Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 Oct 31;130(5):1093–1105. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.5.1093

COMPARISON OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSIVENESS OF NZB AND NZB x NZW F1 HYBRID MICE WITH THAT OF OTHER STRAINS OF MICE

Jean-Charles Cerottini 1, Paul-Henri Lambert 1, Frank J Dixon 1
PMCID: PMC2180489  PMID: 4186796

Abstract

The immune responsiveness of (NZB x NZW) F1 hybrid mice (NZB/W) has been compared with that of three other strains of mice, A/J, BALB/c, and CBA/J. The antigens used included sheep red blood cells (SRBC), keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and human γ-globulin (HGG). It was found that important strain differences existed in the amount of antibody produced, but the relative immune responsiveness depended very much upon the nature of antigen. By comparison with the other strains tested, NZB/W mice had a higher antibody production to some antigens (SRBC and BSA) but were low responders to others (KLH). Induction of unresponsiveness to HGG by treatment with ultracentrifuged HGG was studied in the strains cited above. NZB/W mice became tolerant after injection of HGG ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g for 2 hr. Similar experiments carried out with another preparation of HGG (centrifuged at 20,000 g for 30 min) failed to reveal any abnormal behavior of NZB/W mice as compared to BALB/c or A/J mice. These results do not support the concept that NZB/W mice possess a general immune hyperreactivity or a relative inability to be made tolerant to protein antigens. However, they do not rule out the possibility that these mice have a genetically determined hyperresponsiveness to some antigens, in particular to nuclear antigens.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (748.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albright J. F., Makinodan T. Growth and senescence of antibody-forming cells. J Cell Physiol. 1966 Jun;67(3 Suppl):185+–185+. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040670415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHRISTIAN C. L. Studies of aggregated gamma-globulin. I. Sedimentation, electrophoretic and anticomplementary properties. J Immunol. 1960 Jan;84:112–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cerottini J. C. An antigen-binding capacity test for human immunoglobulin G (IgG) fragments. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):433–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cerottini J. C., Fitch F. Complement-fixing ability and antibody activity of rabbit F(ab')2 antibody. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1968;34(2):188–200. doi: 10.1159/000230109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DAVIDSOHN I., STERN K. Heterohemoantibodies in inbred strains of mice. II. Immune agglutinins and hemolysins for sheep and chicken red cells. J Immunol. 1954 Mar;72(3):216–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DIETRICH F. M., WEIGLE W. O. Induction of tolerance to heterologous proteins and their catabolism in C57BL/6 mice. J Exp Med. 1963 Apr 1;117:621–631. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.4.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diener E. The immune response in NZB and NZB x C3H F1-hybrid mice as measured by the haemolysin plaque technique. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;30(2):120–131. doi: 10.1159/000229801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dixon F. J., Jacot-Guillarmod H., McConahey P. J. The antibody responses of rabbits and rats to hemocyanin. J Immunol. 1966 Sep;97(3):350–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans M. M., Williamson W. G., Irvine W. J. The appearance of immunological competence at an early age in New Zealand black mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1968 Jun;3(5):375–383. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FARR R. S. A quantitative immunochemical measure of the primary interaction between I BSA and antibody. J Infect Dis. 1958 Nov-Dec;103(3):239–262. doi: 10.1093/infdis/103.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FINK M. A., QUINN V. A. Antibody production in inbred strains of mice. J Immunol. 1953 Jan;70(1):61–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FRIEDMAN H. DISTRIBUTION OF ANTIBODY PLAQUE FORMING CELLS IN VARIOUS TISSUES OF SEVERAL STRAINS OF MICE INJECTED WITH SHEEP ERYTHROCYTES. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Nov;117:526–530. doi: 10.3181/00379727-117-29628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Golub E. S., Weigle W. O. Studies on the induction of immunologic unresponsiveness. 3. Antigen form and mouse strain variation. J Immunol. 1969 Feb;102(2):389–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Howie J. B., Helyer B. J. The immunology and pathology of NZB mice. Adv Immunol. 1968;9:215–266. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60444-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. IPSEN J. Differences in primary and secondary immunizability of inbred mice strains. J Immunol. 1959 Oct;83:448–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambert P. H., Dixon F. J. Pathogenesis of the glomerulonephritis of NZB/W mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Mar 1;127(3):507–522. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.3.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McConahey P. J., Dixon F. J. A method of trace iodination of proteins for immunologic studies. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;29(2):185–189. doi: 10.1159/000229699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morton J. I., Siegel B. V. Response of NZB mice to foreign antigen and development of autoimmune disease. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1969 Feb;6(1):78–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Playfair J. H. Strain differences in the immune response of mice. I. The neonatal response to sheep red cells. Immunology. 1968 Jul;15(1):35–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. ROTHBERG R., TALMAGE D. W. Circulating antibody and anaphylaxis in mice. J Immunol. 1961 Mar;86:302–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SCHEIDEGGER J. J. Une micro-méthode de l'immuno-electrophorèse. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1955;7(2):103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salomon J. C., Benveniste J. The immune response in NZBxNZW F1 hybrid mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 Feb;4(2):213–225. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Staples P. J., Talal N. Rapid loss of tolerance induced in weanling NZB and B-W F1 mice. Science. 1969 Mar 14;163(3872):1215–1216. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3872.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Staples P. J., Talal N. Relative inability to induce tolerance in adult NZB and NZB-NZW F1 mice. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):123–139. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stutman O., Yunis E. J., Good R. A. Deficient immunologic functions of NZB mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Apr;127(4):1204–1207. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. WEIGLE W. O. IMMUNOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF HEMOCYANIN. Immunochemistry. 1964 Dec;1:295–302. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(64)90030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Warner N. L., Vaz N. M., Ovary Z. Immunoglobulin classes in antibody responses in mice. I. Analysis by biological properties. Immunology. 1968 May;14(5):725–734. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. YAGI Y., MAIER P., PRESSMAN D., ARBESMAN C. E., REISMAN R. E. THE PRESENCE OF THE RAGWEED-BINDING ANTIBODIES IN THE BETA-2A, BETA-2M, AND GAMMA GLOBULINS OF THE SENSITIVE INDIVIDUALS. J Immunol. 1963 Jul;91:83–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES