Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI), previously referred to as acute renal failure (ARF), represents a common and devastating problem in clinical medicine. Despite significant improvements in therapeutics, the mortality and morbidity associated with AKI remain high. A major reason for is the lack of early markers for AKI, and hence an unacceptable delay in initiating therapy. Fortunately, the application of innovative technologies such as functional genomics and proteomics to human and animal models of AKI has uncovered several novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The most promising of these are chronicled in this review. These include the identification of biomarker panels in plasma (NGAL and cystatin C) and urine (NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, cystatin C, α1-microglobulin, Fetuin-A, Gro-α, and meprin). It is likely that the AKI panels will be useful for timing the initial insult, and assessing the duration and severity of AKI. It is also probable that the AKI panels will distinguish between the various etiologies of AKI, and predict clinical outcomes. It will be important in future studies to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these biomarker panels in clinical samples from large cohorts and from multiple clinical situations. Such studies will be markedly facilitated by the development of commercial tools for the reproducible measurement of biomarkers across different laboratories.
Keywords: acute renal failure, proteomics, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, cystatin C, interleukin 18, kidney injury molecule-1, biomarker panel
INTRODUCTION - THE URGENT NEED FOR AKI BIOMARKERS
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a term proposed to reflect the entire spectrum of acute renal failure (ARF), a complex disorder that occurs in a wide variety of settings with clinical manifestations ranging from a minimal elevation in serum creatinine to anuric renal failure (1). AKI represents a significant but under-recognized problem in clinical medicine, with devastating immediate and long-term consequences (2–5). The incidence of AKI varies from 5% of hospitalized patients to 30–50% of patients in intensive care units. There is substantial indication that the incidence of AKI is rising at an alarming rate, and the associated mortality and morbidity have remained high despite improvements in clinical care (6–8). While the worst outcomes in AKI have traditionally been associated with dialysis requirement (9, 10), there is now mounting evidence to suggest that even very small increases in serum creatinine portend a significant amplification in mortality and morbidity rates (11–14). While recent advances have suggested novel mechanistic insights and therapeutic approaches in animal models, translational efforts in humans have yielded disappointing results. The reasons for this include a lack of a consensus definition of AKI (1), an incomplete understanding of the underlying pathophysiology (15), and the lack of early biomarkers for AKI, akin to troponins in acute myocardial disease, leading to an unacceptable delay in initiating therapy (16–18). In current clinical practice, AKI is typically diagnosed by measuring serum creatinine. Unfortunately, creatinine is an unreliable indicator during acute changes in kidney function (19). First, serum creatinine levels can vary widely with age, gender, muscle mass, muscle metabolism, medications, and hydration status. Second, serum creatinine concentrations may not change until about 50% of kidney function has already been lost. Third, at lower rates of glomerular filtration, the amount of tubular secretion of creatinine results in overestimation of renal function. Fourth, during acute changes in glomerular filtration, serum creatinine does not accurately depict kidney function until steady state equilibrium has been reached, which may require several days. However, animal studies have shown that while AKI can be prevented and/or treated by several maneuvers, these must be instituted very early after the initiating insult, well before the serum creatinine even begins to rise (15–18). Not surprisingly, the lack of early biomarkers has negatively impacted on a number of landmark clinical trials investigating highly promising therapies for AKI in humans (20, 21).
The quest to improve our knowledge of AKI pathogenesis and early diagnosis is an area of intense contemporary research (22–28). Conventional urinary biomarkers such as casts and fractional excretion of sodium have been insensitive and non-specific for the early recognition of AKI. Other traditional urinary biomarkers such as filtered high molecular weight proteins and tubular proteins or enzymes have also suffered from lack of specificity and dearth of standardized assays. Identification of novel AKI biomarkers has been designated as a top priority by the American Society of Nephrology (29). The concept of developing a new toolbox for earlier diagnosis of disease states is also prominently featured in the NIH Road Map for biomedical research (30). Fortunately, the application of innovative technologies such as functional genomics and proteomics to human and animal models of kidney disease has uncovered several novel candidates that are emerging as biomarkers and therapeutic targets (31–35). This review will update the reader on current advances in proteomics that hold promise primarily in ischemic AKI, the most common and serious subtype of acute renal failure in hospitalized patients. The reader is referred to other publications that address the role of proteomics following nephrotoxins (36, 37), kidney transplantation (38, 39), and glomerulonephritides (40).
DESIRABLE PROPERTIES OF AKI BIOMARKERS
In addition to aiding in the early diagnosis and prediction, biomarkers may serve several other purposes in AKI. Thus, biomarkers are also needed for (a) identifying the primary location of injury (proximal tubule, distal tubule, interstitium, or vasculature); (b) pinpointing the duration of kidney failure (AKI, chronic kidney disease, or “acute-on-chronic”); (c) discerning AKI subtypes (pre-renal, intrinsic renal, or post-renal); (d) identifying AKI etiologies (ischemia, toxins, sepsis, or a combination); (e) differentiating AKI from other forms of acute kidney disease (urinary tract infection, glomerulonephritis, interstitial nephritis); (f) risk stratification and prognostication (duration and severity of AKI, need for renal replacement therapy, length of hospital stay, mortality) (g) defining the course of AKI; and (h) monitoring the response to AKI interventions. Furthermore, AKI biomarkers may play a critical role in expediting the drug development process. The Critical Path Initiative issued by the FDA in 2004 stated that “Additional biomarkers (quantitative measures of biologic effects that provide informative links between mechanism of action and clinical effectiveness) and additional surrogate markers (quantitative measures that can predict effectiveness) are needed to guide product development”.
Desirable characteristics of clinically applicable AKI biomarkers include (a) they should be non-invasive and easy to perform at the bedside or in a standard clinical laboratory, using easily accessible samples such as blood or urine; (b) they should be rapidly and reliably measurable using a standardized assay platform; (c) they should be highly sensitive to facilitate early detection, and with a wide dynamic range and cut-off values that allow for risk stratification; (d) they should be highly specific for AKI, and enable the identification of AKI sub-types and etiologies; and (e) they should exhibit strong biomarker properties on receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
The ROC analysis has been extensively used as a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical studies pertaining to diagnostic testing (41, 42). A ROC curve is a graphical plot of the sensitivity on the y-axis versus (1-specificity) on the x-axis for a binary classifier system as its discrimination threshold is varied. For biomarker analysis, the binary classification task is typically to determine whether a subject has a certain disease (such as AKI) or not. Characteristically, ROC curves are generated for various cut-off points for the biomarker concentration under consideration. A commonly derived statistic from the ROC curve is the area under the curve (AUC). An AUC of 1.0 represents a perfect biomarker, whereas an AUC of 0.5 indicates a result that is no better than expected by random chance. An AUC of 0.75 or above is generally considered a good biomarker, and an AUC of 0.9 or above would represent an excellent biomarker.
THE SEARCH FOR NOVEL AKI BIOMARKERS
The biomarker development process has typically been divided into five phases (43), as shown in Table 1. The preclinical discovery phase requires high-quality, well-characterized tissue or body fluid samples from carefully chosen animal or human models of the disease under investigation. Typically, tissue analysis utilizes genomic approaches whereas body fluids are best analyzed by proteomic techniques. Identifying biomarkers in the serum or urine is most desirable, since these samples are easily obtained and allow for non-invasive testing. Urine is more likely to contain biomarkers arising from the kidney, more applicable for easy patient self-testing, and more amenable to proteomic screening due to the limited number of protein species present. However, urine samples are more prone to protein degradation, and biomarker concentrations may be confounded by changes in urine flow rate. Serum samples are readily available even in anuric patients, and serum biomarkers exhibit better stability. On the other hand, serum markers may reflect the systemic response to a disease process rather than specific organ involvement, and the presence of a large number of normally abundant proteins (such as albumin and immunoglobulins) in blood renders proteomic approaches difficult.
Table 1.
Phases of biomarker development (adapted from reference 43).
Phase | Terminology | Action Steps |
---|---|---|
Phase 1 | Preclinical Discovery |
|
Phase 2 | Assay Development |
|
Phase 3 | Retrospective Study |
|
Phase 4 | Prospective Screening |
|
Phase 5 | Disease Control |
|
The widespread availability of enabling technologies such as functional genomics and proteomics has accelerated the rate of novel biomarker discovery. The advent of the microarray, or cDNA chip, allows investigators to search through thousands of genes simultaneously, making the process very efficient. Such gene expression profiling studies have identified several genes whose protein products have emerged as AKI biomarkers (15, 22), as detailed below. However, microarray-based methods cannot be used for the direct analysis of biological fluids, and usually require downstream confirmation by proteomic techniques prior to clinical use. Proteomics is the study of both the structure and function of proteins by a variety of methods, such as gel electrophoresis, immunoblotting, mass spectrometry, and enzymatic or metabolic assays. Each method is used to determine different types of information and has its own set of strengths and limitations. Advancing technologies have radically improved the speed and precision of identifying and measuring proteins in biological fluids, and proteomic approaches are also beginning to yield novel AKI biomarkers (24–28, 44), as detailed below.
PROTEOMIC ANALYSIS IN AKI – CLUES FROM TRANSCRIPTOME PROFILING
Attempts at unraveling the myriad pathways activated in AKI have been facilitated by transcriptome profiling technologies. Several investigators have used molecular techniques such as cDNA microarrays (45–48) and subtractive hybridizations (49–51) combined with downstream proteomic analysis to identify novel pathways, biomarkers, and drug targets in AKI. Findings from these approaches are voluminous, and only those that are potentially pertinent to human AKI at the present time are detailed below.
Supavekin et al performed detailed mouse kidney microarray analyses at early time points after ischemia-reperfusion injury to identify consistent patterns of altered gene expression, including transcription factors, growth and regenerative genes, and apoptotic molecules (45). Prominent among the last category included FADD, DAXX, BAD, BAK, and p53, all of which were confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Mounting evidence now indicates that apoptosis is a major mechanism of early tubule cell death in contemporary clinical AKI (52-55). Several human models of AKI have consistently demonstrated the presence of apoptotic changes in tubule cells (56-61). Importantly, proteomic studies have now identified a multitude of apoptotic pathways, including the intrinsic (Bcl-2 family, cytochrome c, caspase 9), extrinsic (Fas, FADD, caspase 8), and regulatory (p53) factors, that are activated in tubule cells following human AKI (59-61). As a consequence of these studies, inhibition of apoptosis has emerged as a promising approach in human AKI (62-71). Cell-permeant caspase inhibitors have provided particularly attractive targets for study. In this regard, an orally active small molecule pan-caspase inhibitor (IDN-6556, Pfizer) has been shown to be effective in preventing injury after lung and liver transplantation in animals (70, 71).
Supavekin et al also identified neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (Ngal, also known as lcn2) as one of the most upregulated transcripts in the early post-ischemic mouse kidney (45), a finding that has now been confirmed in several other transcriptome profiling studies. Downstream proteomic studies have also revealed NGAL to be one of the earliest and most robustly induced proteins in the kidney after ischemic or nephrotoxic AKI in animal models, and NGAL protein is easily detected in the blood and urine soon after AKI (72-75). These findings have spawned a number of translational proteomic studies to evaluate NGAL as a novel biomarker in human AKI.
In a cross-sectional study, subjects in the intensive care unit with established ARF displayed a greater than 10-fold increase in plasma NGAL and more than a 100-fold increase in urine NGAL by Western blotting when compared to normal controls (74). Both plasma and urine NGAL correlated highly with serum creatinine levels. Kidney biopsies in these patients showed intense accumulation of immuno-reactive NGAL in 50% of the cortical tubules. These results identified NGAL as a widespread and sensitive response to established AKI in humans. In a prospective study of children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, AKI (defined as a 50% increase in serum creatinine) occurred in 28% of the subjects, but the diagnosis using serum creatinine was only possible 1–3 days after surgery (76). In marked contrast, NGAL measurements by Western blotting and by ELISA revealed a robust 10-fold or more increase in the urine and plasma, within 2–6 hours of the surgery in patients who subsequently developed AKI. Both urine and plasma NGAL were powerful independent predictors of AKI, with an AUC of 0.998 for the 2 hour urine NGAL and 0.91 for the 2 hour plasma NGAL measurement (76). The 2 hour NGAL level represented a strong independent predictor of clinical outcomes such as duration of AKI among cases (77). Thus, plasma and urine NGAL have emerged as sensitive, specific, and highly predictive early biomarkers of AKI after cardiac surgery in children. These findings have now been confirmed in a prospective study of adults who developed AKI after cardiac surgery, in whom urinary NGAL was significantly elevated by 1–3 hours after the operation (78). AKI, defined as a 50% increase in serum creatinine, did not occur until the third post-operative day. However, patients who did not encounter AKI also displayed a significant increase in urine NGAL in the early post-operative period, although to a much lesser degree than in those who subsequently developed AKI. The AUC reported in this study was 0.74 for the 3 hour NGAL and 0.80 for the 18 hour NGAL, which is perhaps reflective of the confounding variables typically encountered in adults.
NGAL has also been evaluated as a biomarker of AKI in kidney transplantation. Biopsies of kidneys obtained 1 hour after vascular anastomosis revealed a significant correlation between NGAL staining intensity and the subsequent development of delayed graft function (79). In a prospective multicenter study of children and adults, urine NGAL levels in samples collected on the day of transplant clearly identified cadaveric kidney recipients who subsequently developed delayed graft function and dialysis requirement (which typically occurred 2–4 days later). The ROC curve for prediction of delayed graft function based on urine NGAL at day 0 showed an AUC of 0.9, indicative of an excellent predictive biomarker (80). Urine NGAL has also been shown to predict the severity of AKI and dialysis requirement in a multicenter study of children with diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (81). Preliminary results also suggest that plasma and urine NGAL measurements represent predictive biomarkers of AKI following contrast administration (82–84) and in the intensive care setting (85).
In summary, NGAL is emerging as a center-stage player in the AKI field, as a novel predictive biomarker. However, it is acknowledged that the studies published thus far are small, in which NGAL appears to be most sensitive and specific in relatively uncomplicated patient populations with AKI. NGAL measurements may be influenced by a number of coexisting variables such as pre-existing renal disease (86) and systemic or urinary tract infections (87). Large multicenter studies to further define the predictive role of plasma and urine NGAL as a member of the putative “AKI panel” have been initiated, robust assays for commercialization are nearly complete, and the results are awaited with optimism.
Ichimura et al performed a subtractive hybridization screening to identify kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1) as a gene that is markedly up-regulated in ischemic rat kidneys (49), a finding that has been consistently duplicated in several other transcriptome profiling studies. Downstream proteomic studies have also shown KIM-1 to be one of the most highly induced proteins in the kidney after AKI in animal models, and a proteolytically processed domain of KIM-1 is easily detected in the urine soon after AKI (88-90). In a small human cross-sectional study, KIM-1 was found to be markedly induced in proximal tubules in kidney biopsies from patients with established AKI (primarily ischemic), and urinary KIM-1 measured by ELISA distinguished ischemic AKI from prerenal azotemia and chronic renal disease (88). Patients with AKI induced by contrast did not have increased urinary KIM-1.
Recent preliminary studies have expanded the potential clinical utility of KIM-1 as a predictive AKI biomarker. In a cohort of 103 adults undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, AKI (defined as a 0.3 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine) developed in 31%, in whom the urinary KIM-1 levels increased by about 40% at 2 hours post surgery and by more than 100% at the 24 hour time point (91). In a small case-control study of 40 children undergoing cardiac surgery, 20 with AKI (defined as a 50% increase in serum creatinine) and 20 without AKI, urinary KIM-1 levels were markedly enhanced, with an AUC of 0.83 at the 12 hour time point (92). In a larger prospective cohort study of 201 hospitalized patients with established AKI, both urinary KIM-1 as well as urinary N-Acetyl-β-(D)-Glucosaminidase (NAG) were found to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including dialysis requirement and death (91).
Thus, KIM-1 represents a promising candidate for inclusion in the urinary “AKI panel”. An advantage of KIM-1 over NGAL is that it appears to be more specific to ischemic or nephrotoxic AKI, and not significantly affected by prerenal azotemia, urinary tract infections, or chronic kidney disease. It is likely that NGAL and KIM-1 will emerge as tandem biomarkers of AKI, with NGAL being most sensitive at the earliest time points and KIM-1 adding significant specificity at slightly later time points.
Gene expression studies have provided several additional clues regarding the AKI proteome, but human data are hitherto lacking. For example, Muramatsu et al have utilized a subtractive hybridization approach to identify Cyr61 (also known as CCN1) as a markedly upregulated gene in the rat kidney very early after ischemic injury (50). CYR61 protein was induced in the kidney within one hour and detectable in the urine at 3–6 hours after ischemic injury, but not after volume depletion (50). However, this detection required a complex bioaffinity purification step with heparin-Sepharose beads, and even after such purification, several cross-reacting peptides were apparent. A more convenient platform for the evaluation of CYR61 as a urinary biomarker in humans has not been available to date. Zahedi et al described spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT), the rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine catabolism, as a novel early biomarker of tubular cell damage after ischemic injury in rats (51). SSAT protein appears to play a role in the initiation of oxidant-mediated injury to tubules, raising the possibility of inhibition of polyamine catabolism as a future therapeutic approach (94). Tarabishi et al showed that another maximally induced gene identified very early after ischemic injury in animal models is Zf9, a Kruppel-like transcription factor involved in the regulation of a number of downstream targets (95). Zf9 protein is markedly upregulated in the postischemic tubule cells, along with its major trans-activating factor, TGF-β1. Gene silencing of Zf9 abrogated TGF-β1 protein expression and mitigated the apoptotic response to ischemic injury in vitro (95). These studies have thus identified a novel pathway that may play a critical role in the early tubule cell death that accompanies ischemic renal injury. Thakar et al have employed transcriptome profiling in rat models to identify thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1), a previously known p53-dependent pro-apoptotic and anti-angiogenic molecule, as another maximally induced gene early after ischemic AKI (47). The TSP-1 protein product is upregulated in the postischemic proximal tubule cells, where it colocalizes with activated caspase-3. TSP-1 null mice were partially protected from ischemic injury, with striking structural preservation of kidney tissue (47). These results have thus identified yet another previously unknown apoptotic protein that is activated in proximal tubule cells early after ischemic AKI in animals.
Transcripts that have been consistently reported to be either upregulated or downregulated in animal models of AKI are listed in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. While many of them have now been confirmed by downstream proteomic analysis, the majority of these studies remain in the pre-clinical research realm, and convincing data attesting to their utility in human AKI are currently unavailable.
Table 2.
Genes reported to be upregulated in at least 3 separate transcriptome profiling studies. The column on the right shows references of published proteomic studies that have confirmed the induction of the corresponding gene product.
Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Protein Ref |
---|---|---|
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A | p21/Cip1/WAF | 96 |
Clusterin | CLU | 97 |
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein (gravin) 12 | AKAP12/SSeCK | None |
Tubulin, beta | TUBB | 98 |
Heme oxygenase (decycling) 1 | HMOX1 | 99 |
Activating transcription factor 3 | ATF3 | 48 |
Metallothionein 1A | MT1A | 100 |
Lectin, galactoside-binding, soluble, 3 (Galectin 3) | LGALS3 | 101 |
Early growth response 1 | EGR1 | 102 |
Claudin 7 | CLDN7 | None |
CD68 antigen | CD68 | 103 |
Lipocalin 2 (Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin) | LCN2/NGAL | 72 |
Kidney injury molecule 1 | KIM-1/HAVCR1 | 49 |
c-Fos | cFos | 104 |
Annexin A2/Calpactin 1 | ANXA2 | 46 |
Heath shock protein 70 kDa | HSP70 | 105 |
Interleukin 6 | IL6 | 103 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 | CXCL1/Gro-1 | 104 |
Table 3.
Genes reported to be downregulated in at least 3 separate transcriptome profiling studies. The column on the right shows references of published proteomic studies that have confirmed the suppression of the corresponding gene product.
Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Protein Ref |
---|---|---|
Epidermal growth factor | EGF | 107 |
Afamin/alpha-albumin | AFM | None |
Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor | LIFR | 106 |
Solute carrier family 9, member 3 | SLC9A3/NHE3 | 109 |
Solute carrier family 16, member 7 | SLC16A7 | None |
Uromodulin (Tamm-Horsfall mucoprotein) | UMOD | 110 |
DIRECT PROTEOMIC PROFILING IN ISCHEMIC AKI
Recent advances in the field of direct proteomic profiling have accelerated the discovery of novel protein biomarkers and therapeutic targets for AKI (31-40, 111-113). Of the various methods and platforms available, the Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) technology has emerged as one of the preferred platforms for rapid urinary protein profiling (114-116). This approach allows for rapid high throughput profiling of multiple urine samples, detects low molecular weight biomarkers that are typically missed by other platforms, and even uncovers proteins bound to albumin. The commercial availability of the ProteinChip® Biomarker System and the accompanying bioinformatic software (Bio-Rad) has provided investigators with the convenient tools to obtain reproducible results and their statistical interpretation. Previously quoted problems with calibration difficulties and variability of reagents have now been largely resolved by the commercial availability of All-in-1 peptide/protein calibration standards (Bio-Rad) and standardized chromatographic solutions (BioSeptra®). However, persistent disadvantages of this method include the limited ability to resolve large molecular weight proteins, and the difficulties with identifying the protein peaks.
Nguyen et al (117) have employed SELDI-TOF-MS technology to identify urinary biomarker patterns that predict AKI in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Urine aliquots at baseline (t=0) and 2 hours (t=2h) were assigned to control (n=15) or ARF groups (n=15). ARF was defined as a 50% or greater increase in serum creatinine. Representative samples of spectra obtained are shown in Figure 1. The SELDI-TOF-MS analysis of the ARF group at t=0 vs t=2h consistently showed a marked enhancement of protein biomarkers with m/z of 6.4 (not shown), 28, 43, and 66 kDa. The same biomarkers were significantly different when comparing control vs ARF groups at t=2h. No differences were detected in control vs ARF patients at t=0. It should be noted that the serum creatinine in these patients did not increase until day 2–3 after surgery. Scatter plots revealed a dramatic increase in peak intensity of all four novel biomarkers in the ARF group at baseline (t=0) versus 2 h post CPB, with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the 0.90 to 0.98 range, indicative of excellent biomarkers (117). Thus, this proteomic approach has revealed a distinctive AKI fingerprint comprising of at least four biomarkers that are markedly enhanced within 2 hours of CPB in patients who subsequently developed AKI, and has shown that the SELDI-TOF-MS method is sensitive, non-invasive (requiring only microliter quantities of urine), rapid (with no special preparation steps needed), and reproducible. An important limitation to this study is that it represents a single center analysis involving only children and young adults with congenital heart disease. A second limitation is the exclusion of patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and nephrotoxin use. These results therefore need to be validated in a larger population of susceptible patients. It will also be important in future studies to confirm the identity of the four biomarkers uncovered by this study, and to determine their individual and collective robustness for the prediction of AKI.
Figure 1.
Overlay of representative SELDI-TOF-MS spectra of urine obtained at baseline and 2 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass from patients who subsequently developed ARF. Marked enhancement of 28, 33, 43, and 66 kDa species is noted in the ARF group at 2 hours post-surgery, as highlighted by the arrows. Patients in the control group did not display similar peaks at any time point post-surgery.
In another direct proteomic profiling study in humans, Lefler et al utilized two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) followed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization and Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS or MALDI-TOF/TOF) to characterize proteins removed by continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure (118). The 2DE method allows for good separation and quantitation of individual proteins, and the resolved protein spots are directly amenable to identification by peptide mass fingerprinting (MALDI-TOF-MS) and/or peptide sequencing (MALDI-TOF/TOF). However, gel-based proteomics also have limitations. They are time- and labor-intensive, and there is considerable difficulty in detecting low-abundance proteins and insoluble membrane proteins. Nevertheless, Lefler et al identified several proteins in the effluent by peptide mass fingerprinting, including albumin, apolipoprotein A-IV, β-2-microglobulin, lithostathine, mannose-binding lectin associated serine protease 2 associated protein, plasma retinol-binding protein, transferrin, transthyretin, vitamin D-binding protein, and Zn α-2 glycoprotein (118). Direct sequencing of tryptic peptides confirmed the identity of all except apolipoprotein A-IV, transferrin, transthyretin, and serine protease 2 associated protein. The potential therapeutic or detrimental implications of the identified proteins being removed by renal replacement therapy are unclear at the present time. The identified proteins are known to be present in serum. Given their multiple physiological roles, it is conceivable that loss of albumin, transferrin, and vitamin D-binding protein may contribute to the complex pathophysiology of acute renal failure in dialyzed patients.
Zhou et al have employed two-dimensional differential in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) followed by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF) or liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS) to examine urinary exosomes in animal models of AKI (119). Urinary exosomes containing apical membranes and intracellular fluid are normally secreted into the urine from all nephron segments, and contain protein markers of structural and functional renal damage. Exosomes represent a unique source for the discovery of non-invasive urinary biomarkers that can overcome much of the interference from abundant urinary proteins such as albumin, globulin, and Tamm-Horsfall mucoprotein (120, 121). Zhou et al initially uncovered 74 peptide spots that showed differential expression by 2D-DIGE of urinary exosomes following nephrotoxic injury with cisplatin. Fifteen of these proteins were identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF, and an additional 13 detected by LC-MS/MS. Out of these, Western blotting was able to confirm only two protein expression changes, namely Fetuin-A (increased in AKI) and annexin V (decreased in AKI). The very low rate with which differentially expressed proteins were identified and confirmed in this study exemplifies many of the limitations associated with the 2D-DIGE methodology. Nevertheless, the authors subsequently identified Fetuin-A within urinary exosomes by immunoelectron microscopy, and validated urinary exosomal Fetuin-A to be increased more than 30-fold in the early phase of ischemia-reperfusion injury by Western blotting. Urinary exosomal Fetuin-A was also noted to be markedly increased by Western blotting in three patients in the intensive care unit with AKI compared to patients without AKI. This proteomic approach has therefore identified Fetuin-A as a potential biomarker for human AKI. Factors that currently limit the widespread clinical testing of Fetuin-A include the complex steps required for exosome preparation, and the lack of an easily translatable assay such as an ELISA.
Molls et al have utilized commercial protein arrays (cytokine multiplex bead-based assays) to measure 18 cytokines and chemokines in mouse kidney homogenates early after ischemia-reperfusion injury (122). The earliest and most consistent change noted was a rise in kidney keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC), with a 13-fold increase within 3 hours of ischemic injury. By ELISA, serum and urinary KC levels at 3 hours post-ischemia were also significantly enhanced in mice that developed an increase in serum creatinine 24 hours after the injury. Importantly, in a small cohort of patients, the human analog of KC, namely Gro-α, was markedly upregulated in the urine of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function, in comparison with recipients with good graft function (122). Thus, these studies using protein arrays have identified Gro-α as another potential candidate for inclusion in the urinary “AKI panel”. This approach is obviously hampered by the limited number of candidates that can be detected using a given protein array.
Holly et al have used 2D-DIGE followed by MALDI-TOF to identify differentially expressed urinary proteins in a rat model of sepsis-induced AKI (123). Sepsis is one of the most common causes of human ARF, and the resultant renal dysfunction is primarily due to ischemic injury, resulting from a potent combination of renal vasoconstriction and systemic vasodilatation (124). While initial 2D-DIGE of urine samples identified 97 differentially expressed spots in rats with sepsis-induced AKI, subsequent peptide mass fingerprinting could identify only 30 of those. The few peptides that were upregulated included previously known candidates such as albumin, aminopeptidase, and alpha-2 microglobulin (also known as lipocalin or NGAL). The majority of the differentially expressed urinary proteins were decreased in sepsis-induced AKI, including uromodulin (Tamm-Horsfall mucoprotein), serum protease inhibitors, and the brush border enzyme meprin-1-alpha. The authors chose to further characterize meprin-1-alpha. By Western blotting, septic rats with ARF displayed a decrease in meprin. Furthermore, inhibition of meprin with actinonin partially ameliorated sepsis-induced ARF. Thus, despite the limitations described, this proteomic approach has identified meprin not only as a potential urinary biomarker that is repressed in a rat model of sepsis-induced AKI, but also as a therapeutic target. Studies of meprin in human AKI have not been reported to date.
More focused proteomic approaches have recently yielded additional biomarkers for AKI. For example, IL-18 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is known to be induced and cleaved in the proximal tubule, and subsequently easily detected in the urine following ischemic AKI in animal models (125). In a cross-sectional study, urine IL-18 levels measured by ELISA were markedly increased in patients with established AKI, but not in subjects with urinary tract infection, chronic kidney disease, nephritic syndrome, or prerenal failure (126). Urinary IL-18 was significantly upregulated up to 48 hours prior to the increase in serum creatinine in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who develop AKI, with an AUC of 0.73, and represented an independent predictor of mortality in this cohort (127). Both urinary IL-18 and NGAL were recently shown to represent early, predictive, sequential AKI biomarkers in children undergoing cardiac surgery (77). In patients who developed AKI 2-3 days after surgery, urinary NGAL was induced within 2 hours and peaked at 6 hours whereas urine IL-18 levels increased around 6 hours and peaked at over 25-fold at 12 hours post surgery (AUC 0.75). Both IL-18 and NGAL were independently associated with duration of AKI among cases. Urine NGAL and IL-18 have also emerged as predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function following kidney transplantation (80). In a prospective multicenter study of children and adults, both NGAL and IL-18 in urine samples collected on the day of transplant predicted delayed graft function and dialysis requirement with AUC of 0.9. Thus, IL-18 may also represent a promising candidate for inclusion in the urinary “AKI panel”. IL-18 is more specific to ischemic AKI, and not affected by nephrotoxins, chronic kidney disease or urinary tract infections. It is likely that NGAL, IL-18 and KIM-1 will emerge as sequential urinary biomarkers of AKI.
Herget-Rosenthal et al have measured urinary excretion of a number of candidate biomarker proteins (α1-microglobulin, β2-microglobulin, cystatin C, retinol-binding protein, α-glutathione S-transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) early in the course of nonoliguric acute renal failure in humans (128). In this cohort of patients with established ARF (defined as a doubling of serum creatinine) from a variety of causes, urinary excretion of α1-microglobulin and cystatin C were found to be predictive of severe ARF requiring renal replacement therapy, with an AUC of 0.86 and 0.92 respectively. Alpha1-microglobulin is a tubular protein that belongs to the lipocalin superfamily, similar to NGAL. Cystatin C is a cysteine protease inhibitor that is synthesized and released into the blood at a relatively constant rate by all nucleated cells. It is freely filtered by the glomerulus, normally reabsorbed by the proximal tubule, and not secreted. Both α1-microglobulin and cystatin C are stable in the urine, and can be easily measured by immunonephelometric methods in most standard clinical chemistry laboratories. The predictive role of these urinary proteins in early AKI remains to be determined.
Since blood levels of cystatin C are not significantly affected by age, gender, race, or muscle mass, it has been proposed as a better predictor of glomerular function than serum creatinine in patients with AKI. In the intensive care setting, a 50% increase in serum cystatin C predicted AKI one to two days before the rise in serum creatinine, with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.82 respectively (18). A recent prospective study compared the ability of serum cystatin C and NGAL in the prediction of AKI following cardiac surgery (129). Out of 129 patients, 41 developed AKI (defined as a 50% increase in serum creatinine) 1–3 days after cardiopulmonary bypass. In AKI cases, serum NGAL levels were elevated at 2 hours post-surgery, whereas serum cystatin C levels increased only after 12 hours. Both NGAL and cystatin C levels at 12 hours were strong independent predictors of AKI, but NGAL outperformed cystatin C at earlier time points. Thus, both NGAL and cystatin C may represent promising tandem biomarker candidates for inclusion in the blood “AKI panel”.
CONCLUSIONS
The tools of contemporary proteomics have provided us with promising novel biomarkers for the clinical investigation of AKI in humans. The most promising of these are outlined in Table 4, and their current status is chronicled in this review. These include a plasma panel (NGAL and cystatin C) and a urine panel (NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, cystatin C, α1-microglobulin, Fetuin-A, Gro-α, and meprin). Since they represent tandem biomarkers, it is likely that the AKI panels will be useful for timing the initial insult and assessing the duration and severity of AKI (analogous to the cardiac panel for evaluating chest pain). Based on the differential expression of the biomarkers, it is also likely that the AKI panels will help distinguish between the various types and etiologies of AKI, and predict clinical outcomes. However, they have hitherto been tested only in small studies and in a limited number of clinical situations. It will be important in future studies to validate the sensitivity and specificity of these biomarker panels in clinical samples from large cohorts and from multiple clinical situations. Such studies will be markedly facilitated by the availability of commercial tools for the reliable and reproducible measurement of biomarkers across different laboratories. Ongoing and future proteomic studies will likely yield additional sensitive and specific biomarkers for the investigation of AKI resulting from diverse etiologies. Such tools will be indispensable for the early diagnosis and initiation of timely therapeutic measures.
TABLE 4.
Current status of promising AKI biomarkers in various clinical situations
Biomarker Name | Sample Source | Cardiac Surgery | Contrast Nephropathy | Sepsis or ICU | Kidney Transplant | Commercial Test? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGAL | Plasma | Early | Early | Early | Early | Biosite, Inc.* |
Cystatin C | Plasma | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | Dade-Behring |
NGAL | Urine | Early | Early | Early | Early | Abbott* |
IL-18 | Urine | Intermediate | Absent | Intermediate | Intermediate | None |
KIM-1 | Urine | Intermediate | Not Tested | Intermediate | Not Tested | None |
In Development
Acknowledgments
Studies cited in this review that were performed in the author’s laboratory were supported by grants from the NIH/NIDDK (R01 DK53289 and R21 DK070163), a Grant-in-Aid from the American Heart Association Ohio Valley Affiliate, and a Translational Research Initiative Grant from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11:R31. doi: 10.1186/cc5713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Acute renal failure. Lancet. 2005;365:417–430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17831-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005;294:813–818. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.7.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Palevsky PM. Epidemiology of acute renal failure: the tip of the iceberg. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:6–7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01521005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liangos O, Wald R, O’Bell JW, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute renal failure in hospitalized patients: a national survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:43–51. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00220605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xue JL, Daniels F, Star RA, et al. Incidence and mortality of acute renal failure in medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2001. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:1135–1142. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005060668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ympa YP, Sakr Y, Reinhart K, et al. Has mortality from acute renal failure decreased? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2005;118:827–832. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Waikar SS, Curhan GC, Wald R, et al. Declining mortality in patients with acute renal failure, 1988 to 2002. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:1143–1150. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005091017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Metnitz PG, krenn CG, Steltzer H, et al. Effect of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2051–2058. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clermont G, Acker CG, Angus DC, et al. Renal failure in the ICU: comparison of the impact of acute renal failure and end-stage renal disease on ICU outcomes. Kidney Int. 2002;62:986–996. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00509.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lassning A, Schmidlin D, Mouhieddine M, et al. Minimal changes of serum creatinine predict prognosis in patients after cardiothoracic surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1597–1605. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000130340.93930.dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent JL, et al. Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2194–2201. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000182798.39709.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, et al. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3365–3370. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004090740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hoste EAJ, Clermont G, Kersten A, et al. RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury is associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10:R73–82. doi: 10.1186/cc4915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Devarajan P. Update on mechanisms of ischemic acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:1503–1520. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006010017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schrier RW. Need to intervene in established acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:2756–2758. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000141324.49873.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hewitt SM, Dear J, Star RA. Discovery of protein biomarkers for renal diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1677–1689. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000129114.92265.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herget-Rosenthal S, Marggraf G, Hüsing J, et al. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1115–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C. Defining acute renal failure: physiological principles. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:33–37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2078-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Allgren RL, Marbury TC, Rahman SN, et al. Anaritide in acute tubule necrosis. Auriculin Anaritide Acute Renal Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:828–834. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703203361203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hirschberg R, Kopple J, Lipsett P, et al. Multicenter clinical trial of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor 1 in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;55:2423–2432. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Devarajan P, Mishra J, Supavekin S, et al. Gene expression in early ischemic renal injury: clues towards pathogenesis, biomarker discovery, and novel therapeutics. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;80:365–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2003.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Han WK, Bonventre JV. Biologic markers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Curr Op Crit Care. 2004;10:476–482. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000145095.90327.f2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou H, Hewitt SM, Yuen PST, et al. Acute kidney injury biomarkers – needs, present status, and future promise. NephSAP. 2006;5:63–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Perco P, Pleban C, Kainz A, et al. Protein biomarkers associated with acute renal failure and chronic kidney disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2006;36:753–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Devarajan P. Emerging biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Contrib Nephrol. 2007;156:203–212. doi: 10.1159/000102085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bonventre JV. Diagnosis of acute kidney injury: from classic parameters to new biomarkers. Contrib Nephrol. 2007;156:213–219. doi: 10.1159/000102086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nguyen MT, Devarajan P. Biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007 Mar 30; doi: 10.1007/s00467-007-0470-x. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.American Society of Nephrology. Renal Research Report. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1886–1893. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005030285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zerhouni E. The NIH Roadmap. Science. 2003;302:63–65. doi: 10.1126/science.1091867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thongboonkerd V. Proteomics in nephrology: Current status and future directions. Am J Nephrol. 2004;24:360–378. doi: 10.1159/000079148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thongboonkerd V. Proteomic analysis of renal diseases: unraveling the pathophysiology and biomarker discovery. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2005;2:349–366. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2.3.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vidal BC, Bonventre JV, Hsu SIH. Towards the application of proteomics in renal disease diagnosis. Clin Sci. 2005;109:421–430. doi: 10.1042/CS20050085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pisitkun T, Johnstone R, Knepper MA. Discovery of urinary biomarkers. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:1760–1771. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R600004-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.O’Riordan E, Gross SS, Goligorsky MS. Technology insight: renal proteomics – at the crossroads between promise and problems. Nat Clin Prac Nephrol. 2006;2:445–458. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Witzmann FA, Li J. Proteomics and nephrotoxicity. Contrib Nephrol. 2004;141:104–123. doi: 10.1159/000074593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gibbs A. Comparison of the specificity and sensitivity of traditional methods for assessment of nephrotoxicity in the rat with metabolomic and proteomic methodologies. J Appl Toxicol. 2005;25:277–295. doi: 10.1002/jat.1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schaub S, Wilkins JA, Rush D, Nickerson P. Developing a tool for noninvasive monitoring of renal allografts. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2006;3:497–509. doi: 10.1586/14789450.3.5.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wishart DS. Metabolomics in monitoring kidney transplants. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2006;15:637–642. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000247499.64291.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thongboonkerd V, Klein JB, Jevans AW, McLeish KR. Urinary proteomics and biomarker discovery for glomerular diseases. Contrib Nephrol. 2004;141:292–307. doi: 10.1159/000074606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39:561–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pepe MS, editor. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press; Cary, NC: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, et al. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1054–1061. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nguyen M, Ross G, Dent C, et al. Early prediction of acute renal injury using urinary proteomics. Am J Nephrol. 2005;25:318–326. doi: 10.1159/000086476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Supavekin S, Zhang W, Kucherlapati R, et al. Differential gene expression following early renal ischemia-reperfusion. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1714–1724. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00928.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cheng C-W, Rifai A, Ka S-M, et al. Calcium-binding proteins annexin A2 and S100A6 are sensors of tubular injury and recovery in acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2005;68:2694–2703. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Thakar CV, Zahedi K, Revelo MP, et al. Identification of thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1) as a novel mediator of cell injury in kidney ischemia. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3451–3459. doi: 10.1172/JCI25461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yuen PST, Jo S-K, Holly MK, et al. Ischemic and nephrotoxic acute renal failure are distinguished by their broad transcriptomic responses. Physiol Genomics. 2006;25:375–386. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00223.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ichimura T, Bonventre JC, Bailly V, et al. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1), a putative epithelial cell adhesion molecule containing a novel immunoglobulin domain, is up-regulated in renal cells after injury. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:4135–4142. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.7.4135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Muramatsu Y, Tsujie M, Kohda Y, et al. Early detection of cysteine rich protein 61 (CYR61, CCN1) in urine following renal ischemic reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2002;62:1601–1610. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zahedi K, Wang Z, Barone S, et al. Expression of SSAT, a novel biomarker of tubular cell damage, increases in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;284:F1046–F1055. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00318.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Saikumar P, Venkatachalam MA. Role of apoptosis in hypoxic/ischemic damage in the kidney. Semin Nephrol. 2003;6:512–521. doi: 10.1053/s0270-9295(03)00130-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kaushal GP, Basnakian AG, Shah SV. Apoptotic pathways in ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2004;66:500–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.761_6.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dagher PC. Apoptosis in ischemic renal injury: Roles of GTP depletion and p53. Kidney Int. 2004;66:506–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.761_7.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Del Rio M, Imam A, DeLeon M, et al. The death domain of kidney ankyrin interacts with Fas and promotes Fas-mediated cell death in renal epithelia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:41–51. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000104840.04124.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Burns AT, Davies DR, McLaren AJ, et al. Apoptosis in ischemia/reperfusion injury of human renal allografts. Transplantation. 1998;66:872–876. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199810150-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Oberbauer R, Rohrmoser M, Regele H, et al. Apoptosis of tubular epithelial cells in donor kidney biopsies predicts early renal allograft function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:2006–2013. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1092006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schwarz C, Hauser P, Steininger R, et al. Failure of Bcl-2 up-regulation in proximal tubular epithelial cells of donor kidney biopsy specimens is associated with apoptosis and delayed graft function. Lab Invest. 2002;82:941–948. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000021174.66841.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hoffman SC, Kampen RL, Amur S, et al. Molecular and immunohistochemical characterization of the onset and resolution of human renal allograft ischemia-reperfusion injury. Transplantation. 2002;74:916–923. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200210150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Castaneda MP, Swiatecka-Urban A, Mitsnefes MM, et al. Activation of mitochondrial apoptotic pathways in human renal allografts following ischemia-reperfusion. Transplantation. 2003;76:50–54. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000069835.95442.9F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hauser P, Schwarz C, Mitterbauer C, et al. Genome-wide gene-expression patterns of donor kidney biopsies distinguish primary allograft function. Lab Invest. 2004;84:353–361. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ortiz A, Justo P, Sanz A, et al. Targeting apoptosis in acute tubular injury. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:1589–1594. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00515-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fleischer A, Ghadiri A, Dessauge F, et al. 2006:1065–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Faubel S, Edelstein CL. Caspases as drug targets in ischemic organ injury. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord. 2005;5:269–287. doi: 10.2174/1568008054863754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Green DR, Kroemer G. Pharmacologic manipulation of cell death: clinical applications insight? J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2610–2617. doi: 10.1172/JCI26321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bouchier-Hayes L, Lartigue L, Newmeyer DD. Mitochondria: pharmacological manipulation of cell death. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2640–2647. doi: 10.1172/JCI26274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Letai A. Pharmacologic manipulation of Bcl-2 family members to control cell death. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2648–2655. doi: 10.1172/JCI26250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lavrik IN, Golks A, Krammer PH. Caspases: pharmacological manipulation of cell death. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2665–2672. doi: 10.1172/JCI26252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jani A, Ljubanivic D, Faubel SG, et al. Caspase inhibition prevents the increase in caspase-3, -2, -8 and -9 activity and apoptosis in the cold ischemic mouse kidney. Am J Transplant. 2004;8:1246–1254. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hoglen NC, Chen LS, Fisher CD, et al. Characterization of IDN-6556 (3-[2-(2-tert-butyl-phenylaminooxalyl)-amino]-propionylamino]-4-oxo-5-(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-phenoxy)-pentanoic acid): a liver-targeted caspase inhibitor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;309:634–640. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.062034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Quadri SM, Segall L, de Perrot M, et al. Caspase inhibition improves ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:292–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, et al. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel urinary biomarker for ischemic injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;4:2534–2543. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000088027.54400.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mishra J, Mori K, Ma Q, et al. Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL): a novel urinary biomarker for cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Am J Nephrol. 2004;24:307–315. doi: 10.1159/000078452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mori K, Lee HT, Rapoport D, et al. Endocytic delivery of lipocalin-siderophore-iron complex rescues the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:610–621. doi: 10.1172/JCI23056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schmitt-Ott KM, Mori K, Kalandadze A, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-mediated iron traffic in kidney epithelia. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;15:442–449. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000232886.81142.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mishra J, Dent C, Tarabishi R, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury following cardiac surgery. Lancet. 2005;365:1231–121238. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74811-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Parikh CR, Mishra J, Thiessen-Philbrook H, et al. Urinary IL-18 is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Kidney Int. 2006;70:199–203. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wagener G, Jan M, Kim M, et al. Association between increases in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and acute renal dysfunction after adult cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:485–491. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200609000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Mishra J, Ma Q, Kelly C, et al. Kidney NGAL is a novel early marker of acute injury following transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;21:856–863. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0055-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Parikh CR, Jani A, Mishra J, et al. Urine NGAL and IL-18 are predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function following kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1639–1645. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Trachtman H, Christen E, Cnaan A, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in D+HUS: A novel marker of renal injury. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;21:989–994. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0146-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bachorzewska-Gajewska H, Malyszko J, Sitniewska E, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and renal function after percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Nephrol. 2006;26:287–292. doi: 10.1159/000093961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bachorzewska-Gajewska H, Malyszko J, Sitniewska E, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) correlations with cystatin C, serum creatinine and eGFR in patients with normal serum creatinine undergoing coronary angiography. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:295–296. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Devarajan P, Hirsch R, Dent C, et al. NGAL is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury following contrast administration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:48A. (abstr) [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zappitelli M, Washburn K, Arikan AA, et al. Urine NGAL is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury in critically ill children. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:404A. (abstr) [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mitsnefes M, Kathman T, Mishra J, et al. Serum NGAL as a marker of renal function in children with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22:101–108. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Xu S, Venge P. Lipocalins as biochemical markers of disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;482:298–307. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00163-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, et al. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int. 2006;62:237–244. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ichimura T, Hung CC, Yang SA, et al. Kidney injury molecule-1: a tissue and urinary biomarker for nephrotoxicant-induced renal injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004;286:F552–F563. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00285.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Vaidya VS, Ramirez V, Ichimura T, et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1: a sensitive quantitative biomarker for early detection of kidney tubular injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F517–F529. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00291.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Liangos O, Han WK, Wald R, et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 level is an early and sensitive marker of acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:403A. (abstr) [Google Scholar]
- 92.Han WK, Waikar SS, Johnson A, et al. Urinary biomarkers for early detection of acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:403A. (abstr) [Google Scholar]
- 93.Liangos O, Perianayagam MC, Vaidya VS, et al. Urinary N-Acetyl-□-(D)-Glucosaminidase activity and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 level are associated with adverse outcomes in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:904–912. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wang Z, Zahedi K, Barone S, et al. Overexpression of SSAT in kidney cells recapitulates various phenotypic aspects of kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1844–1852. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000131525.77636.d5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Tarabishi R, Zahedi K, Mishra J, et al. Induction of Zf9 in the kidney following early ischemia/reperfusion. Kidney Int. 2005;68:1511–1519. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hochegger K, Koppelstatter C, Tagwerker A, et al. p21 and mTERT are novel markers for determining different ischemic time periods in renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007 doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00084.2006. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Nath KA, Dvergsten J, Correa-Rotter R, et al. Induction of clusterin and chronic oxidative renal disease in the rat and its dissociation from cell injury. Lab Invest. 1004;71:209–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Caron A, Desrosiers RR, Beliveau R. Kidney ischemia-reperfusion regulates expression and distribution of tubulin subunits, β-actin and rho GTPases in proximal tubules. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;431:31–46. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Akagi R, Takahashi T, Sassa S. Cytoprotective effects of heme oxygenase in acute renal failure. Contrib Nephrol. 2005;148:70–85. doi: 10.1159/000086044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Takahashi T, Itano Y, Noji S, et al. Induction of renal metallothionein in rats with ischemic renal failure. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. 2001;110:147–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Nishiyama J, Kobayashi S, Ishida A, et al. Up-regulation of Galectin-3 in acute renal failure of the rat. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:815–823. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64595-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Bonventre JV, Sukhatme VP, Bamberger M, et al. Localization of the protein product of the immediate early growth response gene, Egr-1, in the kidney after ischemia and reperfusion. Cell Regul. 1991;2:251–260. doi: 10.1091/mbc.2.3.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Briscoe DM, Pober JS, Harmon WE, et al. Expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in human renal allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992;3:1180–1185. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V351180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Witzgall R, Brown D, Schwarz C, et al. Localization ofproliferating cell nuclear antigen, vimentin, c-Fos, and clusterin in the postischemic kidney. Evidence for a heterogeneous genetic response among nephron segments, and a large pool of mitotically active and dedifferentiated cells. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2175–2188. doi: 10.1172/JCI117214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Aufricht C. Heat-shock protein 70: molecular supertool? Ped Nephrol. 2005;20:707–713. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1812-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kielar ML, John R, Bennett M, et al. Maladaptive role of IL-6 in ischemic acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3315–3325. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2003090757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gobe G, Zhang ZJ, Wollgoss DA, et al. Relationship between expression of Bcl-2 genes and growth factors in ischemic acute renal failure in the rat. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:454–467. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V113454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yoshino J, Monkawa T, Tsuji M, Hayashi M, Saruta T. Leukemia inhibitory factor is involved in tubular regeneration after experimental acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:3090–3101. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000101180.96787.02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.du Cheyron D, Daubin C, Poggioli J, et al. Urinary measurement of Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3) protein as new marker of tubule injury in critically ill patients with ARF. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42:497–506. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00744-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Nadasdy T, Laszik Z, Blick KE, et al. Human acute tubular necrosis: a lectin and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:230–239. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Hortin GL, Sviridov D. Diagnostic potential for urinary proteomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8:237–255. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.3.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Gonzalez-Buitrago JM, Ferreira L, Lorenzo I. Urinary Proteomics. Clin Chim Acta. 2007;375:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Fliser D, Novak J, Thongboonkerd V, et al. Advances in urinary proteome analysis and biomarker discovery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1057–1071. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006090956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Clarke W, Silverman BC, Zhang Z, et al. Characterization of renal allograft rejection by urinary proteomic analysis. Anal Surg. 2003;237:660–664. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000064293.57770.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Schaub S, Rush D, Wilkins J, et al. Proteome-based detection of urine proteins associated with acute renal allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:219–227. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000101031.52826.be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Schaub S, Wilkins J, Weiler T, et al. Urine protein profiling with surface-enhanced laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Kidney Int. 2004;65:323–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Nguyen MT, Ross GF, Dent CL, et al. Early prediction of acute renal injury using urinary proteomics. Am J Nephrol. 2005;25:318–326. doi: 10.1159/000086476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Lefler DM, Pafford RG, Black NA, et al. Identification of proteins in slow continuous ultrafiltrate by reversed-phase chromatography and proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2004;3:1254–1260. doi: 10.1021/pr0498640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Zhou H, Pisitkun T, Aponte A, et al. Exosomal fetuin-A identified by proteomics: a novel urinary biomarker for detecting acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1847–1857. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pisitkun T, Shen RF, Knepper MA. Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:13368–13373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403453101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zhou H, Yuen PS, Pisitkun T, et al. Collection, storage, preservation, and normalization of human urinary exosomes for biomarker discovery. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1471–1476. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Molls RM, Savransky V, Liu M, et al. Keratinocyte-derived chemokine is an early biomarker of ischemic acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F1187–F1193. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00342.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Holly MK, Dear JW, Hu X, et al. Biomarker and drug-target discovery using proteomics in a new rat model of sepsis-induced acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2006;70:496–506. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:159–169. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra032401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Melnikov VY, Ecder T, Fantuzzi G, et al. Impaired IL-18 processing protects caspase-1 deficient mice from ischemic acute renal failure. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1145–1152. doi: 10.1172/JCI12089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Parikh CR, Jani A, Melnikov VY, Faubel S, Edelstein CL. Urinary interleukin-18 is a marker of human acute tubular necrosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43:405–414. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Parikh CR, Abraham E, Ancukiewicz M, et al. Urine IL-18 is an early diagnostic marker for acute kidney injury and predicts mortality in the intensive care unit. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3046–3052. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005030236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Herget-Rosenthal S, Poppen D, Husing J, et al. Prognostic value of tubular proteinuria and enzymuria in nonoliguric acute tubular necrosis. Clin Chem. 2004;50:552–558. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.027763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.VandeVoorde RG, Katman TI, Ma Q, et al. Serum NGAL and cystatin C as predictive biomarkers for acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:404A. (abstr) [Google Scholar]