Skip to main content
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 1985 Sep-Oct;32(5):202–205.

Comparison of Periodontal Intraligamental Anesthesia Using Etidocaine HCL and Lidocaine HCL

Georgia K Johnson, Gwen L Hlava, Kenneth L Kalkwarf
PMCID: PMC2175406  PMID: 3866503

Abstract

A double-blind method was used to compare anesthesia duration following intraligamental administration of 1.5% etidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Durations of anesthesia in pulpal and soft tissues were monitored following periodontal ligament injections adjacent to the maxillary canines of 20 individuals. Complete pulpal anesthesia was attained in 35% of the teeth injected with etidocaine and in 55% of those receiving lidocaine. Soft tissue anesthesia was consistently achieved. Both pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia were of longer duration following the use of lidocaine solution. These findings suggest that anesthetic duration following periodontal ligament injections is more related to the concentration of vasoconstrictor than to the anesthetic solution employed.

Full text

PDF
202

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aberg G. Studies on the duration of local anesthesia: a possible mechanism for the prolonging effect of "vasoconstrictors" on the duration of infiltration anesthesia. Int J Oral Surg. 1980 Apr;9(2):144–147. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(80)80051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brannstrom M., Lindskog S., Nordenvall K. J. Enamel hypoplasia in permanent teeth induced by periodontal ligament anesthesia of primary teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Nov;109(5):735–736. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dubose W. J. Intraligamentary anesthesia. J Ala Dent Assoc. 1984 Spring;68(2):19–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Faulkner R. K. The high-pressure periodontal ligament injection. Br Dent J. 1983 Feb 19;154(4):103–105. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fuhs Q. M., Walker W. A., 3rd, Gough R. W., Schindler W. G., Hartman K. S. The periodontal ligament injection: histological effects on the periodontium in dogs. J Endod. 1983 Oct;9(10):411–415. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galili D., Kaufman E., Garfunkel A. A., Michaeli Y. Intraligamentary anesthesia--a histological study. Int J Oral Surg. 1984 Dec;13(6):511–516. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(84)80022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garfunkel A. A., Kaufman E., Marmary Y., Galili D. Intraligamentary--intraosseous anesthesia. A radiographic demonstration. Int J Oral Surg. 1983 Oct;12(5):334–339. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(83)80022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giovannitti J. A., Bennett C. R. The effectiveness of 1.5% etidocaine HCl with epinephrine 1:200,000 and 2% lidocaine HCl with epinephrine 1:100,000 in oral surgery: a clinical comparison. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Oct;107(4):616–618. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaufman E., Galili D., Garfunkel A. A. Intraligamentary anesthesia: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Mar;49(3):337–339. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90273-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaufman E., LeResche L., Sommers E., Dworkin S. F., Truelove E. L. Intraligamentary anesthesia: a double-blind comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Feb;108(2):175–178. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Khedari A. J. Alternative to mandibular block injections through intraligamental anesthesia. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1982 Feb;13(2):231–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lilienthal B., Reynolds A. K. Cardiovascular responses to intraosseous injections containing catecholamines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975 Nov;40(5):574–583. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(75)90366-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malamed S. F. The periodontal ligament (PDL) injection: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Feb;53(2):117–121. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90273-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peterson J. E., Matsson L., Nation W. Cementum and epithelial attachment response to the sulcular and periodontal ligament injection techniques. Pediatr Dent. 1983 Dec;5(4):257–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith G. N., Pashley D. H. Periodontal ligament injection: evaluation of systemic effects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Dec;56(6):571–574. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(83)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith G. N., Walton R. E., Abbott B. J. Clinical evaluation of periodontal ligament anesthesia using a pressure syringe. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Dec;107(6):953–956. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smith G. N., Walton R. E. Periodontal ligament injection: distribution of injected solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Mar;55(3):232–238. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(83)90319-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walton R. E., Abbott B. J. Periodontal ligament injection: a clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981 Oct;103(4):571–575. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Walton R. E., Garnick J. J. The periodontal ligament injection: histologic effects on the periodontium in monkeys. J Endod. 1982 Jan;8(1):22–26. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80312-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES