Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1978 Apr 1;147(4):1213–1227. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.4.1213

Effect of colchicine on the antibody response. I. Enhancement of antibody formation in mice

PMCID: PMC2184259  PMID: 77305

Abstract

Colchicine (CC) enhances the antibody response in mice to protein antigens, like diphtheria toxoid and human gamma globulin, as well as to the 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl hapten. Maximal enhancement was observed when CC was administered to animals on the same day as the injection of antigen. The optimal dose of CC was in the range of 1.0-1.5 mg/kg body weight. The enhanced antibody formation was evident from elevated circulating antibody titers and from an increased number of antibody plaque-forming cells (PFC) of the spleen. The circulating antibody titer of CC-treated animals was higher than that of control animals by a factor of about 3-7 in the primary response, and by a factor of at least 15 in the secondary response. In terms of the number of antibody forming cells, CC enhanced the primary PFC response by approximately equal to 100%, and the secondary PFC response by as high as fivefold. The enhancing effect of CC seemed to be related to its mitosis-blocking capacity since (a) vinblastine another antimitotic drug, was found to be as effective as CC and (b) lumicolchicine, the non-anti-mitotic structural isomer of CC, was ineffective in potentiating antibody responses. The critical timing in the administration of CC on the same day as antigen suggests that most likely, the mitotic poison was acting on antigen-stimulated early dividing suppressor cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (834.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson R. E., Warner N. L. Ionizing radiation and the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1976;24:215–335. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60331-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BANEY R. N., VAZQUEZ J. J., DIXON F. J. Cellular proliferation in relation to antibody synthesis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962 Jan;109:1–4. doi: 10.3181/00379727-109-27083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bash J. A., Singer A. M., Waksman B. H. The suppressive effect of immunization on the proliferative responses of rat T cells in vitro. II. Abrogation of antigen-induced suppression by selective cytotoxic agents. J Immunol. 1976 May;116(5):1350–1353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiller J. M., Habicht G. S., Weigle W. O. Kinetic differences in unresponsiveness of thymus and bone marrow cells. Science. 1971 Feb 26;171(3973):813–815. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3973.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DIXON F. J., McCONAHEY P. J. Enhancement of antibody formation by whole body x-radiation. J Exp Med. 1963 May 1;117:833–848. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.5.833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eardley D. D., Sercarz E. E. Modulation of help and suppression in a hapten-carrier system. J Immunol. 1976 Mar;116(3):600–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eardley D. D., Sercarz E. E. Recall of specific suppression: co-dominance of suppression after primary or secondary antigen stimulation. J Immunol. 1977 Apr;118(4):1306–1310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gallily R., Garvey J. S. Primary stimulation of rats and mice with hemocyanin in soluton and adsorbed on bentonite. J Immunol. 1968 Nov;101(5):924–929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gershon R. K. T cell control of antibody production. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1974;3:1–40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3045-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HIRATA A. A., REDLICH M. Effect of colchicine on antibody response in hamsters. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962 Mar;109:628–630. doi: 10.3181/00379727-109-27290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JOHNSON A. G., GAINES S., LANDY M. Studies on the O antigen of Salmonella typhosa. V. Enhancement of antibody response to protein antigens by the purified lipopolysaccharide. J Exp Med. 1956 Feb 1;103(2):225–246. doi: 10.1084/jem.103.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kapp J. A., Ingraham J. S. Anti-protein plaque-forming cells detected with high efficiency by the use of red cells coupled to bovine serum globulin through bis-diazo-benzidine. J Immunol. 1970 Apr;104(4):1039–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LEDUC E. H., COONS A. H., CONNOLLY J. M. Studies on antibody production. II. The primary and secondary responses in the popliteal lymph node of the rabbit. J Exp Med. 1955 Jul 1;102(1):61–72. doi: 10.1084/jem.102.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Merritt K. Adjuvant action of bacterial endotoxin and colchicine on antibody formation in the hamster. Infect Immun. 1971 Oct;4(4):393–396. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.4.393-396.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rittenberg M. B., Amkraut A. A. Immunogenicity of trinitrophenyl-hemocyanin: production of primary and secondary anti-hapten precipitins. J Immunol. 1966 Sep;97(3):421–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rittenberg M. B., Pratt K. L. Antitrinitrophenyl (TNP) plaque assay. Primary response of Balb/c mice to soluble and particulate immunogen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1969 Nov;132(2):575–581. doi: 10.3181/00379727-132-34264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rowley D. A., Fitch F. W., Mosier D. E., Solliday S., Coppleson L. W., Brown B. W. The rate of division of antibody-forming cells during the early primary immune response. J Exp Med. 1968 May 1;127(5):983–1002. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.5.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. STAVITSKY A. B., ARQUILLA E. R. Micromethods for the study of proteins and antibodies. III. Procedures and applications of hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition reactions with bis-diazotized benzidine and protein-conjugated red blood cells. J Immunol. 1955 Apr;74(4):306–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. TALIAFERRO W. H., TALIAFERRO L. G., JANSSEN E. F. The localization of x-ray injury to the initial phases of antibody response. J Infect Dis. 1952 Sep-Oct;91(2):105–124. doi: 10.1093/infdis/91.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taliaferro W. H., Taliaferro L. G. Effects of radiation on the initial and anamnestic IgM hemolysin responses in rabbits; antigen injection after X-rays. J Immunol. 1969 Sep;103(3):559–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WHITE R. G. FACTORS AFFECTING THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE. Br Med Bull. 1963 Sep;19:207–213. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson L., Friedkin M. The biochemical events of mitosis. I. Synthesis and properties of colchicine labeled with tritium in its acetyl moiety. Biochemistry. 1966 Jul;5(7):2463–2468. doi: 10.1021/bi00871a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES