Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1998 May;64(5):619–623. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.5.619

Investigating individual subjects and screening populations for asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be harmful

C Whitty 1, C Sudlow 1, C Warlow 1
PMCID: PMC2170073  PMID: 9598677

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Trials suggesting that carotid endarterectomy in individual subjects with asymptomatic carotid stenosis reduces stroke risk have led to calls for screening. This study aimed to determine which groups might be harmed and which might benefit from a screening programme, and also to identify which individual subjects identified as positive for severe asymptomatic stenosis by carotid ultrasound are appropriate to put forward for further tests or procedures.
METHODS—A probability model was used to estimate the outcomes of three screening strategies: carotid ultrasound followed by catheter angiography, or by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or ultrasound alone, followed by carotid endarterectomy if severe stenosis is detected. Information from the current literature was used to estimate sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and MRA, risks of angiography and endarterectomy, and risk reduction after surgery for severe stenosis. For each strategy over a range of possible prevalences of severe asymptomatic stenosis, overall benefit to harm ratio was calculated, and number of strokes or deaths prevented or caused per 10 000 subjects screened.
RESULTS—At the prevalence of carotid stenosis found in the general population (<1%) screening will cause more strokes than it prevents, even using the most optimistic published figures. Only at prevalences of over 20% are significant benefits seen, and then only in centres with high test sensitivity and specificity and very low angiographic and surgical risk. Groups with such a high prevalence have not yet been reliably identified. Screening individual subjects from high prevalence groups would have limited public health impact, with at best about 100 strokes prevented for every 10 000 screened at 20% prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS—Investigating asymptomatic individual subjects for carotid stenosis may be harmful except in high prevalence groups. There is insufficient information about which these groups are, and at present screening cannot be recommended. Acting on a positive carotid ultrasound test in individual subjects without well defined risk factors for severe stenosis is unjustified and potentially dangerous.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blakeley D. D., Oddone E. Z., Hasselblad V., Simel D. L., Matchar D. B. Noninvasive carotid artery testing. A meta-analytic review. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Mar 1;122(5):360–367. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-5-199503010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bots M. L., Breslau P. J., Briët E., de Bruyn A. M., van Vliet H. H., van den Ouweland F. A., de Jong P. T., Hofman A., Grobbee D. E. Cardiovascular determinants of carotid artery disease. The Rotterdam Elderly Study. Hypertension. 1992 Jun;19(6 Pt 2):717–720. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.6.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brott T., Thalinger K. The practice of carotid endarterectomy in a large metropolitan area. Stroke. 1984 Nov-Dec;15(6):950–955. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.6.950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chambers B. R., Norris J. W. Outcome in patients with asymptomatic neck bruits. N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 2;315(14):860–865. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610023151404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellis M. R., Franks P. J., Cuming R., Powell J. T., Greenhalgh R. M. Prevalence, progression and natural history of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: is there a place for carotid endarterectomy? Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992 Mar;6(2):172–177. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80236-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fabris F., Zanocchi M., Bo M., Fonte G., Poli L., Bergoglio I., Ferrario E., Pernigotti L. Carotid plaque, aging, and risk factors. A study of 457 subjects. Stroke. 1994 Jun;25(6):1133–1140. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.6.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday A. W., Thomas D., Mansfield A. The Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST). Rationale and design. Steering Committee. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1994 Nov;8(6):703–710. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80650-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hobson R. W., 2nd, Weiss D. G., Fields W. S., Goldstone J., Moore W. S., Towne J. B., Wright C. B. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):221–227. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Horn M., Michelini M., Greisler H. P., Littooy F. N., Baker W. H. Carotid endarterectomy without arteriography: the preeminent role of the vascular laboratory. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994 May;8(3):221–224. doi: 10.1007/BF02018167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Irvine C. D., Baird R. N., Lamont P. M., Davies A. H. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1113–1114. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klop R. B., Eikelboom B. C. Why asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses should be screened. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1992;81(2):209–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moneta G. L., Edwards J. M., Papanicolaou G., Hatsukami T., Taylor L. M., Jr, Strandness D. E., Jr, Porter J. M. Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1995 Jun;21(6):989–994. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70228-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Leary D. H., Polak J. F., Kronmal R. A., Kittner S. J., Bond M. G., Wolfson S. K., Jr, Bommer W., Price T. R., Gardin J. M., Savage P. J. Distribution and correlates of sonographically detected carotid artery disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The CHS Collaborative Research Group. Stroke. 1992 Dec;23(12):1752–1760. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.12.1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prati P., Vanuzzo D., Casaroli M., Di Chiara A., De Biasi F., Feruglio G. A., Touboul P. J. Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in a general population. Stroke. 1992 Dec;23(12):1705–1711. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.12.1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rothwell P. M., Slattery J., Warlow C. P. A systematic comparison of the risks of stroke and death due to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis. Stroke. 1996 Feb;27(2):266–269. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.2.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sutton-Tyrrell K., Alcorn H. G., Wolfson S. K., Jr, Kelsey S. F., Kuller L. H. Predictors of carotid stenosis in older adults with and without isolated systolic hypertension. Stroke. 1993 Mar;24(3):355–361. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.3.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tell G. S., Polak J. F., Ward B. J., Kittner S. J., Savage P. J., Robbins J. Relation of smoking with carotid artery wall thickness and stenosis in older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) Collaborative Research Group. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2905–2908. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Warlow C. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? Lancet. 1995 May 20;345(8960):1254–1255. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90920-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Willeit J., Kiechl S. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993 May;13(5):661–668. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.13.5.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES