS—Twenty four patients with a history of previous demyelinating optic neuritis were re-examined. Examination included measurement of logmar visual acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and the presence of a relative afferent pupil defect and optic atrophy. SLP was performed and a mean RNFL profile from a series of three images from each eye was constructed. This was compared with normative data from 20 age matched normal subjects. The lower 99.9% confidence limit of the normal data was calculated and used as the cut off criterion for abnormality.
RESULTS—There were a total of 31 eyes with a history of demyelinating optic neuritis and SLP disclosed an abnormality in 29 (94%) of these. Twenty three eyes recovered an acuity of 0.0 or better, 21 of which had evidence of RNFL loss on polarimetry. Scanning laser polarimetry was the only abnormality found in nine of the 31 eyes (29%). The pattern and extent of RNFL loss was very variable and there was no significant difference in these indices between patients with multiple sclerosis compared with those with isolated demyelinating optic neuritis.
CONCLUSION—Scanning laser polarimetry can provide a quantitative measure of RNFL loss after demyelinating optic neuritis, demonstrating its occurrence in a high percentage of patients recovering normal visual acuity.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (104.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Elbøl P., Work K. Retinal nerve fiber layer in multiple sclerosis. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990 Aug;68(4):481–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1990.tb01680.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frisén L., Hoyt W. F. Insidious atrophy of retinal nerve fibers in multiple sclerosis. Funduscopic identification in patients with and without visual complaints. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974 Aug;92(2):91–97. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1974.01010010097001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heinrichs I. H., McLean D. R. Evolution of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1988 Nov;15(4):394–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hely M. A., McManis P. G., Walsh J. C., McLeod J. G. Visual evoked responses and ophthalmological examination in optic neuritis. A follow-up study. J Neurol Sci. 1986 Oct;75(3):275–283. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(86)90075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kerrison J. B., Flynn T., Green W. R. Retinal pathologic changes in multiple sclerosis. Retina. 1994;14(5):445–451. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199414050-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MacFadyen D. J., Drance S. M., Douglas G. R., Airaksinen P. J., Mawson D. K., Paty D. W. The retinal nerve fiber layer, neuroretinal rim area, and visual evoked potentials in MS. Neurology. 1988 Sep;38(9):1353–1358. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.9.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Niessen A. G., Van Den Berg T. J., Langerhorst C. T., Greve E. L. Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment by scanning laser polarimetry and standardized photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;121(5):484–493. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75422-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Poser C. M., Paty D. W., Scheinberg L., McDonald W. I., Davis F. A., Ebers G. C., Johnson K. P., Sibley W. A., Silberberg D. H., Tourtellotte W. W. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227–231. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Quigley H. A., Addicks E. M. Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 May;100(5):807–814. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030811018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Quigley H. A., Dunkelberger G. R., Green W. R. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 May 15;107(5):453–464. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90488-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rubin G. S., Adamsons I. A., Stark W. J. Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;111(1):56–61. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090010060027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sanders E. A., Volkers A. C., van der Poel J. C., van Lith G. H. Estimation of visual function after optic neuritis: a comparison of clinical tests. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986 Dec;70(12):918–924. doi: 10.1136/bjo.70.12.918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanders E. A., Volkers A. C., van der Poel J. C., van Lith G. H. Visual function and pattern visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987 Aug;71(8):602–608. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.8.602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson H. S., Corbett J. J., Cox T. A. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol. 1981 Jul-Aug;26(1):39–42. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(81)90124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Trobe J. D., Beck R. W., Moke P. S., Cleary P. A. Contrast sensitivity and other vision tests in the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;121(5):547–553. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75429-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weinreb R. N., Shakiba S., Sample P. A., Shahrokni S., van Horn S., Garden V. S., Asawaphureekorn S., Zangwill L. Association between quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement and visual field loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Dec;120(6):732–738. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72726-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weinreb R. N., Shakiba S., Zangwill L. Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 May;119(5):627–636. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70221-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES