Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1978 May 1;147(5):1449–1468. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.5.1449

Kidney transplants in mice. An analysis of the immune status of mice bearing long-term, H-2 incompatible transplants

PS Russell, CM Chase, RB Colvin, JMD Plate
PMCID: PMC2184269  PMID: 148488

Abstract

Kidney transplants between strains of mice which are incompatible at either the K or the D end of the H-2 complex usually function for prolonged periods supporting the lives of nephrectomized recipients. This occurs with no recipient treatment. With multiple H-2 and non-H-2 determined incompatibilities, transplants may be rejected but more slowly than skin grafts. In the strain combination studied most extensively in these experiments (B10.D2 to B6AF(1)) in which the incompatibility was confined to the K end of the H-2 region, about 70 percent of recipients survived for many weeks with normal blood urea nitrogen levels. Skin grafts between untreated members of these strains were rejected promptly (mean survival time of 13.5 +/- 1.1 days) as were kidney transplants to recipients of prior skin grafts. Donor strain skin grafts to recipients of kidney transplants after kidney transplantation enjoyed greatly prolonged survival whereas skin grafts from a third party (A.SW) were rejected normally. If kidney tissue was transferred in the form of free grafts without primary vascular union, it was rejected promptly leaving its recipient highly immunized. Cellular and humoral immunity to donor antigens declined over the first few weeks after transplantation, and the spleens of long-term recipients contained no “killer cells.” Recipient lymphoid cells could mount active graft versus host reactions to donor strain antigens on transfer to neonatal mice. Nevertheless, they were distinctly less able to respond specifically by the production of killer cells to donor strain antigens after sensitization in vitro. No evidence that this defect was associated with the presence of suppressor cells was forthcoming from several types of in vivo and in vitro tests.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berke G., Amos D. B. Cytotoxic lymphocytes in the absence of detectable antibody. Nat New Biol. 1973 Apr 25;242(121):237–239. doi: 10.1038/newbio242237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calne R. Y., Sells R. A., Pena J. R., Davis D. R., Millard P. R., Herbertson B. M., Binns R. M., Davies D. A. Induction of immunological tolerance by porcine liver allografts. Nature. 1969 Aug 2;223(5205):472–476. doi: 10.1038/223472a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corry R. J., Winn H. J., Russell P. S. Heart transplantation in congenic strains of mice. Transplant Proc. 1973 Mar;5(1):733–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corry R. J., Winn H. J., Russell P. S. Primarily vascularized allografts of hearts in mice. The role of H-2D, H-2K, and non-H-2 antigens in rejection. Transplantation. 1973 Oct;16(4):343–350. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197310000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fabre J. W., Batchelor J. R. The role of the spleen in the rejection and enhancement of renal allografts in the rat. Transplantation. 1975 Sep;20(3):219–226. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197509000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferrer J. F. Role of the spleen in passive immunological enhancement. Transplantation. 1968 Mar;6(2):167–172. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196803000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. French M. E., Batchelor J. R. Enhancement of renal allografts in rats and man. Transplant Rev. 1972;13:115–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gershon R. K., Carter R. L. Factors controlling concomitant immunity in tumor-bearing hamsters: effects of prior splenectomy and tumor removal. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Sep;43(3):533–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jeekel J. J., McKenzie I. F., Winn H. J. Immunological enhancement of skin grafts in the mouse. J Immunol. 1972 Apr;108(4):1017–1024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kilshaw P. J., Brent L., Pinto M. Suppressor T cells in mice made unresponsive to skin allografts. Nature. 1975 Jun 5;255(5508):489–491. doi: 10.1038/255489a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LITCHFIELD J. T., Jr A method for rapid graphic solution of time-per cent effect curves. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1949 Dec;97(4):399-408, 3 tab. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Plate J. M. Synergistic interactions between lymph node and thymus cells in response to antigenic differences limited to selected regions of the H-2 complex. Cell Immunol. 1976 Jan;21(1):121–132. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90333-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Russell P. S., Chase C. M., Colvin R. B., Plate J. M. Induced immune destruction of long-surviving, H-2 incompatible kidney transplants in mice. J Exp Med. 1978 May 1;147(5):1469–1486. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.5.1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sachs D. H., Winn H. J., Russell P. S. The immunologic response to xenografts. Recognition of mouse H-2 histocompatibility antigens by the rat. J Immunol. 1971 Aug;107(2):481–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Silver D. M., McKenzie I. F., Winn H. J. Variations in the responses of C57BL-10J and A-J mice to sheep red blood cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Nov 1;136(5):1063–1071. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Skoskiewicz M., Chase C., Winn H. J., Russell P. S. Kidney transplants between mice of graded immunogenetic diversity. Transplant Proc. 1973 Mar;5(1):721–725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stuart F. P., Saitoh T., Fitch F. W. Rejection of renal allografts: specific immunologic suppression. Science. 1968 Jun 28;160(3835):1463–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3835.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WINN H. J. Immune mechanisms in homotransplantation. II. Quantitative assay of the immunologic activity of lymphoid cells stimulated by tumor homografts. J Immunol. 1961 Feb;86:228–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White E., Hildemann W. H. Allografts in genetically defined rats: difference in survival between kidney and skin. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1293–1295. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES