Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1979 Mar 1;149(3):758–773. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.3.758

The induction of cell-mediated immunity and tolerance with protein antigens coupled to syngeneic lymphoid cells

PMCID: PMC2184831  PMID: 85683

Abstract

A mouse model of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and tolerance to protein antigens horse gamma globulin (HoGG) and cytochrome (Cyt C) was investigated. A reliable CMI response as measured in vivo by ear swelling or by an in vitro T-cell proliferation assay could be induced by one of two methods: (a) sensitization by antigen-complete Freund's adjuvant in the base of the tail, or (b) sensitization by s.c. injection of antigen coupled to syngeneic lymphoid cells. The in vivo response exhibited characteristic CMI parameters, delayed kinetics, and transfer by viable T cells. Prior i.v. injection of HoGG-modified lymphoid cells (HoGG-LC) or Cyt C-LC before sensitization resulted in a rapidly induced, dose-dependent, antigen-specific suppression of both in vivo and in vitro manifestations of the CMI response. In addition, tolerance in this system was transferrable by an antigen-specific suppressor T cell (Ts). The Ts were found to diminish the in vivo ear swelling reaction in recipient animals, but had no effect on the in vitro T-cell proliferative response of the recipients. In contrast to the rapid development of tolerance in donor mice (phenotypic tolerance), transferrable Ts were first demonstrable 4--7 d posttolerization. This latter result indicates that at least two mechanisms of tolerance are operative in this system: the rapid induction of clone inhibition of reactive T cells and the slower induction of Ts. These results indicate again that the mode of antigen presentation is crucial in determining the immunologic outcome. In these experiments, cell-bound proteins injected subcutaneously led to delayed hypersensitivity while the same antigens injected intravenously led to tolerance. These results are considered in the light of recent experiments which show that T cells recognize antigens on cells in association with major histocompatibility complex products. We believe the following pathways are involved. In sensitization via subcutaneous injection of HoGG-LC, antigen reaches the lymph node via lymphatic pathways which lead to immunogenic macrophage-associated presentation and the activation of delayed hypersensitivity T cells (TDH). In tolerization via intravenous injection of HoGG-LC, antigen (a) reaches the lymph node via the blood, probably directly meeting the TDH, preventing its subsequent activation by immunogenic HoGG (clone inhibition) and (b) reaches the spleen, also via the blood, activating suppressor T cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,016.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bach B. A., Sherman L., Benacerraf B., Greene M. I. Mechanisms of regulation of cell-mediated immunity. II. Induction and suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity to azobenzenearsonate-coupled syngeneic cells. J Immunol. 1978 Oct;121(4):1460–1468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basten A., Miller J. F., Johnson P. T cell-dependent suppression of an anti-hapten antibody response. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:130–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battisto J. R., Bloom B. R. Dual immunological unresponsiveness induced by cell membrane coupled hapten or antigen. Nature. 1966 Oct 8;212(5058):156–157. doi: 10.1038/212156a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumgarten A., Geczy A. F. Induction of delayed hypersensitivity by dinitrophenylated lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970 Aug;19(2):205–217. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benacerraf B., Katz D. H. Failure to induce tolerance to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene contact sensitivity with a 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) conjugate of a copolymer of D-glutamic acid and D-lysine, a specific tolerogen for DNP B cells. J Immunol. 1974 Mar;112(3):1158–1163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin D. C. Suppressor cells in tolerance to HGG: kinetics and cross-suppression in high dose tolerance--absence in low dose tolerance. J Immunol. 1977 Jun;118(6):2125–2129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borek F., Battisto J. R. Specific immunologic unresponsiveness induced in adult guinea pigs with the aid of p-azobenzenearsonate hapten coupled to autologous red cells. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):877–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiller J. M., Weigle W. O. Cellular events during induction of immunologic unresponsiveness in adult mice. J Immunol. 1971 Jun;106(6):1647–1653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Claman H. N., Miller S. D. Requirements for induction of T cell tolerance to DNFB: efficiency of membrane-associated DNFB. J Immunol. 1976 Aug;117(2):480–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Claman H. N., Moorhead J. W. Tolerance to contact hypersensitivity. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1976;5:211–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Claman H. N. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. V. Induction of tolerance with DNP compounds and with free and membrane-associated DNFB. J Immunol. 1976 Mar;116(3):704–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Click R. E., Benck L., Alter B. J. Immune responses in vitro. I. Culture conditions for antibody synthesis. Cell Immunol. 1972 Feb;3(2):264–276. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Corradin G., Etlinger H. M., Chiller J. M. Lymphocyte specificity to protein antigens. I. Characterization of the antigen-induced in vitro T cell-dependent proliferative response with lymph node cells from primed mice. J Immunol. 1977 Sep;119(3):1048–1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cowing C., Harris D., Garabedian C., Lukic M., Leskowitz S. Immunologic tolerance to heterologous immunoglobulin: its relation to in vitro filtration by macrophages. J Immunol. 1977 Jul;119(1):256–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doyle M. V., Parks D. E., Weigle W. O. Specific suppression of the immune response by HGG tolerant spleen cells. I. Parameters affecting the level of suppression. J Immunol. 1976 Jun;116(6):1640–1645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. FREI P. C., BENACERRAF B., THORBECKE G. J. PHAGOCYTOSIS OF THE ANTIGEN, A CRUCIAL STEP IN THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY RESPONSE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Jan;53:20–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feldmann M., Kontiainen S. Suppressor cell induction in vitro. II. Cellular requirements of suppressor cell induction. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Apr;6(4):302–305. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Golan D. T., Borel Y. Nonantigenicity and immunologic tolerance: the role of the carrier in the induction of tolerance to the hapten. J Exp Med. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):1046–1061. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Golub E. S. Brain-associated theta antigen: reactivity of rabbit anti-mouse brain with mouse lymphoid cells. Cell Immunol. 1971 Aug;2(4):353–361. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Golub E. S., Weigle W. O. Studies on the induction of immunologic unresponsiveness. 3. Antigen form and mouse strain variation. J Immunol. 1969 Feb;102(2):389–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Greene M. I., Sugimoto M., Benacerraf B. Mechanisms of regulation of cell-mediated immune responses. I. Effect of the route of immunization with TNP-coupled syngeneic cells on the induction and suppression of contact sensitivity to picryl chloride. J Immunol. 1978 May;120(5):1604–1611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamilton J. A., Miller J. F. Hapten-specific tolerance: unresponsiveness in the T cell-depleted population. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Jul;3(7):457–460. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katz D. H., Davie J. M., Paul W. E., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten antibody responses. IV. Experimental conditions for the induction of hapten-specific tolerance or for the stimulation of anti-hapten anamnestic responses by "nonimmunogenic" hapten-polypeptide conjugates. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):201–223. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller S. D., Claman H. N. The induction of hapten-specific T cell tolerance by using hapten-modified lymphoid cells. I. Characteristics of tolerance induction. J Immunol. 1976 Nov;117(5 Pt 1):1519–1526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller S. D., Sy M. S., Claman H. N. Genetic restrictions for the induction of suppressor T cells by hapten-modified lymphoid cells in tolerance to 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene contact sensitivity. Role of the H-2D region of the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):788–799. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller S. D., Sy M. S., Claman H. N. The induction of hapten-specific T cell tolerance using hapten-modified lymphoid membranes. II. Relative roles of suppressor T cells and clone inhibition in the tolerant state. Eur J Immunol. 1977 Mar;7(3):165–170. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830070310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moorhead J. W. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFA in mice. VIII. Identification of distinct T cell subpopulations that mediate in vivo and in vitro manifestations of delayed hypersensitivity. J Immunol. 1978 Jan;120(1):137–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nachtigal D., Zan-Bar I., Feldman M. The role of specific suppressor T cells in immune tolerance. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:87–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Parks D. E., Doyle M. V., Weigle W. O. Induction and mode of action of suppressor cells generated against human gamma globulin. I. An immunologic unresponsive state devoid of demonstrable suppressor cells. J Exp Med. 1978 Sep 1;148(3):625–638. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Polak L., Macher E. In vitro sensitisation to dinitrochlorobenzene in guinea pigs. Nature. 1974 Dec 20;252(5485):748–749. doi: 10.1038/252748a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Robinson J. H., Naysmith J. D. A comparison of four methods for measuring cutaneous delayed- type hypersensitivity reactions to protein antigens in the mouse. Scand J Immunol. 1976;5(3):299–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1976.tb00282.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rowden G., Lewis M. G., Sullivan A. K. Ia antigen expression on human epidermal Langerhans cells. Nature. 1977 Jul 21;268(5617):247–248. doi: 10.1038/268247a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Scott D. W., Long C. A. Role of self-carriers in the immune response and tolerance. I. B-cell unresponsiveness and cytotoxic T-cell immunity induced by haptenated syngeneic lymphoid cells. J Exp Med. 1976 Nov 2;144(5):1369–1374. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.5.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sy M. S., Miller S. D., Kowach H. B., Claman H. N. A splenic requirement for the generation of suppressor T cells. J Immunol. 1977 Dec;119(6):2095–2099. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas D. W., Forni G., Shevach E. M., Green I. The role of the macrophage as the stimulator cell in contact sensitivity. J Immunol. 1977 May;118(5):1677–1681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vadas M. A., Miller J. F., McKenzie I. F., Chism S. E., Shen F. W., Boyse E. A., Gamble J. R., Whitelaw A. M. Ly and Ia antigen phenotypes of T cells involved in delayed-type hypersensitivity and in suppression. J Exp Med. 1976 Jul 1;144(1):10–19. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. H-2 compatability requirement for T-cell-mediated lysis of target cells infected with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Different cytotoxic T-cell specificities are associated with structures coded for in H-2K or H-2D;. J Exp Med. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1427–1436. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES