Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1977 Aug 1;146(2):535–546. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.2.535

Pathogenesis of shigella diarrhea. VII. Evidence for a cell membrane toxin receptor involving β1 {arrow} 4-linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine oligomers

GT Keusch, M Jacewicz
PMCID: PMC2180767  PMID: 327017

Abstract

The binding of ShigeUa dysenteriae 1 cytotoxin to HeLa cells in culture and to isolated rat liver cell membranes was studied by means of an indirect consumption assay of toxicity from the medium, or by determination of cytotoxicity to the HeLa cell monolayer. Both liver cell membranes and HeLa cells removed toxicity from the medium during incubation, in contrast to WI-38 and Y-1 mouse adrenal tumor cells, both of which neither bound nor were affected by the toxin. Uptake of toxin was directly related to concentration of membranes added, time,and temperature, and indirectly related to the ionic strength of the buffer used. The chemical nature of the membrane receptor was characterized by using three principal approaches: (a) enzymatic sensitivity; (b) competitive inhibition and (c) receptor blockade studies. The receptor was destroyed by proteolytic enzymes, phospholipases (which markedly altered the gross appearance of the membrane preparation) and by lysozyme, but not by a variety of other enzymes. Of 28 carbohydrate and glycoprotein haptens studied, including cholera toxin and ganglioside, only the chitin oligosaccharide lysozyme substrates, per N-acetylated chitotriose, chitotetraose, and chitopentaose were effective competitive inhibitors. Greatest inhibition was found with the trimer, N, N’, N” triacetyl chitotriose. Of three lectins studied as possible receptor blockers, including phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A, and wheat germ agglutinin, only the latter, which is known to possess specific binding affinity for N, N’, N” triacetyl chitotriose, was able to block toxin uptake. Evidence from all three approaches indicate, therefore, existence of a glycoprotein toxin receptor on mammalian cells, with involvement of oligomeric β1{arrow}4-1inked N-acetyl glucosamine in the receptor. This receptor is clearly distinct from the G(M1) ganglioside thought to be involved in the binding of cholera toxin to the cell membrane of a variety of cell types susceptible to its action.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (883.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett V., O'Keefe E., Cuatrecasaş P. Mechanism of action of cholera toxin and the mobile receptor theory of hormone receptor-adenylate cyclase interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):33–37. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borberg H., Yesner I., Gesner B., Silber R. The effect of N acetyl C-galactosamine and other sugars on the mitogenic activity and attachment of PHA to tonsil cells. Blood. 1968 Jun;31(6):747–757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charney A. N., Gots R. E., Formal S. B., Giannella R. A. Activation of intestinal mucosal adenylate cyclase by Shigella dysenteriae I enterotoxin. Gastroenterology. 1976 Jun;70(6):1085–1090. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuatrecasas P. Gangliosides and membrane receptors for cholera toxin. Biochemistry. 1973 Aug 28;12(18):3558–3566. doi: 10.1021/bi00742a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuatrecasas P. Interaction of Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin with cell membranes. Biochemistry. 1973 Aug 28;12(18):3547–3558. doi: 10.1021/bi00742a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Donowitz M., Binder H. J. Effect of enterotoxins of Vibrio cholerae, Escherichia coli, and Shigella dysenteriae type 1 on fluid and electrolyte transport in the colon. J Infect Dis. 1976 Aug;134(2):135–143. doi: 10.1093/infdis/134.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein I. J., Reichert C. M., Misaki A. Interaction of concanavalin A with model substrates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974;234(0):283–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb53040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heyningen S Van Cholera toxin: interaction of subunits with ganglioside GM1. Science. 1974 Feb 15;183(4125):656–657. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4125.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Holmgren J., Lönnroth I., Månsson J., Svennerholm L. Interaction of cholera toxin and membrane GM1 ganglioside of small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2520–2524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keusch G. T., Grady G. F., Mata L. J., McIver J. The pathogenesis of Shigella diarrhea. I. Enterotoxin production by Shigella dysenteriae I. J Clin Invest. 1972 May;51(5):1212–1218. doi: 10.1172/JCI106915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keusch G. T., Grady G. F., Takeuchi A., Sprinz H. The pathogenesis of shigella diarrhea. II. Enterotoxin-induced acute enteritis in the rabbit ileum. J Infect Dis. 1972 Jul;126(1):92–95. doi: 10.1093/infdis/126.1.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keusch G. T., Jacewicz M., Hirschman S. Z. Quantitative microassay in cell culture for enterotoxin of Shigella dysenteriae. J Infect Dis. 1972 May;125(5):539–541. doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.5.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keusch G. T., Jacewicz M., Levine M. M., Hornick R. B., Kochwa S. Pathogenesis of shigella diarrhea. Serum anticytotoxin antibody response produced by toxigenic and nontoxigenic Shigella dysenteriae 1. J Clin Invest. 1976 Jan;57(1):194–202. doi: 10.1172/JCI108259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. King C. A., Van Heyningen W. E. Deactivation of cholera toxin by a sialidase-resistant monosialosylganglioside. J Infect Dis. 1973 Jun;127(6):639–647. doi: 10.1093/infdis/127.6.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Labrec E. H., Schneider H., Magnani T. J., Formal S. B. EPITHELIAL CELL PENETRATION AS AN ESSENTIAL STEP IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF BACILLARY DYSENTERY. J Bacteriol. 1964 Nov;88(5):1503–1518. doi: 10.1128/jb.88.5.1503-1518.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levine M. M., DuPont H. L., Formal S. B., Hornick R. B., Takeuchi A., Gangarosa E. J., Snyder M. J., Libonati J. P. Pathogenesis of Shigella dysenteriae 1 (Shiga) dysentery. J Infect Dis. 1973 Mar;127(3):261–270. doi: 10.1093/infdis/127.3.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McIver J., Grady G. F., Keusch G. T. Production and characterization of exotoxin(s) of Shigella dysenteriae type 1. J Infect Dis. 1975 May;131(5):559–566. doi: 10.1093/infdis/131.5.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neville D. M., Jr Isolation of an organ specific protein antigen from cell-surface membrane of rat liver. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Apr 9;154(3):540–552. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(68)90014-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RUPLEY J. A. THE HYDROLYSIS OF CHITIN BY CONCENTRATED HYDROCHLORIC ACID, AND THE PREPARATION OF LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT SUBSTRATES FOR LYSOZYME. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Nov 1;83:245–255. doi: 10.1016/0926-6526(64)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rout W. R., Formal S. B., Giannella R. A., Dammin G. J. Pathophysiology of Shigella diarrhea in the rhesus monkey: intestinal transport, morphological, and bacteriological studies. Gastroenterology. 1975 Feb;68(2):270–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharp G. W. Action of cholera toxin on fluid and electrolyte movement in the small intestine. Annu Rev Med. 1973;24:19–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.24.020173.000315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Steinberg S. E., Banwell J. G., Yardley J. H., Keusch G. T., Hendrix T. R. Comparison of secretory and histological effects of shigella and cholera enterotoxins in rabbit jejunum. Gastroenterology. 1975 Feb;68(2):309–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES