Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1977 Apr 1;145(4):1029–1038. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.4.1029

The role of fetal calf serum in the primary immune response in vitro

PMCID: PMC2180644  PMID: 870605

Abstract

The mode of action of 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) on the primary immune response in vitro was investigated. Fetal calf serum (FCS) was preincubated with 2-ME and lyophilized to remove free 2-ME. This 2-ME- treated FCS was able to substitute the function of adherent cells in the primary immune response against sheep red blood cells (SRBC) in vitro; Fractionation of 2-tme-treated FCS on a Sephadex G-100 column showed that 2-ME acted on a high molecular serum component which after activation, could substitute for macrophages. In order to obtain a humoral immune response against SRBC in vitro, spleen cells require selected FCS. These "good" sera could be distinguished from "deficient" sera by their higher content of this 2-ME-activated factor. The height of the in vitro immune response to SRBC was dependent on the amount of activated factor added to the culture medium. FCS normally required in the culture medium could be completely replaced by the factor- containing fraction without deleterious effect on the culture medium. The factor should be added to the spleen cells during the first 24 h of culture and remain there for 72 h in order to obtain an optimal immune response. The factor could be partially absorbed by spleen cells but not by SRBC. The relationship between macrophage, 2-ME, and FCS in eliciting an in vitro primary immune response is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (627.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Broome J. D., Jeng M. W. Promotion of replication in lymphoid cells by specific thiols and disulfides in vitro. Effects on mouse lymphoma cells in comparison with splenic lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1973 Sep 1;138(3):574–592. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.3.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bullock W. W., Möller E. "Spontaneous" B cell activation due to loss of normal mouse serum suppressor. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Dec;2(6):514–517. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calderon J., Unanue E. R. Two biological activities regulating cell proliferation found in cultures of peritoneal exudate cells. Nature. 1975 Jan 31;253(5490):359–361. doi: 10.1038/253359a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calkins C. E., Golub E. S. Direct demonstration of lymphocyte--macrophage cooperation in the absence of physical contact between the two cell types. Cell Immunol. 1972 Dec;5(4):579–586. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90108-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen C., Hirsch J. G. The effects of mercaptoethanol and of peritoneal macrophages on the antibody-forming capacity of nonadherent mouse spleen cells in vitro. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):604–617. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Click R. E., Benck L., Alter B. J. Enhancement of antibody synthesis in vitro by mercaptoethanol. Cell Immunol. 1972 Jan;3(1):156–160. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90237-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Erb P., Feldmann M. The role of macrophages in the generation of T helper cells. III. Influence of macrophage-derived factors in helper cell induction. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Nov;5(11):759–766. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830051106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffmann M., Dutton R. W. Immune response restoration with macrophage culture supernatants. Science. 1971 Jun 4;172(3987):1047–1048. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3987.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz-Heber E., Peck A. B., Click R. E. Immune responses in vitro. II. Mixed leukocyte interaction in a protein-free medium. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Jul;3(7):379–385. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee K. C., Langman R. E., Paetkau V. H., Diener E. The cellular basis of cortisone-induced immunosuppression of the antibody response studied by its reversal in vitro. Cell Immunol. 1975 Jun;17(2):405–417. doi: 10.1016/s0008-8749(75)80044-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lemke H., Opitz H. G. Function of 2-mercaptoethanol as a macrophage substitute in the primary immune response in vitro. J Immunol. 1976 Aug;117(2):388–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lundgren G., Zukoski C. F., Möller G. Differential effects of human granulocytes and lymphocytes on human fibroblasts in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol. 1968 Oct;3(8):817–836. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ly I. A., Mishell R. I. Separation of mouse spleen cells by passage through columns of sephadex G-10. J Immunol Methods. 1974 Aug;5(3):239–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(74)90108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mosier D. E. A requirement for two cell types for antibody formation in vitro. Science. 1967 Dec 22;158(3808):1573–1575. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3808.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Möller G., Lemke H., Opitz H. G. The role of adherent cells in the immune response. Fibroblasts and products released by fibroblasts and peritoneal cells can substitute for adherent cells. Scand J Immunol. 1976;5(3):269–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1976.tb00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peck A. B., Katz-Heber E., Click R. E. Immune responses in vitro. IV. A comparison of the protein-free and mouse serum-supplemented mouse mixed lymphocyte interaction assays. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Aug;3(8):516–519. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shortman K., Palmer J. The requirement for macrophages in the in vitro immune response. Cell Immunol. 1971 Oct;2(5):399–410. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES