Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1998 Aug;65(2):196–203. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.2.196

Reversal of hypoaesthesia by nerve block, or placebo: a psychologically mediated sign in chronic pseudoneuropathic pain patients

R Verdugo 1, J Ochoa 1
PMCID: PMC2170207  PMID: 9703170

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To gain understanding of the mechanism and meaning of improvement of hypoaesthesia after a diagnostic intervention, and of the nature of the population that displays such a sign.
METHODS—Patients with chronic "neuropathic" pain underwent rigorous clinical and laboratory investigations, including placebo controlled local anaesthetic block. Patients displaying profound regional cutaneous hypoaesthesia and pain entered the study through either of two criteria: (a) reversal of hypoaesthesia after diagnostic block, (b) nerve injury as the cause of hypoaesthesia and pain. The semeiology displayed by these patients together with the behaviour of their sensory phenomena in response to blocks were compared. Three groups were expected: (1) patients with "neuropathic" pain with profound hypoaesthesia reversed by block, but without neuropathy; (2) patients whose hypoaesthesia did not reverse and who had neuropathy as the cause of their sensory dysfunction; and (3) patients whose hypoaesthesia reversed, and had neuropathy.
RESULTS—Two groups emerged: (1) patients with profound hypoaesthesia reversed by block, but without neuropathy (27 patients), and (2) patients whose hypoaesthesia did not reverse and who had a neuropathy (13 patients). No patient with neuropathy was found whose cutaneous hypoaesthesia improved with block. The first group displayed the sensory-motor characteristics of psychogenic pseudoneuropathy. The semeiology of the second group was in keeping with organic neuropathy and displayed no pseudoneurological features. Spontaneous pain was relieved by placebo in 66.6% of the patients in group1 and 53.8% in group 2.
CONCLUSIONS—Such reversal of hypoaesthesia is due to a placebo effect, acting on a psychogenic symptom because: (a) 27 of 27 patients in which the sign occurred had absence of nerve disease behind the "neuropathic" symptoms, (b) In 26 of 27 patients the area of hypoaesthesia was non-anatomical, (c) 16 of 27 patients had other sensory-motor signs that could not be explained as a result of organic pathology (give way weakness and punctual denial of hypoaesthesia), and (d) the phenomenon was not found in patients with organic neuropathy.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler R. H., Zlot S., Hürny C., Minder C. Engel's "Psychogenic Pain and the Pain-Prone Patient:" a retrospective, controlled clinical study. Psychosom Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;51(1):87–101. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Callaghan M., Sternbach R. A., Nyquist J. K., Timmermans G. Changes in somatic sensitivity during transcutaneous electrical analgesia. Pain. 1978 Aug;5(2):115–127. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(78)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Derbyshire S. W., Jones A. K., Devani P., Friston K. J., Feinmann C., Harris M., Pearce S., Watson J. D., Frackowiak R. S. Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Oct;57(10):1166–1172. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.10.1166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ENGEL G. L. Psychogenic pain and pain-prone patient. Am J Med. 1959 Jun;26(6):899–918. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(59)90212-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FELLNER C. H. Tranquilizing drugs in general practice or the triumph of the impure placebo. Am Pract Dig Treat. 1958 Aug;9(8):1265–1268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fields H. L. Sources of variability in the sensation of pain. Pain. 1988 May;33(2):195–200. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fishbain D. A., Goldberg M., Rosomoff R. S., Rosomoff H. Chronic pain patients and the nonorganic physical sign of nondermatomal sensory abnormalities (NDSA). Psychosomatics. 1991 Summer;32(3):294–303. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(91)72068-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fruhstorfer H., Lindblom U., Schmidt W. C. Method for quantitative estimation of thermal thresholds in patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976 Nov;39(11):1071–1075. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.39.11.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodge C. J., Jr, King R. B. Medical modification of sensation. J Neurosurg. 1976 Jan;44(1):21–28. doi: 10.3171/jns.1976.44.1.0021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindblom U., Meyerson B. A. Influence on touch, vibration and cutaneous pain of dorsal column stimulation in man. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):257–270. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90042-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindblom U., Verrillo R. T. Sensory functions in chronic neuralgia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979 May;42(5):422–435. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.5.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lipowski Z. J. Is "organic" obsolete? Psychosomatics. 1990 Summer;31(3):342–344. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(90)72173-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lipowski Z. J. Somatization: the concept and its clinical application. Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Nov;145(11):1358–1368. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.11.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Loh L., Nathan P. W., Schott G. D., Wilson P. G. Effects of regional guanethidine infusion in certain painful states. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 May;43(5):446–451. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.5.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marchettini P., Lacerenza M., Marangoni C., Pellegata G., Sotgiu M. L., Smirne S. Lidocaine test in neuralgia. Pain. 1992 Mar;48(3):377–382. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90087-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ochoa J. L. Essence, investigation, and management of "neuropathic" pains: hopes from acknowledgment of chaos. Muscle Nerve. 1993 Oct;16(10):997–1008. doi: 10.1002/mus.880161002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ochoa J. L. Pain mechanisms in neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol. 1994 Oct;7(5):407–414. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199410000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ochoa J. L. Reflex? Sympathetic? Dystrophy? Triple questioned again. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995 Nov;70(11):1124–1126. doi: 10.4065/70.11.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ochoa J. L., Yarnitsky D. Mechanical hyperalgesias in neuropathic pain patients: dynamic and static subtypes. Ann Neurol. 1993 May;33(5):465–472. doi: 10.1002/ana.410330509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pulst S. M., Haller P. Thermographic assessment of impaired sympathetic function in peripheral nerve injuries. J Neurol. 1981;226(1):35–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00313316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ron M. A. Somatisation in neurological practice. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Oct;57(10):1161–1164. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.10.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shorter E. Sucker-punched again! Physicians meet the disease-of-the-month syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Feb;39(2):115–118. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00119-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Trotter W., Davies H. M. Experimental studies in the innervation of the skin. J Physiol. 1909 Feb 9;38(2-3):134–246.1. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1909.sp001299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Verdugo R. J., Ochoa J. L. Use and misuse of conventional electrodiagnosis, quantitative sensory testing, thermography, and nerve blocks in the evaluation of painful neuropathic syndromes. Muscle Nerve. 1993 Oct;16(10):1056–1062. doi: 10.1002/mus.880161009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Verdugo R., Ochoa J. L. Quantitative somatosensory thermotest. A key method for functional evaluation of small calibre afferent channels. Brain. 1992 Jun;115(Pt 3):893–913. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.3.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Voiss D. V. Occupational injury. Fact, fantasy, or fraud? Neurol Clin. 1995 May;13(2):431–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. WALTERS A. Psychogenic regional pain alias hysterical pain. Brain. 1961 Mar;84:1–18. doi: 10.1093/brain/84.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Waddell G., McCulloch J. A., Kummel E., Venner R. M. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1980 Mar-Apr;5(2):117–125. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198003000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weintraub M. I. Regional pain is usually hysterical. Arch Neurol. 1988 Aug;45(8):914–915. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520320116025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES