Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1981 Feb;145(2):990–1001. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.2.990-1001.1981

Aerotaxis in Salmonella typhimurium: role of electron transport.

D J Laszlo, B L Taylor
PMCID: PMC217209  PMID: 6257658

Abstract

Sensory transduction in aerotaxis required electron transport, in contrast to chemotaxis, which is independent of electron transport. Assays for aerotaxis were developed by employing spatial and temporal oxygen gradients imposed independently of respiration. By varying the step increase in oxygen concentration in the temporal assay, the dose-response relationship was obtained for aerotaxis in Salmonella typhimurium. A half-maximal response at 0.4 microM oxygen and inhibition by 5 mM KCN suggested that the "receptor" for aerotaxis is cytochrome o. The response was independent of adenosine triphosphate formation via oxidative phosphorylation but did correlate with changes in membrane potential monitored with the fluorescent cyanine dye diS-C3-(5). Nitrate and fumarate, which are alternative electron acceptors for the respiratory chain in S. typhimurium, inhibited aerotaxis when nitrate reductase and fumarate reductase were induced. These results support the hypothesis that taxis to oxygen, nitrate, and fumarate is mediated by the electron transport system and by changes in the proton motive force. Aerotaxis was normal in Escherichia coli mutants that were defective in the tsr, tar, or trg genes; in S. typhimurium, oxygen did not stimulate methylation of the products of these genes. A cheC mutant which shows an inverse response to chemoattractants also gave an inverse response to oxygen. Therefore, aerotaxis is transduced by a distinct and unidentified signally protein but is focused into the common chemosensory pathway before the step involving the cheC product. When S. typhimurium became anaerobic, the decreased proton motive force from glycolysis supported slow swimming but not tumbling, indicating that a minimum proton motive force was required for tumbling. The bacteria rapidly adapted to the anaerobic condition and resumed tumbling after about 3 min. The adaptation period was much shorter when the bacteria had been previously grown anaerobically.

Full text

PDF
990

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler J. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Science. 1966 Aug 12;153(3737):708–716. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3737.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler J. Effect of amino acids and oxygen on chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1966 Jul;92(1):121–129. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.1.121-129.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aswad D., Koshland D. E., Jr Isolation, characterization and complementation of Salmonella typhimurium chemotaxis mutants. J Mol Biol. 1975 Sep 15;97(2):225–235. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80036-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Azzi A. The use of fluorescent probes for the study of membranes. Methods Enzymol. 1974;32:234–246. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(74)32024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg H. C., Brown D. A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):500–504. doi: 10.1038/239500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CASTOR L. N., CHANCE B. Photochemical determinations of the oxidases of bacteria. J Biol Chem. 1959 Jun;234(6):1587–1592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Collins A. L., Stocker B. A. Salmonella typhimurium mutants generally defective in chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1976 Dec;128(3):754–765. doi: 10.1128/jb.128.3.754-765.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DeFranco A. L., Parkinson J. S., Koshland D. E., Jr Functional homology of chemotaxis genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1979 Jul;139(1):107–114. doi: 10.1128/jb.139.1.107-114.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drabikowska A. K. Electron transport system of Salmonella typhimurium cells. Acta Biochim Pol. 1970;17(2):89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Galloway R. J., Taylor B. L. Histidine starvation and adenosine 5'-triphosphate depletion in chemotaxis of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1980 Dec;144(3):1068–1075. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.3.1068-1075.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haddock B. A., Jones C. W. Bacterial respiration. Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):47–99. doi: 10.1128/br.41.1.47-99.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harayama S., Iino T. Phototaxis and membrane potential in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum. J Bacteriol. 1977 Jul;131(1):34–41. doi: 10.1128/jb.131.1.34-41.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hazelbauer G. L., Engström P. Parallel pathways for transduction of chemotactic signals in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1980 Jan 3;283(5742):98–100. doi: 10.1038/283098a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Khan S., Macnab R. M., DeFranco A. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Inversion of a behavioral response in bacterial chemotaxis: explanation at the molecular level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4150–4154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Khan S., Macnab R. M. Proton chemical potential, proton electrical potential and bacterial motility. J Mol Biol. 1980 Apr 15;138(3):599–614. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(80)80019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khan S., Macnab R. M. The steady-state counterclockwise/clockwise ratio of bacterial flagellar motors is regulated by protonmotive force. J Mol Biol. 1980 Apr 15;138(3):563–597. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(80)80018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koiwai O., Hayashi H. Studies on bacterial chemotaxis. IV. Interaction of maltose receptor with a membrane-bound chemosensing component. J Biochem. 1979 Jul;86(1):27–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koiwai O., Minoshima S., Hayashi H. Studies on bacterial chemotaxis. V. Possible involvement of four species of the methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein in chemotaxis of Escherichia coli. J Biochem. 1980 May;87(5):1365–1370. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a132876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kondoh H., Ball C. B., Adler J. Identification of a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein for the ribose and galactose chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):260–264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Larsen S. H., Adler J., Gargus J. J., Hogg R. W. Chemomechanical coupling without ATP: the source of energy for motility and chemotaxis in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1239–1243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MacGregor C. H., Bishop C. W. Do cytochromes function as oxygen sensors in the regulation of nitrate reductase biosynthesis? J Bacteriol. 1977 Jul;131(1):372–373. doi: 10.1128/jb.131.1.372-373.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Macnab R. M. Bacterial motility and chemotaxis: the molecular biology of a behavioral system. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1978;5(4):291–341. doi: 10.3109/10409237809177145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Macnab R., Koshland D. E., Jr Bacterial motility and chemotaxis: light-induced tumbling response and visualization of individual flagella. J Mol Biol. 1974 Apr 15;84(3):399–406. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90448-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maeda K., Imae Y. Thermosensory transduction in Escherichia coli: inhibition of the thermoresponse by L-serine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):91–95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Manson M. D., Tedesco P., Berg H. C., Harold F. M., Van der Drift C. A protonmotive force drives bacterial flagella. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):3060–3064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.3060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Matsura S., Shioi J., Imae Y. Motility in Bacillus subtilis driven by an artificial protonmotive force. FEBS Lett. 1977 Oct 15;82(2):187–190. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80581-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr Effects of cyanine dye membrane probes on cellular properties. Nature. 1978 Mar 2;272(5648):83–84. doi: 10.1038/272083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr Protonmotive force and bacterial sensing. J Bacteriol. 1980 Jan;141(1):26–32. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.1.26-32.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Miller J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr Sensory electrophysiology of bacteria: relationship of the membrane potential to motility and chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Nov;74(11):4752–4756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.4752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller S., Diehn B. Cytochrome c oxidase as the receptor molecule for chemoaccumulation (chemotaxis) of Euglena toward oxygen. Science. 1978 May 5;200(4341):548–549. doi: 10.1126/science.205948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Parkinson J. S. Novel mutations affecting a signaling component for chemotaxis of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1980 Jun;142(3):953–961. doi: 10.1128/jb.142.3.953-961.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Parkinson J. S. cheA, cheB, and cheC genes of Escherichia coli and their role in chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1976 May;126(2):758–770. doi: 10.1128/jb.126.2.758-770.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rice C. W., Hempfling W. P. Oxygen-limited continuous culture and respiratory energy conservation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1978 Apr;134(1):115–124. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.1.115-124.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ridgway H. G., Silverman M., Simon M. I. Localization of proteins controlling motility and chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1977 Nov;132(2):657–665. doi: 10.1128/jb.132.2.657-665.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rubik B. A., Koshland D. E., Jr Potentiation, desensitization, and inversion of response in bacterial sensing of chemical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):2820–2824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Silverman M., Simon M. Identification of polypeptides necessary for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1977 Jun;130(3):1317–1325. doi: 10.1128/jb.130.3.1317-1325.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sims P. J., Waggoner A. S., Wang C. H., Hoffman J. F. Studies on the mechanism by which cyanine dyes measure membrane potential in red blood cells and phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochemistry. 1974 Jul 30;13(16):3315–3330. doi: 10.1021/bi00713a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Springer M. S., Goy M. F., Adler J. Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction. Nature. 1979 Jul 26;280(5720):279–284. doi: 10.1038/280279a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Springer W. R., Koshland D. E., Jr Identification of a protein methyltransferase as the cheR gene product in the bacterial sensing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):533–537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Spudich J. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):710–713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.2.710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stock J. B., Koshland D. E., Jr A protein methylesterase involved in bacterial sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Aug;75(8):3659–3663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.8.3659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor B. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Intrinsic and extrinsic light responses of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1975 Aug;123(2):557–569. doi: 10.1128/jb.123.2.557-569.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Taylor B. L., Miller J. B., Warrick H. M., Koshland D. E., Jr Electron acceptor taxis and blue light effect on bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol. 1979 Nov;140(2):567–573. doi: 10.1128/jb.140.2.567-573.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thipayathasana P., Valentine R. The requirement for energy transducing ATPase for anaerobic motility in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Jun 28;347(3):464–468. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(74)90083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. VOGEL H. J., BONNER D. M. Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1956 Jan;218(1):97–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Waggoner A. S. Dye indicators of membrane potential. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1979;8:47–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.08.060179.000403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Warrick H. M., Taylor B. L., Koshland D. E., Jr Chemotactic mechanism of Salmonella typhimurium: preliminary mapping and characterization of mutants. J Bacteriol. 1977 Apr;130(1):223–231. doi: 10.1128/jb.130.1.223-231.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES