Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1978 Jul 1;148(1):182–194. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.1.182

Effect of idiotype-specific suppressor T cells on primary and secondary responses

PMCID: PMC2184922  PMID: 307588

Abstract

Previous reports have shown that suppression of idiotype can be adoptively transferred by T cells, or by rosettes containing T cells with anti-idiotypic receptors, from an idiotypically suppressed, syngeneic mouse. The present data indicate that secondary B cells are highly resistant to such suppression. Priming recipients to the relevant hapten, p-azophenylarsonate, 6 days or 4 mo before the adoptive transfer prevented suppression. This was independent of the carrier used for the hapten group during priming or subsequent immunization, suggesting that resistance to suppression is attributable to secondary cells with specificity for the hapten. The effect of suppressor T cells could also be overcome by mixing them with specifically purified B cells having receptors for the hapten group before the adoptive transfer. Adoptive transfer of the suppressed state by specifically purified B cells from suppressed, hyperimmunized animals confirmed our previous finding that the suppression of idiotype can also be caused by B cells lacking idiotypic receptors, evidently through a mechanism involving clonal dominance. Possible mechanisms of idiotypic suppression by T cells are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (948.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bangasser S. A., Kapsalis A. A., Fraker P. J., Nisonoff A. Competition for antigen by cell populations having receptors with the same specificity but of different idiotype. J Immunol. 1975 Feb;114(2 Pt 1):610–614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cosenza H., Köhler H. Specific suppression of the antibody response by antibodies to receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2701–2705. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eichmann K. Idiotype suppression. I. Influence of the dose and of the effector functions of anti-idiotypic antibody on the production of an idiotype. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Apr;4(4):296–302. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eichmann K. Idiotype suppression. II. Amplification of a suppressor T cell with anti-idiotypic activity. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Aug;5(8):511–517. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eig B. M., Ju S. T., Nisonoff A. Complete inhibition of the expression of an idiotype by a mechanism of B-cell dominance. J Exp Med. 1977 Dec 1;146(6):1574–1584. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.6.1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hart D. A., Wang A. L., Pawlak L. L., Nisonoff A. Suppression of idiotypic specificities in adult mice by administration of antiidiotypic antibody. J Exp Med. 1972 Jun 1;135(6):1293–1300. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.6.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunter R. Standardization of the chloramine-T method of protein iodination. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1970 Mar;133(3):989–992. doi: 10.3181/00379727-133-34611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. JANDL J. H., SIMMONS R. L. The agglutination and sensitization of red cells by metallic cations: interactions between multivalent metals and the red-cell membrane. Br J Haematol. 1957 Jan;3(1):19–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1957.tb05768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Janeway C. A., Jr, Murgita R. A., Weinbaum F. I., Asofsky R., Wigzell H. Evidence for an immunoglobulin-dependent antigen-specific helper T cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Oct;74(10):4582–4586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.10.4582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Julius M. H., Simpson E., Herzenberg L. A. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Oct;3(10):645–649. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klinman N. R., Pickard A. R., Sigal N. H., Gearhart P. J., Metcalf E. S., Pierce S. K. Assessing B cell diversification by antigen receptor and precursor cell analysis. Ann Immunol (Paris) 1976 Jun-Jul;127(3-4):489–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuettner M. G., Wang A. L., Nisonoff A. Quantitative investigations of idiotypic antibodies. VI. Idiotypic specificity as a potential genetic marker for the variable regions of mouse immunoglobulin polypeptide chains. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):579–595. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Owen F. L., Ju S. T., Nisonoff A. Binding to idiotypic determinants of large proportions of thymus-derived lymphocytes in idiotypically suppressed mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 May;74(5):2084–2088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Owen F. L., Ju S. T., Nisonoff A. Presence on idiotype-specific suppressor T cells of receptors that interact with molecules bearing the idiotype. J Exp Med. 1977 Jun 1;145(6):1559–1566. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.6.1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PORTER R. R. The hydrolysis of rabbit y-globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain. Biochem J. 1959 Sep;73:119–126. doi: 10.1042/bj0730119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pawlak L. L., Hart D. A., Nisonoff A. Requirements for prolonged suppression of an idiotypic specificity in adult mice. J Exp Med. 1973 Jun 1;137(6):1442–1458. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.6.1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pawlak L. L., Hart D. A., Nisonoff A. Suppression of immunological memory for a cross-reactive idiotype in adult mice. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jan;4(1):10–13. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pierce S. K., Klinman N. R. Antibody-specific immunoregulation. J Exp Med. 1977 Aug 1;146(2):509–519. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.2.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schlossman S. F., Hudson L. Specific purification of lymphocyte populations on a digestible immunoabsorbent. J Immunol. 1973 Jan;110(1):313–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Strayer D. S., Cosenza H., Lee W. M., Rowley D. A., Köhler H. Neonatal tolerance induced by antibody against antigen-specific receptor. Science. 1974 Nov 15;186(4164):640–643. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4164.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tada T., Takemori T., Okumura K., Nonaka M., Tokuhisa T. Two distinct types of helper T cells involved in the secondary antibody response: independent and synergistic effects of Ia- and Ia+ helper T cells. J Exp Med. 1978 Feb 1;147(2):446–458. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.2.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tung A. S., Ju S. T., Sato S., Nisonoff A. Production of large amounts of antibodies in individual mice. J Immunol. 1976 Mar;116(3):676–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wofsy L., Kimura J., Truffa-Bachi P. Cell separation on affinity columns: the preparation of pure populations of anti-hapten specific lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1971 Sep;107(3):725–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES