Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1979 Feb 1;149(2):535–538. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.2.535

Primary anti-viral cytotoxic T-cell responses in semiallogeneic chimeras are not absolutely restricted to host H-2 type

PMCID: PMC2184800  PMID: 216768

Abstract

Chimeras produced by reconstitution of 950 rads irradiated type A or type B host mice with (AXB)F1 fetal liver stem cells were examined in primary (in vivo) and secondary (in vitro) Tc-cell responses to ectromelia virus infection. Of 33 individual chimeras which gave primary responses, 26 produced significant specific lysis of infected targets of both A and B type, though host type targets were invariably lysed more efficiently (host bias). The other 7 chimeras gave lysis of infected host type targets only (absolute restriction). 12 individual chimeras were used in secondary responses. Nine showed host bias, and three showed absolute restriction. Whether an individual chimera showed host bias or absolute restriction seemed to be unrelated to whether the response was primary or secondary, to the time after reconstitution (ranging from 4 to 22 wk), to strain of mouse, or to the batch of fetal liver stem cells used.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (233.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bevan M. J. In a radiation chimaera, host H-2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells. Nature. 1977 Sep 29;269(5627):417–418. doi: 10.1038/269417a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanden R. V., Ada G. L. A dual recognition model for cytotoxic T cells based on thymic selection of precursors with low affinity for Self H-2 antigens. Scand J Immunol. 1978 Mar;7(3):181–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1978.tb00442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanden R. V., Kees U., Dunlop M. B. In vitro primary induction of cytotoxic T cells against virus-infected syngeneic cells. J Immunol Methods. 1977;16(1):73–89. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(77)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner I. D., Blanden R. V. The cell-mediated immune response to ectromelia virus infection. II. Secondary response in vitro and kinetics of memory T cell production in vivo. Cell Immunol. 1976 Mar 15;22(2):283–296. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90030-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner I. D., Bowern N. A., Blanden R. V. Cell-medicated cytotoxicity against ectromelia virus-infected target cells. III. Role of the H-2 gene complex. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Feb;5(2):122–127. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Janeway C. A., Wigzell H., Binz H. Two different VH gene products make up the T-cell receptors. Scand J Immunol. 1976;5(9):993–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1976.tb03051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miller J. F., Osoba D. Current concepts of the immunological function of the thymus. Physiol Rev. 1967 Jul;47(3):437–520. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1967.47.3.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zinkernagel R. M., Callahan G. N., Althage A., Cooper S., Klein P. A., Klein J. On the thymus in the differentiation of "H-2 self-recognition" by T cells: evidence for dual recognition? J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):882–896. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. von Boehmer H., Haas W., Jerne N. K. Major histocompatibility complex-linked immune-responsiveness is acquired by lymphocytes of low-responder mice differentiating in thymus of high-responder mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 May;75(5):2439–2442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.5.2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES