Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1998 Nov;65(5):755–761. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.755

Motor evoked potentials in unilateral lingual paralysis after monohemispheric ischaemia

W Muellbacher 1, C Artner 1, B Mamoli 1
PMCID: PMC2170332  PMID: 9810951

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—The occurrence of a lingual paralysis after unilateral upper motor neuron lesions is an infrequent clinical phenomenon, and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. We studied the cortical motor representations of ipsilateral and contralateral lingual muscles in healthy controls and in a selected group of stroke patients, to clarify the variable occurrence of a lingual paralysis after recent monohemispheric ischaemia.
METHODS—A special bipolar surface electrode was used to record the ipsilateral and contralateral compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) from the lingual muscles after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex and peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) of the hypoglossal nerve medial to the angle of the jaw. Four patients with a lingual paralysis (group 1) and four patients with symmetric lingual movements (group 2) after monohemispheric first ever stroke were studied and compared with 40 healthy controls.
RESULTS—In controls, TMS of either hemisphere invariably produces CAMPs in the ipsilateral and contralateral lingual muscles, elicited through crossed and uncrossed central motor pathways, respectively. In the 40 healthy controls, TMS of either hemisphere elicited CMAPs of significantly greater amplitudes and shorter onset latencies from the contralateral muscles compared with the ipsilateral responses (p<0.0001). In the patient groups, TMS of the affected hemisphere failed to evoke any CMAP from either lingual side; TMS of the unsevered hemisphere always produced normal ipsilateral and contralateral responses, irrespective of whether the ipsilateral muscles were paralysed or not.
CONCLUSIONS—Bilateral crossed and uncrossed corticonuclear projections are invariably existent in humans. After unilateral interruption of these pathways, some people do exhibit a lingual paralysis whereas others do not. The development of a central lingual paralysis is most likely dependent on the ability of the unsevered hemisphere to utilise the pre-existent uncrossed motor projections. The variable availability of these pathways among individual subjects is in good agreement with the inconstant occurrence of a lingual paralysis after restricted monohemispheric lesions.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barker A. T., Jalinous R., Freeston I. L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106–1107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berardelli A., Inghilleri M., Cruccu G., Mercuri B., Manfredi M. Electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with corticospinal damage due to stroke or motor neurone disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Oct;81(5):389–396. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90028-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruccu G., Berardelli A., Inghilleri M., Manfredi M. Functional organization of the trigeminal motor system in man. A neurophysiological study. Brain. 1989 Oct;112(Pt 5):1333–1350. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.5.1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dominkus M., Grisold W., Jelinek V. Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for motor recovery in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;53(9):745–748. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.9.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durieu I., Leys D. La motricité linguale au cours des accidents vasculaires hémisphériques unilatéraux. Etude des afférences cortico-hypoglosses. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1994 Dec;150(12):844–849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fries W., Danek A., Witt T. N. Motor responses after transcranial electrical stimulation of cerebral hemispheres with a degenerated pyramidal tract. Ann Neurol. 1991 Jun;29(6):646–650. doi: 10.1002/ana.410290612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GUIOT G., SACHS M., HERTZOG E., BRION S., ROUGERIE J., DALLOZ J. C., NAPOLEONE F. Stimulation électrique et lésions chirurgicales de la capsule interne; déductions anatomiques et physiologiques. Neurochirurgie. 1959 Jan-Mar;5(1):17–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghika J., Bogousslavsky J., Regli F. Infarcts in the territory of the deep perforators from the carotid system. Neurology. 1989 Apr;39(4):507–512. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.4.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hess C. W., Mills K. R., Murray N. M. Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol. 1987 Jul;388:397–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holtzman R. N., Mark M. H., Wiener L. M., Minzer L. Lingual epilepsy: a case report of an unusual expression of focal cerebral discharge. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Mar;47(3):317–319. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.3.317-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lees A. J., Blau J. N., Schon F. Paroxysmal hemiglossal twisting. Lancet. 1986 Oct 4;2(8510):812–813. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90335-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leys D., Lejeune J. P., Bourgeois P., Blond S., Petit H. Syndrome pseudo-bulbaire aigu. Infarctus bilatéral de la jonction capsule interne corona radiata. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1985;141(12):814–818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Macdonell R. A., Donnan G. A., Bladin P. F. A comparison of somatosensory evoked and motor evoked potentials in stroke. Ann Neurol. 1989 Jan;25(1):68–73. doi: 10.1002/ana.410250111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer B. U., Liebsch R., Röricht S. Tongue motor responses following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex and proximal hypoglossal nerve in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;105(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(96)96598-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Muellbacher W., Mamoli B. The course of cortico-hypoglossal projections in the human brainstem: functional testing using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1997 Oct;120(Pt 10):1909–1914. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.10.1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Muellbacher W., Mathis J., Hess C. W. Electrophysiological assessment of central and peripheral motor routes to the lingual muscles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;57(3):309–315. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.3.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Neufeld M. Y., Blumen S. C., Nisipeanu P., Korczyn A. D. Lingual seizures. Epilepsia. 1988 Jan-Feb;29(1):30–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1988.tb05094.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oldfield R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schriefer T. N., Mills K. R., Murray N. M., Hess C. W. Evaluation of proximal facial nerve conduction by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jan;51(1):60–66. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.1.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Starkstein S. E., Berthier M., Leiguarda R. Bilateral opercular syndrome and crossed aphemia due to a right insular lesion: a clinicopathological study. Brain Lang. 1988 Jul;34(2):253–261. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90137-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Türk U., Rösler K. M., Mathis J., Müllbacher W., Hess C. W. Assessment of motor pathways to masticatory muscles: an examination technique using electrical and magnetic stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 1994 Nov;17(11):1271–1277. doi: 10.1002/mus.880171105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Urban P. P., Hopf H. C., Connemann B., Hundemer H. P., Koehler J. The course of cortico-hypoglossal projections in the human brainstem. Functional testing using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1996 Jun;119(Pt 3):1031–1038. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.3.1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Urban P. P., Hopf H. C., Fleischer S., Zorowka P. G., Müller-Forell W. Impaired cortico-bulbar tract function in dysarthria due to hemispheric stroke. Functional testing using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1997 Jun;120(Pt 6):1077–1084. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.6.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Willoughby E. W., Anderson N. E. Lower cranial nerve motor function in unilateral vascular lesions of the cerebral hemisphere. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 29;289(6448):791–794. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6448.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES