Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1978 Jun 1;147(6):1661–1670. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.6.1661

Cytotoxic T-cell responses show more restricted specificity for self than for non-self H-2D-coded antigens

RV Blanden, U Kees
PMCID: PMC2184312  PMID: 79634

Abstract

The specificity of recognition of H-2 antigens by various subsets of Tc cells was investigated with respect to the two separate molecules known to be coded in the H-2D(d) region (a) D which carries the private specificity H-2.4 and (b) D’which carries the public specificity H-2.28. BALB/c.H-2(db) mutant mice express D but not D’ on their cell surfaces, whereas wild-type BALB/c mice express both D and D’. H-2 restricted Tc cells specific for viral-plus- H-2D(d)-coded antigens on infected self cells, or minor H-plus-H-2D(d)-coded antigens on H-2-compatible cells apparently recognize D, but do not detectably recognize D. In contrast, BALB/c-H-2(db) anti-BALB/c Tc cell responses do recognize D’ (the only known antigen which is not shared by mutant and wild-type); furthermore, D’ is also detectably recognized by a significant proportion of the Tc cells that respond in MLR to H-2D(d)-coded antigens. In these latter responses, D’ was recognized separately from D, i.e., the response was not “H-2 restricted”. These results indicate that H-2 restricted Tc cell responses to modified-self cells are more specific for self H-2D(d)-coded antigens then are allogeneic Tc cell responses directed at the same antigens, in that haplotype-unique (private) specificity recognition (of the D molecule) exclusively occurs only in the former, not the latter case. The implications of this specificity of H-2 restricted responses for possible processes of somatic selection of anti-self recognition structures on progenitor Tc cells are briefly discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (671.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bevan M. J. In a radiation chimaera, host H-2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells. Nature. 1977 Sep 29;269(5627):417–418. doi: 10.1038/269417a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bevan M. J. Interaction antigens detected by cytotoxic T cells with the major histocompatibility complex as modifier. Nature. 1975 Jul 31;256(5516):419–421. doi: 10.1038/256419a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanden R. V., Doherty P. C., Dunlop M. B., Gardner I. D., Zinkernagel R. M., David C. S. Genes required for cytotoxicity against virus-infected target cells in K and D regions of H-2 complex. Nature. 1975 Mar 20;254(5497):269–270. doi: 10.1038/254269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanden R. V., Gardner I. D. The cell-mediated immune response to ectromelia virus infection. I. Kinetics and characteristics of the primary effector T cell response in vivo. Cell Immunol. 1976 Mar 15;22(2):271–282. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90029-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanden R. V., McKenzie I. F., Kees U., Melvold R. W., Kohn H. I. Cytotoxic T-cell response to Ectromelia virus-infected cells. Different H-2 requirements for triggering precursor T-cell induction or lysis by effector T cells defined by the BALB/c-H-2db mutation. J Exp Med. 1977 Sep 1;146(3):869–880. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.3.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanden R. V., Pang T. Cytotoxic T cell recognition of ectromelia virus-infected cells. Are receptors for viral and H-2 determinants closely associated? Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1978 Feb;56(1):69–80. doi: 10.1038/icb.1978.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Braciale T. J. Immunologic recognition of influenza virus-infected cells. II. Expression of influenza A matrix protein on the infected cell surface and its role in recognition by cross-reactive cytotoxic T cells. J Exp Med. 1977 Sep 1;146(3):673–689. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.3.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown J. L., Nathenson S. G. Structural differences between parent and mutant H-2K glycoproteins from two H-2K gene mutants: b6.c-h-2ba (Hzl) and B6-H-2bd (M505). J Immunol. 1977 Jan;118(1):98–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doherty P. C., Blanden R. V., Zinkernagel R. M. Specificity of virus-immune effector T cells for H-2K or H-2D compatible interactions: implications for H-antigen diversity. Transplant Rev. 1976;29:89–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1976.tb00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardner I. D., Blanden R. V. The cell-mediated immune response to ectromelia virus infection. II. Secondary response in vitro and kinetics of memory T cell production in vivo. Cell Immunol. 1976 Mar 15;22(2):283–296. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90030-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner I. D., Bowern N. A., Blanden R. V. Cell-medicated cytotoxicity against ectromelia virus-infected target cells. III. Role of the H-2 gene complex. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Feb;5(2):122–127. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hansen T. H., Cullen S. E., Melvold R., Kohn H., Flaherty L., Sachs D. H. Mutation in a new H-2-associated histocompatibility gene closely linked to H-2D. J Exp Med. 1977 Jun 1;145(6):1550–1558. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.6.1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Janeway C. A., Wigzell H., Binz H. Two different VH gene products make up the T-cell receptors. Scand J Immunol. 1976;5(9):993–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1976.tb03051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jerne N. K. The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kees U., Blanden R. V. A single genetic element in H-2K affects mouse T-cell antiviral function in poxvirus infection. J Exp Med. 1976 Feb 1;143(2):450–455. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.2.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klein J., Chiang C. L., Hauptfeld V. Histocompatibility antigens controlled by the I region of the murine H-2 complex. II. K/D region compatibility is not required for I-region cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity. J Exp Med. 1977 Feb 1;145(2):450–454. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.2.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klein J., Hauptfeld M., Hauptfeld V. Serological distinction of mutants B6.CH(zl) and B6.M505 from strain C57BL-6. J Exp Med. 1974 Oct 1;140(4):1127–1132. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.4.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koszinowski U., Gething M. J., Waterfield M. T-cell cytotoxicity in the absence of viral protein synthesis in target cells. Nature. 1977 May 12;267(5607):160–163. doi: 10.1038/267160a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindahl F., Peck A. B., Bach F. H. Specificity of cell-mediated lympholysis for public and private H-2 determinants. Scand J Immunol. 1975 Sep;4(5-6):541–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1975.tb02660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nabholz M., Young H., Rynbeek A., Boccardo R., David C. S., Meo T., Miggiano V., Shreffler D. C. I-region-associated determinants: expression on mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes and detection by cytotoxic T cells. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Sep;5(9):594–599. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pang T., Andrew M. E., Melvold R. W., Blanden R. V. Specificity or affinity of cytotoxic T cells for self H-2K determinants apparently does not change between primary and secondary responses to ectromelia virus infection. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1977 Feb;55(1):39–48. doi: 10.1038/icb.1977.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pang T., Blanden R. V. The cell-mediated immune response to ectromelia virus infection. Secondary response in vitro: specificity, nature of effector and responder cells and requirements for induction of antigenic changes in stimulator cells. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1976 Jun;54(3):253–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schrader J. W., Edelman G. M. Joint recognition by cytotoxic T cells of inactivated Sendai virus and products of the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med. 1977 Mar 1;145(3):523–539. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.3.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shearer G. M. Cell-mediated cytotoxicity to trinitrophenyl-modified syngeneic lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Aug;4(8):527–533. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wagner H., Götze D., Ptschelinzew L., Röllinghoff M. Induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against I-region-coded determinants: in vitro evidence for a third histocompatibility locus in the mouse. J Exp Med. 1975 Dec 1;142(6):1477–1487. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.6.1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zinkernagel R. M., Callahan G. N., Althage A., Cooper S., Klein P. A., Klein J. On the thymus in the differentiation of "H-2 self-recognition" by T cells: evidence for dual recognition? J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):882–896. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. Restriction of in vitro T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in lymphocytic choriomeningitis within a syngeneic or semiallogeneic system. Nature. 1974 Apr 19;248(5450):701–702. doi: 10.1038/248701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zinkernagel R. M. H-2 compatibility requirement for virus-specific T-cell-mediated cytolysis. The H-2K structure involved is coded by a single cistron defined by H-2Kb mutant mice. J Exp Med. 1976 Feb 1;143(2):437–443. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES