Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1977 May 1;145(5):1353–1367. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.5.1353

H-2 restriction of cell-mediated immunity to an intracellular bacterium: effector T cells are specific for Listeria antigen in association with H-21 region-coded self-markers

PMCID: PMC2180650  PMID: 67177

Abstract

The protective activity of anti-Listeria-immune T cells assayed in an adoptive transfer system in H-2 restricted. As shown in the present studies, the demonstration of the restriction is directly dependent on the dose and the relative protective activity of spleen cells. In addition, some H-2-unrestricted protection is conferred predominantly by other than immunoglobulin-negative spleen cells. Thus, the activity of Listeria-immune T cells appears to be 'absolutely' restricted and is in this respect comparable to in vivo T-cell-mediated anti-viral protection. The predominant genetic region of H-2 coding for the structures which are mainly involved in this restriction in T-cell immunity to this prototype intracellular bacterium is the I region. The specificity of Listeria-immune T cells is determined by the H-2 haplotype of the donor. Thus, F1 hybrids seem to possess at least two separable sets of T cells, each specific for one parental haplotype. As is true in the virus model, the results cannot distinguish between an altered-self or a dual recognition model of T-cell recognition to explain H-2 restriction. They are, however, compatible with the idea and I-coded cell surface structures may serve as receptors for cell- specific differentiation signals, which trigger direct or lymphokin- mediated activation of macrophages to manifest increased bactericidal capacity. The interesting parallels in self-marker recognition of T cells in the virus and intracellular bacterium systems, respectively, appear to be reasonably explained by the different types of signals transmitted by T cells to various target cells via the distinctly different self-markers employed (i.e., K or D vs I).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (981.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ada G. I., Jackson D. C., Blanden R. V., Hla R. T., Bowern N. A. Changes in the surface of virus-induced cells recognized by cytotoxic T cells. I. Minimal requirements for lysis of ectromelia-infected P-815 cells. Scand J Immunol. 1976;5(1-2):23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1976.tb02988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bevan M. J. Interaction antigens detected by cytotoxic T cells with the major histocompatibility complex as modifier. Nature. 1975 Jul 31;256(5516):419–421. doi: 10.1038/256419a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanden R. V., Doherty P. C., Dunlop M. B., Gardner I. D., Zinkernagel R. M., David C. S. Genes required for cytotoxicity against virus-infected target cells in K and D regions of H-2 complex. Nature. 1975 Mar 20;254(5497):269–270. doi: 10.1038/254269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanden R. V., Hapel A. J., Jackson D. C. Mode of action of Ir genes and the nature of T cell receptors for antigen. Immunochemistry. 1976 Feb;13(2):179–191. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(76)90287-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanden R. V., Langman R. E. Cell-mediated immunity to bacterial infection in the mouse. Thymus-derived cells as effectors of acquired resistance to Listeria monocytogenes. Scand J Immunol. 1972;1(4):379–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1972.tb03304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanden R. V. T cell response to viral and bacterial infection. Transplant Rev. 1974;19(0):56–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1974.tb00128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantor H., Boyse E. A. Functional subclasses of T-lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. I. The generation of functionally distinct T-cell subclasses is a differentiative process independent of antigen. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1376–1389. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cerottini J. C., Brunner K. T. Cell-mediated cytotoxicity, allograft rejection, and tumor immunity. Adv Immunol. 1974;18:67–132. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60308-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins F. M. Mechanisms in antimicrobial immunity. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1971 Jul;10(1):58–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doherty P. C., Blanden R. V., Zinkernagel R. M. Specificity of virus-immune effector T cells for H-2K or H-2D compatible interactions: implications for H-antigen diversity. Transplant Rev. 1976;29:89–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1976.tb00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frelinger J. A., Neiderhuber J. E., David C. S., Shreffler D. C. Evidence for the expression of Ia (H-2-associated) antigens on thymus-derived lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1974 Nov 1;140(5):1273–1284. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.5.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gordon R. D., Simpson E., Samelson L. E. In vitro cell-mediated immune responses to the male specific(H-Y) antigen in mice. J Exp Med. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1108–1120. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. JENKIN C. R., ROWLEY D. BASIS FOR IMMUNITY TO TYPHOID IN MICE AND THE QUESTION OF "CELLULAR IMMUNITY". Bacteriol Rev. 1963 Dec;27:391–404. doi: 10.1128/br.27.4.391-404.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katz D. H., Benacerraf B. The function and interrelationships of T-cell receptors, Ir genes and other histocompatibility gene products. Transplant Rev. 1975;22:175–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb01559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz D. H., Graves M., Dorf M. E., Dimuzio H., Benacerraf B. Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. VII. Cooperative responses between lymphocytes are controlled by genes in the I region of the H-2 complex. J Exp Med. 1975 Jan 1;141(1):263–268. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kees U., Blanden R. V. A single genetic element in H-2K affects mouse T-cell antiviral function in poxvirus infection. J Exp Med. 1976 Feb 1;143(2):450–455. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.2.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LAWRENCE H. S. Homograft sensitivity. An expression of the immunologic origins and consequences of individuality. Physiol Rev. 1959 Oct;39:811–859. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1959.39.4.811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lafferty K., Ryan M., Misko I. An improved system for the assay of stimulation in mouse mixed leucocyte cultures. J Immunol Methods. 1974 Mar;4(2):263–273. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(74)90069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane F. C., Unanue E. R. Requirement of thymus (T) lymphocytes for resistance to listeriosis. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1104–1112. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MACKANESS G. B. Cellular resistance to infection. J Exp Med. 1962 Sep 1;116:381–406. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MACKANESS G. B. THE IMMUNOLOGICAL BASIS OF ACQUIRED CELLULAR RESISTANCE. J Exp Med. 1964 Jul 1;120:105–120. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MITCHISON N. A. Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 Feb 18;142(906):72–87. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mackaness G. B. The influence of immunologically committed lymphoid cells on macrophage activity in vivo. J Exp Med. 1969 May 1;129(5):973–992. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.5.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller J. F., Vadas M. A., Whitelaw A., Gamble J. H-2 gene complex restricts transfer of delayed-type hypersensitivity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):5095–5098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.5095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. North R. J. Importance of thymus-derived lymphocytes in cell-mediated immunity to infection. Cell Immunol. 1973 Apr;7(1):166–176. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(73)90193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. ROWLEY D., TURNER K. J., JENKIN C. R. THE BASIS FOR IMMUNITY TO MOUSE TYPHOID. 3. CELL-BOUND ANTIBODY. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Apr;42:237–248. doi: 10.1038/icb.1964.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shearer G. M., Rehn T. G., Schmitt-Verhulst A. M. Role of the murine major histocompatibility complex in the specificity of in vitro T-cell-mediated lympholysis against chemically-modified autologous lymphocytes. Transplant Rev. 1976;29:222–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1976.tb00203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shreffler D. C., David C. S. The H-2 major histocompatibility complex and the I immune response region: genetic variation, function, and organization. Adv Immunol. 1975;20:125–195. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60208-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zinkernagel R. M., Althage A. Antiviral protection by virus-immune cytotoxic T cells: infected target cells are lysed before infectious virus progeny is assembled. J Exp Med. 1977 Mar 1;145(3):644–651. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.3.644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zinkernagel R. M., Blanden R. V., Langman R. E. Early appearance of sensitized lymphocytes in mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol. 1974 Feb;112(2):496–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. H-2 compatability requirement for T-cell-mediated lysis of target cells infected with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Different cytotoxic T-cell specificities are associated with structures coded for in H-2K or H-2D;. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1427–1436. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. Immunological surveillance against altered self components by sensitised T lymphocytes in lymphocytic choriomeningitis. Nature. 1974 Oct 11;251(5475):547–548. doi: 10.1038/251547a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zinkernagel R. M. H-2 compatibility requirement for virus-specific T-cell-mediated cytolysis. The H-2K structure involved is coded by a single cistron defined by H-2Kb mutant mice. J Exp Med. 1976 Feb 1;143(2):437–443. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zinkernagel R. M. H-2 restriction of virus-specific T-cell-mediated effector functions in vivo. II. Adoptive transfer of delayed-type hypersensitivity to murine lymphocytic choriomeningits virus is restriced by the K and D region of H-2. J Exp Med. 1976 Sep 1;144(3):776–787. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.3.776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zinkernagel R. M. H-2 restriction of virus-specific cytotoxicity across the H-2 barrier. Separate effector T-cell specificities are associated with self-H-2 and with the tolerated allogeneic H-2 in chimeras. J Exp Med. 1976 Oct 1;144(4):933–945. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.4.933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zinkernagel R. M. Restriction by H-2 gene complex of transfer of cell-mediated immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Nature. 1974 Sep 20;251(5472):230–233. doi: 10.1038/251230a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zinkernagel R. M., Welsh R. M. H-2 compatibility requirement for virus-specific T cell-mediated effector functions in vivo. I. Specificity of T cells conferring antiviral protection against lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus is associated with H-2K and H-2D. J Immunol. 1976 Nov;117(5 Pt 1):1495–1502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES