Abstract
Cellular differentiation is a complex process involving growth arrest, exit from the cell cycle, and expression of differentiated cell-type-specific functions. To identify small molecules promoting this process, a chemical library was screened by using a myeloid leukemic cell line that retained the potential to differentiate in culture. In the presence of a purine derivative, aminopurvalanol (AP), cells acquired phenotypic characteristics of differentiated macrophages and became arrested in the cell cycle with a 4N DNA content. AP also inhibited mitosis in Xenopus egg extracts, suggesting that it acted on an evolutionarily conserved cell cycle regulatory pathway. Affinity chromatography and biochemical reconstitution experiments with Xenopus egg extracts identified cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 1–cyclin B as a target of the compound. Although AP potently inhibited immunoprecipitates of both human CDK1 and CDK2 from human leukemic cell extracts, our results indicate that the compound preferentially targets the G2/M-phase transition in vivo.
Keywords: chemical libraries, cell cycle
To inhibit cancer cell proliferation, therapies have been developed by using natural inducers of cellular differentiation such as all-trans-retinoic acid (RA). Human leukemic cell lines that express phenotypic characteristics of differentiated cells in response to RA have served as model systems to study differentiation-inducing agents (1). Inside the cell, RA binds to a specific RA-receptor protein that modulates transcription, leading to growth arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and expression of differentiation markers (2). When used in combination with cytotoxic drugs, RA has been shown to induce remission in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (3). These observations have stimulated a search for other differentiation-promoting compounds, as possible therapeutic agents and as molecular probes of the cellular differentiation process.
Protein kinases constitute another potential target of differentiation-promoting compounds. The expression and activity of protein kinases regulating cell cycle progression, signal transduction, and gene expression can determine whether a cell differentiates or proliferates to become cancerous (4, 5). Selective kinase inhibitors were previously identified by screening chemical libraries of 2,6,9-substituted purine derivatives, using in vitro phosphorylation reactions with purified kinases (6, 7). Because purines with different substituents have shown specificity toward different kinases (7), we sought to determine whether any compound in the purine library could selectively influence the differentiation process. One purine derivative, aminopurvalanol (AP), was identified based on its ability to promote the expression of differentiated characteristics in human leukemic cells. Using a biochemical depletion-reconstitution approach with extracts from Xenopus eggs, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 1 was identified as a functional target of the compound.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals and Reagents.
All compounds were obtained from Sigma/Aldrich, unless otherwise indicated.
Cell Culture.
Human U937 leukemic cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium plus 20% FCS. Cells were kept at 37°C in 5%CO2/95% air.
Chemical Synthesis.
Detailed procedures for AP, trimethyl-AP, and synthetic intermediates are described in the supplemental data published on the PNAS web site (www.pnas.org). P-Matrix was synthesized from commercially available 2-amino-6-chloropurine. 2-Amino-6-chloropurine was converted to 2-fluoro-6-chloro-9-isopropylpurine by using an aqueous fluoroboric acid diazotization procedure followed by a regioselective N-9 alkylation with 2-propanol under Mitsunobu conditions. The 6 position was then substituted with 4-amino-2-chlorobenzoic acid, followed by substitution at the 2 position with (R)-valinol. The resulting 2-(1R)-(isopropyl-2-hydroxyethylamino)-6-(3-chloro-4-carboxyanilino)-9-isopropylpurine was coupled to 1-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-1,8-diamino-3,6-dioxaoctane by using diisopropylcarbodiimide. The Boc group was removed with trifluoroacetic acid and the resulting primary amino group was coupled to carbonylimidazole-activated agarose (Reacti-GelR Pierce, product 20259). C-matrix was prepared identically except no amination is performed at the C-2 position.
Differentiation Assay.
An in-house synthetic library of diverse 2,6,9-substituted purine derivatives was used for screening. Compounds in 10 mM DMSO stocks were diluted to 10 μM in cell growth medium. Approximately 2 × 104 cells were seeded per well. DMSO (0.1%) was added to negative controls and 10 μM RA was added to positive controls. Cells were allowed to grow and differentiate for 4 days at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air.
Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT) Assay.
To a 100-μl cell suspension, an equal volume of RPMI 1640 medium containing NBT at 1 mg/ml (Pierce) and 300 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was added to activate the cells, and cells were then incubated for 2.5 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. The fraction of cells containing blue formazan deposits was determined with a microscope, using transmitted light illumination and ×200 magnification. Between 50 and 100 randomly selected cells were counted from each sample.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) Assay.
MTT (1 mg/ml) was added to the cell suspension and incubated for 2 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere. After the incubation period, the blue formazan product was solubilized as described (8). Absorbance was measured at 550 nm with an EAR400-AT plate reader (SLT Labinstruments, Research Triangle Park, NC).
Apoptosis Assays.
For terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated UTP end labeling (TUNEL) assays, cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. For labeling, cells were incubated with 50 μl of TUNEL reaction mixture (in situ cell death detection kit, fluorescein; Boehringer Mannheim) plus 5 μl of RNase A at 3 mg/ml (Boehringer Mannheim), at 37°C for 1.5 h. At that time, 1 ml of propidium iodide (PI; Molecular Probes) at 0.04 mg/ml in PBS was added, and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. For assaying DNA fragmentation patterns, cells were harvested and resuspended in 10 mM Tris⋅HCl, pH7.5/10 mM EDTA/0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 h. Debris was removed by centrifugation. Fragmented DNA in supernatant was precipitated with 2.5 vol of EtOH and 0.5 vol 7.5 M ammonium acetate overnight at −20°C. DNA was spun down, washed two times with 80% EtOH, and resuspended in TE buffer containing RNase A at 20 μg/ml for 30 min at 37°C. DNA was electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide under UV illumination.
CD11b Staining.
To assay for expression of CD11b, 5 × 105 cells were suspended in 100 μl of PBS containing 150 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, 1% BSA, and 10 μl of FITC-labeled anti-CD11b monoclonal antibody, at 37°C for 45 min. After fixing with 1.5 ml of 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min. After permeabilization, cells were incubated in a solution of RNase A at 0.5 mg/ml in PBS at 37°C for 30 min. Cells were resuspended in PI at 0.04 mg/ml in PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Flow Cytometry and Cell Cycle Analysis.
FITC- and PI-stained cells were analyzed by using a Coulter instrument. For each experiment, more than 50,000 cells were analyzed. Cell cycle distributions were calculated with the multicycle program (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego). After flow cytometric analysis, PI-stained cells were observed with a rhodamine filter set, on a Zeiss Axioskop microscope using ×1,000 magnification. In each sample, at least 100 randomly-selected cells were counted for the presence of cells with condensed chromosomes to determine the fraction of cells in mitosis.
Xenopus Egg Extracts.
We prepared cytostatic factor-arrested extracts (CSF) as detailed (9) with the exceptions that cytochalasin D was used in place of cytochalasin B and a versilube overlay was not used during the crushing spin. For high-speed extract, fresh CSF extract was spun at 150,000 × g in a TLA-100.3 ultracentrifuge rotor (Beckman) for 30 min at 4°C.
Spindle Assay.
Spindle assembly assays were performed as described (10). For addition experiments, AP, demembranated sperm nuclei, and rhodamine-labeled tubulin were added to fresh extracts and incubated for 45 min at 20°C. For matrix-treatment experiments, fresh extracts were incubated with either active or control matrices for 30 min at 4°C. After spinning out matrices, recovered extracts were incubated with sperm nuclei and rhodamine-labeled tubulin for 45 min at 20°C. For rescue experiments, pure CDK1–cyclin B obtained from H. Wilhelm (11) with an activity of 93 pmol per min per μl was added at 0.1 vol to matrix-treated extract.
Spindle assembly was assayed by spinning extracts onto coverslips (10) except that centrifugation was done at 10,000 rpm in an HB-6 rotor (Sorvall) for 12 min at 16°C. After fixation in −20°C methanol, coverslips were washed once with PBS/Nonidet P-40, stained with Hoechst 38258 to visualize DNA, and washed four times with PBS/Nonidet P-40. After mounting on glass slides, coverslips were analyzed and imaged with a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope and a cooled charge-coupled device camera (Technical Instruments, San Francisco).
Histone H1 Kinase Assays.
Histone H1 kinase assays were based on published methods (12) except that EB buffer was prepared without PMSF. Extract was diluted 1:20 in EB, flash-frozen, and stored at −80°C. Kinase activity was assayed by incubating 5 μl of sample with 5 μl of assay mixture: 0.75× EB with histone H1 (Boehringer Mannheim) at 2 mg/ml, 0.6 mM ATP, and [γ-32P]ATP (Amersham) at 0.1 μCi/μl (1 Ci = 37 GBq). Incubations ran for 15 min at which time 6 μl of each incubation was blotted onto squares of P81 phosphocellulose paper (Whatman). Squares were then washed three times with 150 mM H3PO4, washed once with EtOH, dried, and loaded into scintillation vials with scintillation fluid. Radioactivity was measured on the 32P cycle in an LSC scintillation counter (Beckman).
DNA Replication Assays.
Linearized plasmid DNA (0.3 μg) immobilized on magnetic beads (Dynal) was incubated in 30 μl of interphase extract at 20°C for 2 h in the presence of 5 μCi of [32P]dCTP (13), and 200 or 300 μM AP, aphidicolin at 50 μg/ml, or 0.01 vol of DMSO was added at the beginning of the reaction. Beads were retrieved on magnets, washed extensively with 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.6/3 mM MgCl2/0.5 mM EGTA/0.05% Triton X-100, then transferred to scintillation vials containing scintillation fluid. Radioactivity was measured on the 32P cycle in an LSC.
Gel and Immunoblot Analysis.
High-speed extract samples were analyzed by silver stain or immunoblot and resolved on a 10% SDS/polyacrylamide gel. Crude extract protein samples analyzed by immunoblot were resolved on 12% SDS/polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose (Schleicher & Schuell), and processed for ECL (Amersham). CDK1 was detected with a mouse monoclonal antibody (clone A17.1.1, Calbiochem) raised against Xenopus CDK1. CDK2 was detected with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Daniel Donoghue, Univ. of California, San Diego) raised against Xenopus CDK2.
CDK Immunoprecipitation.
For CDK2 immunoprecipitation, 1.5 × 108 U937 cells were grown in proliferation medium to a concentration of 5 × 105 cells per ml. For CDK1 immunoprecipitation, the cell population was synchronized in mitosis with 1 μM Taxol for 16 h. All procedures were carried out at 4°C. Cells were harvested, resuspended in an equal volume of EB, and homogenized by using a syringe, with 15 strokes through a 26.5-gauge needle. After homogenization, another volume of EB plus 1% Triton X-100 was added to the cell suspension and left to incubate for 30 min. Nuclei and debris were then removed by centrifugation. Supernatant was transferred into a different tube and incubated with 50 μl of anti-CDK2 (M2)-G (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or 50 μl of anti-CDC2 p34 (17) -agarose conjugate (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h with continuous agitation. The matrix was then washed with EB, and CDK1 or CDK2 activity was monitored by using histone H1 kinase assays.
RESULTS
U937 cells (14, 15) were used to screen for purine derivatives affecting cellular differentiation. Initially, 150 diverse compounds (6) were assayed for their ability to induce the expression of NBT-reducing activity, a characteristic of differentiated macrophages and neutrophils. Only one compound in the library, AP (Fig. 1), consistently induced NBT-reducing activity in U937 cells to levels similar to those induced by retinoic acid (Fig. 2A). To characterize the biological activity of AP, its effects on the cellular differentiation process were examined in greater detail.
Dose–response analysis revealed that AP acted in two ways to promote the differentiated phenotype: by inducing expression of NBT-reducing activity (Fig. 2 A and C) and by inhibiting growth of undifferentiated cells (Fig. 2B). At 5 μM, the compound decreased the viability of proliferating U937 cells by 26% (P < 0.001, n = 4, t test), but it affected the viability of RA-differentiated U937 cells by only 6% (P < =0.02, n = 5; t test). At higher concentrations, AP was cytotoxic, decreasing the number of cells at the end of the experiment. These results indicated that AP acted both directly and indirectly to promote growth of cells with the differentiated phenotype.
AP also induced the expression of the CD11b integrin, another differentiation marker. Flow cytometry analysis of cells costained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD11b antibodies and PI was used to quantify the level of CD11b expression and DNA content, respectively. Untreated samples displayed a range of DNA contents characteristic of proliferating cell populations, and few cells stained positive for CD11b (Fig. 2D). In contrast, 5 μM AP increased the fraction of cells with a 4N DNA content, and the majority of these cells stained positive for CD11b (Fig. 2E). AP also induced cellular fragmentation indicative of cell death. To determine whether the effects of AP were specific to the drug, an N-methylated derivative of AP (trimethyl-AP; Fig. 1) was subjected to the same assays. Trimethyl-AP did not increase the fraction of cells expressing CD11b nor did it cause a change in the range of the DNA distribution in the cell population (Fig. 2F).
AP inhibited cell growth primarily by arresting the cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle and, at higher concentration, triggered apoptosis. The presence of apoptotic nuclei in AP-treated cells was determined in conjunction with the cellular DNA content using flow cytometry. DNA was stained with PI, and apoptotic nuclei were detected with the TUNEL assay, in which fluorescent nucleotides are enzymatically incorporated onto the ends of DNA fragments resulting from the apoptotic process (16). In these experiments, 5 μM AP increased the number of cells with a 4N DNA content as early as 8 h after the beginning of treatment (Fig. 3 A and B). Under the same conditions, doses higher than 10 μM led to cellular fragmentation and cells with an irregular DNA distribution, characteristic of apoptotic cell populations (Fig. 3C). These observations were supported by the results obtained with the TUNEL assay (Fig. 3 D–F), indicating that apoptosis was not directly induced by the drug at doses that promoted cellular differentiation.
In dose–response and time course experiments, AP treatment caused a progressive increase in the G2/M-phase fraction with a concomitant decrease in the G1-phase fraction (Fig. 3 G and H). The S-phase fraction remained relatively constant during the course of the experiment, indicating that the G1/S and S/G2 transitions proceeded normally in the presence of the drug, at concentrations that promoted cellular differentiation. To distinguish between a block in G2 and M phase, cells stained with PI were scored morphologically by fluorescence microscopy for the presence of condensed chromosomes characteristic of mitotic cells. In control cells, 5% of the population was in mitosis, whereas in the AP-treated cells, less than 1% of the population was in mitosis (values ±1%; n = 3), indicating that AP induces a specific G2-phase block.
The cell cycle arrest induced by AP raised the possibility that the compound interfered with the function of CDK1, which regulates entry into mitosis. In animal cells, S phase is induced by CDK2 complexed with S-phase cyclins (E and A types), and M phase is induced by CDK1 complexed with M-phase cyclins (A and B types) (17). To identify the molecular mechanism behind AP action, we performed experiments with Xenopus egg extracts. In addition to providing a biochemically tractable system, Xenpus egg extracts can progress through both interphase and mitotic cell cycle states in which many cellular processes such as DNA replication and mitotic spindle assembly are faithfully executed in vitro (18, 19). Because the biochemical machinery regulating cell cycle progression is highly conserved from yeast to human (20), we reasoned that Xenopus egg extracts could be used to investigate in more detail the AP-induced cell cycle defects and identify targets of AP action.
AP inhibited mitosis when added to Xenopus egg extracts (18). In control reactions, Xenopus sperm nuclei nucleated polarized microtubule arrays around condensed chromosomes, forming “half spindles” that fused pair-wise to form bipolar spindles (Fig. 4A). In contrast, reactions treated with 200 μM AP were characterized by partially decondensed sperm nuclei and extensive long microtubules characteristic of interphase extracts (Fig. 4B). Histone H1 kinase activity, used as a measure of CDK1 activity, was reduced to interphasic levels in AP-treated extracts. The effects of the compound appeared to be dose dependent. In the presence of 100 μM AP, kinase activity was reduced to an intermediate level. Although spindles did not form, some microtubule organization was apparent as large disorganized astral arrays. At 40 μM AP, mitotic spindle structures formed with less severe effects on morphology and histone H1 kinase activity (data not shown).
To identify the molecular target of AP, an affinity matrix was constructed by using a close structural analogue of AP bearing a para-carboxyl group attached via a short linker to an agarose-based solid support (P-matrix; Fig. 1). As a negative control, a matrix was prepared with an inactive derivative of AP containing a fluorine at the 2 position of the purine ring (C-matrix; Fig. 1). C-matrix treatment had no effect on mitotic spindle assembly or histone H1 kinase activity in extracts (Fig. 4C), whereas P-matrix inhibited mitosis and histone H1 kinase activity in a dose-dependent fashion, similar to the free compound (Fig. 4D). To identify the cellular targets of the active compound, proteins bound specifically to P-matrix were characterized. SDS/PAGE analysis of proteins eluted from P-matrix and C-matrix revealed a number of proteins bound to both matrices, but with one protein of about 34 kDa specifically bound to the P-matrix (Fig. 5A). Western blot analysis identified this P-matrix-specific band as CDK1 (Fig. 5B). Pretreatment of extracts with AP significantly reduced the amount CDK1 bound to P-matrix, indicating that the free compound could compete with P-matrix for CDK1 binding (Fig. 5D). These results suggested that AP interacts with and inhibits CDK1 activity, resulting in mitotic inhibition.
Unexpectedly, a significant amount of CDK1 remained in P-matrix-treated extracts, indicating that not all of the CDK1 was bound by the P-matrix (Fig. 5B). However, the remaining CDK1 was not active as assayed by histone H1 kinase activity, indicating that it was in a state devoid of catalytic activity. Because mitotic CDK1 activation requires association with cyclin B, which is less abundant than CDK1 in Xenopus egg cytoplasm (19), we assayed cyclin B levels by Western blot analysis. Cyclin B was also found to be associated with P-matrix but not C-matrix but was not completely depleted from extracts by P-matrix treatment (Fig. 5C and data not shown). These results indicate that P-matrix binds active CDK1–cyclin B complexes. Because P-matrix can bind CDK1 in interphase extracts lacking cyclin B (data not shown), the association of the kinase complex appears to be through the purine-binding catalytic CDK1 subunit.
To probe whether P-matrix depletion was specific for CDK1 and M-phase induction, C- and P-matrices were analyzed on Western blots with anti-CDK2 antibodies. Similar amounts of CDK2 bound to both C- and P-matrices, indicating that AP interaction with CDK2 was less specific than with CDK1 (Fig. 5E). To determine whether AP interfered with S-phase progression by binding CDK2, DNA replication was measured in interphase extracts containing the compound (Fig. 5G). [32P]dCTP was incorporated into immobilized plasmid DNA in the presence of up to 300 μM AP but was inhibited by aphidicolin at 50 μg/ml. Therefore, although AP bound to some CDK2 in the extract, it did not have a significant effect on the physiological activity of CDK2 in promoting S-phase progression. This result is consistent with the effects of the compound on U937 cells, which results in G2- but not G1- or S-phase arrest.
To test whether CDK1–cyclin B was the only activity required for mitotic progression removed from the extract by P-matrix, purified Xenopus CDK1–cyclin B was added back to the depleted extract. CDK1–cyclin B was prepared by adding cyclin B-glutathione S-transferase (GST) to Xenopus extracts and retrieving CDK1–cyclin B-GST on glutathione-agarose beads. The complex was further purified by mono S chromatography (11). In either an interphasic extract or a P-matrix-treated extract, approximately 70% of added sperm nuclei formed spindle arrays 45 min after addition of CDK1–cyclin B (Fig. 4E). Western blot analysis indicated that CDK1 protein was restored to levels found in C-matrix-treated extracts (Fig. 5F). Therefore, CDK1–cyclin B addition rescued spindle assembly and chromosome condensation in P-matrix-depleted extracts. This result is consistent with experiments showing that CDK1–cyclin B controls the passage of the cell cycle from G2 phase into mitosis (18, 19), indicating that AP binds and inactivates CDK1 in Xenopus egg extracts.
To determine whether CDK1 was also a target of AP in human cells, the compound was tested in histone H1 kinase assays using CDK1 and CDK2 immunoprecipitates from U937 cell extracts. In these assays, AP potently inhibited the activity of CDK1 (IC50 = 196 ± 31 nM) and CDK2 (IC50 = 28 ± 14 nM). To test whether AP inhibited CDK1 or CDK2 activity in vivo, the activity of both kinases was assayed in immunoprecipitates of U937 cell extracts obtained after treating proliferating cell populations with 5 μM AP for 1 h. Compared with untreated cell populations, the compound inhibited the in vivo activity of CDK1 and CDK2 by 43% (SEM = ±13%, n = 5) and 66% (SEM = ±8%, n = 5), respectively. Therefore, AP inhibits CDK1 and CDK2 activity in U937 cells both in vivo and in vitro, with a greater potency toward CDK2. However, because AP preferentially inhibits G2- to M-phase progression, the activity of CDK1–cyclin B appears to be the primary functional target of AP.
DISCUSSION
We have identified a unique CDK1/CDK2 inhibitor, AP, that promotes the expression of phenotypic markers characteristic of RA-differentiated U937 cells. Whereas RA induces U937 cell cycle arrest predominantly in G1 phase, AP causes cell cycle arrest in G2 phase, indicating that certain aspects of the differentiation process can be uncoupled from the stage at which cells exit the cell cycle and from the cellular DNA content. Although AP could block mitosis by inhibiting CDK1 directly, our results cannot exclude a role for CDK2 inhibition in the mechanism of G2 arrest, especially since CDK2 is active during G2 and may help activate CDK1 (21, 22). Consistent with a direct role for CDK inhibition in promoting expression of the differentiated phenotype, ectopic expression of the CDK inhibitors p21 or p27 in U937 cells also results in the acquisition differentiated phenotypes and arrest in the G1 or G2 phase of the cell cycle (23).
To identify the target of AP action, we used Xenopus egg extracts, a biochemically tractable system that retains the ability to progress through the entire cell cycle in vitro. The effect of the drug to block extracts in interphase was consistent with the G2-phase cell cycle arrest in U937 cells. However, much higher concentrations of the drug were required in extracts. General differences in the potency of pharmacological inhibitors in Xenopus egg extracts vs. cells in culture are common and can be ascribed to the partitioning of the compounds into the protein and lipid phase of the extract, decreasing the effective concentration of free compound in solution. Nevertheless, we could demonstrate the specificity of the compound in this system by reconstituting affinity-matrix-treated extracts by addition of purified CDK1–cyclin B. Because Xenopus egg extracts can be modified to assay other cell cycle transitions (24), this biochemical depletion-reconstitution strategy can be used to identify the cellular targets of other small molecules affecting cellular differentiation and cell cycle progression.
The potent inhibition of U937 CDK1 and CDK2 immunoprecipitates by AP suggests that the activity of these kinases can influence the cellular differentiation process. Unlike the response of other mammalian cell lines to small molecule CDK inhibitors (25), U937 cells respond to low doses of AP by arresting in the cell cycle without undergoing apoptosis. This inhibition of cell growth might lead to the expression of differentiated characteristics by slowing down the cell cycle and thereby increasing the probability that a cell will take an alternative developmental pathway. Alternatively, inhibiting CDK1/CDK2 activity could directly affect transcriptional activity, leading to changes in gene expression patterns that alter the balance between proliferation and expression of the differentiated phenotype (26, 27). These two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and both may contribute to the manifestation of differentiated phenotypic characteristics of U937 cells treated with AP.
In cells and extracts, AP treatment causes arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle without a major effect on the G1/S phase. One explanation could be that G1/S-phase progression is quantitatively less sensitive to CDK2 inhibition than G2/M- phase progression is to CDK1 inhibition (28). Alternatively, the transformed phenotype of U937 cells could result in specific changes in cell cycle regulation. As many other cell lines originating from human tumors, U937 human leukemic cells express different cyclins in an unscheduled fashion (29, 30). Thus, we propose that abnormalities in the biochemical mechanism governing cell cycle progression in cancer cells could account for differences in the levels of CDK inhibition required to arrest cells at the G1/S or G2/M-phase transitions.
To conclude, the expression of differentiated characteristics in U937 cells treated with AP indicates that small molecule CDK inhibitors can be used to alter the balance between cell growth and differentiation in cancer cells. The ability of AP to induce CD11b expression and NBT-reducing activity in human leukemic cells suggests that the effect of CDK inhibition goes beyond the cell cycle. AP should be useful for elucidating the role of CDK activity in the regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression, in normal and transformed cells.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank H. Wilhelm (European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg) for pure CDK1–cyclin B and anti-cyclin B monoclonal antibodies and Dr. Daniel Donoghue for anti-CDK2 antibodies. Y.T.C. acknowledges the financial support of the Korea Research Foundation made in the program year 1997.
ABBREVIATIONS
- AP
aminopurvalanol
- RA
all-trans-retinoic acid
- CDK
cyclin-dependent kinase
- NBT
nitroblue tetrazolium
- TUNEL
terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated UTP end labeling
- PI
propidium iodide
References
- 1.Breitman T, Selonick D, Collins S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:2936–2940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Love J M, Gudas L J. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:825–831. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tallman M S, Andersen J W, Schiffer C A, Appelbaum F R, Feusner J H, Ogden A, Shepherd L, Willman C, Bloomfield C D, Rowe J M, Wiernick P H. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1021–1028. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710093371501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baghdassarian N, French M. Hematol Cell Ther. 1996;38:313–323. doi: 10.1007/s00282-996-0313-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnson G L, Vaillancourt R R. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:230–238. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meijer L, Kim S H. Methods Enzymol. 1997;283:113–128. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)83011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gray N S, Wodicka L, Thunnissen A-M, Norman T C, Kwon S, Espinoza F H, Morgan D O, Barnes G, LeClerc S, Meijer L, et al. Science. 1998;281:533–538. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5376.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hansen M B, Nielsen S E, Berg K. J Immunol Methods. 1989;119:203–210. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90397-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murray A W. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;36:581–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sawin K E, Mitchison T J. J Cell Biol. 1991;112:925–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.5.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wilhelm H, Anderson S S L, Karsenti E. Methods Enzymol. 1997;283:12–28. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(97)83004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Felix M A, Pines J, Hunt T, Karsenti E. EMBO J. 1989;8:3059–3069. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08457.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Heald R, Tournebize R, Blank T, Sandaltzopoulos R, Becker P, Hyman A, Karsenti E. Nature (London) 1996;382:420–425. doi: 10.1038/382420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sundstrom C, Nilsson K. Int J Cancer. 1976;17:565–577. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910170504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harris P, Ralph P. J Leukocyte Biol. 1985;37:407–422. doi: 10.1002/jlb.37.4.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gorczyca W, Bruno S, Yi P-N, Darzynkiewicz Z. Cancer Res. 1993;52:1945–1955. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nigg E A. Bioessays. 1995;17:471–480. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murray A W, Kirschner M W. Nature (London) 1989;339:275–280. doi: 10.1038/339275a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murray A W, Solomon M J, Kirschner M W. Nature (London) 1989;339:280–286. doi: 10.1038/339280a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lew D J, Dulic V, Reed S I. Cell. 1991;66:1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90042-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guadgno T M, Newport J. Cell. 1996;84:73–82. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80994-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rosenblatt J, Gu Y, Morgan D O. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:2824–2828. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu M, Lee M H, Cohen M, Bommakanti M, Freedman L P. Genes Dev. 1996;10:142–153. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.2.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Smythe C, Newport J. Methods Cell Biol. 1992;35:449–468. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60583-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schutte B, Nieland L, van Engeland M, Henfling M E R, Meijer L, Ramaekers F C. Exp Cell Res. 1997;236:4–15. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Robles S J, Shiyanov P, Aristodemo G T, Raychaudhuri P, Adami G R. DNA Cell Biol. 1998;17:9–18. doi: 10.1089/dna.1998.17.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sidle A, Palaty C, Dirks P, Wiggan O, Kiess M, Gill R, Wong A K, Hamel P A. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;31:237–271. doi: 10.3109/10409239609106585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stern B, Nurse P. Trends Genet. 1996;12:345–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gong J, Ardelt B, Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4285–4288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hunter T, Pines J. Cell. 1994;79:573–582. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90543-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.