Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 Oct 31;130(5):1003–1029. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.5.1003

REGULATION OF THE SECONDARY ANTIBODY RESPONSE IN VITRO

ENHANCEMENT BY ACTINOMYCIN D AND INHIBITION BY A MACROMOLECULAR PRODUCT OF STIMULATED LYMPH NODE CULTURES

Charles T Ambrose 1
PMCID: PMC2180492  PMID: 5347691

Abstract

Two opposite effects of actinomycin D on antibody synthesis have been studied in organ cultures of rabbit lymph node fragments. These cultures were prepared from previously primed rabbits and stimulated with antigen(s) on day 0 to yield a secondary response, whose inductive phase extended to about day 9 and whose productive phase may last for several months in the serum-free medium described here. Concentrations of actinomycin D above 0.01 µM (0.012 µg/ml) produce inhibition of antibody synthesis during both phases of the response. However, antibody synthesis is about 10 times more sensitive to inhibition by this drug when it is added during the inductive phase than during the productive phase. During the latter phase, synthesis is more rapidly terminated as the drug level approaches 10 /µM (12.5 µg/ml). At this level the 50% synthesis time is about 2.8 hr, which is identical with that found when 5–10 µM puromycin is added to the medium of parallel cultures. Transient enhancement of antibody synthesis is frequently produced by a brief exposure to low levels of actinomycin D (generally less than 0.01 µM). Enhancement appears in precise temporal association with actinomycin pulses added for 2 days or less only between days 6 and 16. This apparent enhancement of antibody synthesis resembles the increased enzyme synthesis described by Garren et al. (6) and led to a search for an antibody-inhibitory material (AIM) whose synthesis might be stopped preferentially by low levels of the drug. Stimulated lymph node cultures produce between days 6 and 15 a nondialyzable material which inhibits antibody synthesis during the productive phase of heterologous antigen-antibody culture systems. Just as enhancement with low levels of actinomycin D appears within 2 hr after the drug has been added to cultures, so inhibition occurs within 4 hr of adding AIM to cultures during their productive phase. These observations suggest that AIM is analogous to the translational "repressor" postulated by Garren et al. (6). AIM has relevance in two areas of immunology: (a) it may be the explanation for many examples of antigenic competition, and (b) it may represent a normal control mechanism for the productive phase.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMBROSE C. T. THE REQUIREMENT FOR HYDROCORTISONE IN ANTIBODY-FORMING TISSUE CULTIVATED IN SERUM-FREE MEDIUM. J Exp Med. 1964 Jan 1;119:1027–1049. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.6.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSON S. G. THE PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY IN THE PRESENCE OF INTERFERON. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1965 Jul;43:345–350. doi: 10.1038/icb.1965.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COLEMAN G., ELLIOTT W. H. STIMULATION OF EXTRACELLULAR RIBONUCLEASE FORMATION IN B. SUBTILIS BY ACTINOMYCIN D. Nature. 1964 Jun 13;202:1083–1085. doi: 10.1038/2021083a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CRAIG L. C. DIFFERENTIAL DIALYSIS. Science. 1964 May 29;144(3622):1093–1099. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3622.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Corte E. D., Stirpe F. Regulation of xanthine dehydrogenase in chick liver. Further experiments on the effects of inosine, actinomycin D and other factors. Biochem J. 1967 Feb;102(2):520–524. doi: 10.1042/bj1020520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ernster L., Orrenius S. Substrate-induced synthesis of the hydroxylating enzyme system of liver microsomes. Fed Proc. 1965 Sep-Oct;24(5):1190–1199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GARREN L. D., HOWELL R. R., TOMKINS G. M., CROCCO R. M. A PARADOXICAL EFFECT OF ACTINOMYCIN D: THE MECHANISM OF REGULATION OF ENZYME SYNTHESIS BY HYDROCORTISONE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Oct;52:1121–1129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.52.4.1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris G. Antibody production in vitro. II. Effects of actinomycin D and puromycin on the secondary response to sheep erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Apr 1;127(4):675–691. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.4.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kenney F. T. Turnover of rat liver tyrosine transaminase: stabilization after inhibition of protein synthesis. Science. 1967 Apr 28;156(3774):525–528. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3774.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LIN E. C., KNOX W. E. Adaptation of the rat liver tyrosine-alpha-ketoglutarate transaminase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Oct;26(1):85–88. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MCAUSLAN B. R. THE INDUCTION AND REPRESSION OF THYMIDINE KINASE IN THE POXVIRUS-INFECTED HELA CELL. Virology. 1963 Nov;21:383–389. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(63)90199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MEDZON E. L., VAS S. I. STUDIES ON IN VITRO ANTIBODY PRODUCTION. II. THE EFFECT OF NEWCASTLE DISEASE VIRUS ON ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS. Can J Microbiol. 1964 Aug;10:535–541. doi: 10.1139/m64-067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MICHAELIDES M. C., COONS A. H. Studies on antibody production. V. The secondary response in vitro. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:1035–1051. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mazzur S. R., Paucker K. Studies on the effect of interferon on the formation of antibody in mouse spleen cells. II. The effect of interferon on antibody plaque formation and antibody production by transferred spleen cells. J Immunol. 1967 Apr;98(4):689–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mowbray J. F., Hargrave D. C. Further studies on the preparation of the immunosuppressive alpha-2 protein fraction from the serum and its assay in mice. Immunology. 1966 Nov;11(5):413–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mowbray J. F., Scholand J. Inhibition of antibody production by ribonucleases. Immunology. 1966 Nov;11(5):421–426. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. POLLOCK M. R. THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF ACTINOMYCIN D ON THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF ENZYMES IN BACILLUS SUBTILIS AND BACILLUS CEREUS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Sep 17;76:80–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Papaconstantinou J., Stewart J. A., Koehn P. V. A localized stimulation of lens protein synthesis by actinomycin D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Feb 21;114(2):428–430. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(66)90328-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pullar D. M., James K., Naysmith J. D. The effect of an alpha-globulin preparation and of polyribonuclease complexes on humoral antibody formation. Clin Exp Immunol. 1968 Jun;3(5):457–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. ROSEN F., RAINA P. N., MILHOLLAND R. J., NICHOL C. A. INDUCTION OF SEVERAL ADAPTIVE ENZYMES BY ACTINOMYCIN D. Science. 1964 Oct 30;146(3644):661–663. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3644.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Radovich J., Talmage D. W. Antigenic competition: cellular or humoral. Science. 1967 Oct 27;158(3800):512–514. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3800.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Reel J. R., Kenney F. T. "Superinduction" of tyrosine transaminase in hepatoma cell cultures: differential inhibition of synthesis and turnover by actionomycin D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Sep;61(1):200–206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SCARANO E., DEPETROCELLIS B., AUGUSTI-TOCCO G. STUDIES ON THE CONTROL OF ENZYME SYNTHESIS DURING THE EARLY EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE URCHINS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 May 18;87:174–176. doi: 10.1016/0926-6550(64)90063-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. SPEIRS R. S. EFFECT OF ACTINOMYCIN D UPON THE IMMUNE RESPONSES TO TETANUS TOXOID. Life Sci. 1965 Feb;4:343–349. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90151-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STAVITSKY A. B. Micromethods for the study of proteins and antibodies. I. Procedure and general applications of hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition reactions with tannic acid and protein-treated red blood cells. J Immunol. 1954 May;72(5):360–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smiley J. D., Heard J. G., Ziff M. EFFECT OF ACTINOMYCIN D ON RNA SYNTHESIS AND ANTIBODY FORMATION IN THE ANAMNESTIC RESPONSE IN VITRO. J Exp Med. 1964 Jun 1;119(6):881–893. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.6.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stavitsky A. B., Gusdon J. P., Jr Symposium on in vitro studies of the immune response. IV. Role of nucleic acids in the anamnestic antibody response. Bacteriol Rev. 1966 Jun;30(2):418–426. doi: 10.1128/br.30.2.418-426.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. THOMPSON R., FISHEL C. W. INHIBITION OF ANTIBODY FORMATION BY HOMOLOGOUS TISSUE FACTORS. J Immunol. 1965 Mar;94:379–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tomkins G. M., Thompson E. B., Hayashi S., Gelehrter T., Granner D., Peterkofsky B. Tyrosine transaminase induction in mammalian cells in tissue culture. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1966;31:349–360. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wing D. R., Robinson D. S. Clearing-factor lipase in adipose tissue. Studies with puromycin and actinomycin. Biochem J. 1968 Feb;106(3):667–676. doi: 10.1042/bj1060667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES