Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):890–902. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.890

The cellular basis of allograft rejection in vivo. II. The nature of memory cells mediating second set heart graft rejection

PMCID: PMC2185022  PMID: 359751

Abstract

An adoptive transfer system was used to study the cellular basis of memory in animals immunized by grafting with major histocompatibility complex incompatible tissue. Memory was characterised by a large (greater than 100 fold) increase in the potency of lymphocytes to precure graft rejection. This increase in potency endured for at least 1 yr after sensitization. The memory cells were shown to be Ig-- small lymphocytes which were long lived and which did not recirculate from blood to lymph in normal recipients although they did home to lymphoid tissue from which they could be recovered several months later. The thymus was not required either for the generation of memory cells or their maintenance. Cells carrying memory for alloantibody synthesis did recirculate normally but alloantibody synthesis was shown not to be required for rejection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (800.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARNASON B. G., JANKOVIC B. D., WAKSMAN B. H., WENNERSTEN C. Role of the thymus in immune reactions in rats. II. Suppressive effect of thymectomy at birth on reactions of delayed (cellular) hypersensitivity and the circulating small lymphocyte. J Exp Med. 1962 Aug 1;116:177–186. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. II. The origin, strength and duration of actively and adoptively acquired immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 Dec 15;143(910):58–80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BILLINGHAM R. E., SILVERS W. K., WILSON D. B. FURTHER STUDIES ON ADOPTIVE TRANSFER OF SENSITIVITY TO SKIN HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1963 Sep 1;118:397–420. doi: 10.1084/jem.118.3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. The role of regional lymphatics in the skin homograft response. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):962–966. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707001-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Biesecker J. L., Fitch F. W., Rowley D. A., Scollard D., Stuart F. P. Cellular and humoral immunity after allogeneic transplantation in the rat. II. Comparison of a 51Cr release assay and modified microcytotoxicity assay for detection of cellular immunity and blocking serum factors. Transplantation. 1973 Nov;16(5):421–431. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197311000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Canty T. G., Wunderlich J. R. Quantitative assessment of cellular and humoral responses to skin and tumor allografts. Transplantation. 1971 Feb;11(2):111–116. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197102000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dorsch S., Roser R. Recirculating, suppressor T cells in transplantation tolerance. J Exp Med. 1977 May 1;145(5):1144–1157. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.5.1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ford W. L., Simonsen M. The factor of immunization in the rat. The effect of allogeneic immunization on graft-versus-host activity. J Exp Med. 1971 Apr 1;133(4):938–949. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.4.938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gowans J. L., Uhr J. W. The carriage of immunological memory by small lymphocytes in the rat. J Exp Med. 1966 Nov 1;124(5):1017–1030. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall B. M., Dorsch S., Roser B. The cellular basis of allograft rejection in vivo. I. The cellular requirements for first-set rejection of heart grafts. J Exp Med. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):878–889. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall B. M., Roser B. J., Dorsch S. E. Magnitude of memory to the major histocompatibility complex. Nature. 1977 Aug 11;268(5620):532–534. doi: 10.1038/268532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lefford M. J., McGregor D. D., Mackaness G. B. Properties of lymphocytes which confer adoptive immunity to tuberculosis in rats. Immunology. 1973 Oct;25(4):703–715. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Raju S., Vessella R. L., Grogan J. B., Conn J. H. The unreliability of visual inspection to monitor skin graft survival times in AG-B-incompatible rat strains. Transplantation. 1974 Mar;17(3):325–327. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197403000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Roser B., Ford W. L. Prolonged lymphocytopenia in the rat. the immunological consequences of lymphocyte depletion following injection of 185 W tungsten trioxide into the spleen of lymph nodes. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1972 Apr;50(2):185–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Simpson E., O'Hopp S., Wunderlich J. Life span of cytotoxic activity and memory activity following allogeneic skin grafting in the mouse. Transplantation. 1974 Oct;18(4):374–377. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197410000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sprent J., Miller J. F. Fate of H2-activated T lymphocytes in syngeneic hosts. II. Residence in recirculating lymphocyte pool and capacity to migrate to allografts. Cell Immunol. 1976 Feb;21(2):303–313. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sprent J., Miller J. F. Fate of H2-activated T lymphocytes in syngeneic hosts. III. Differentiation into long-lived recirculating memory cells. Cell Immunol. 1976 Feb;21(2):314–326. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Strober S., Dilley J. Biological characteristics of T and B memory lymphocytes in the rat. J Exp Med. 1973 May 1;137(5):1275–1292. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.5.1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Strober S. Initiation of antibody responses by different classes of lymphocytes. V. Fundamental changes in the physiological characteristics of virgin thymus-independent ("B") lymphocytes and "B" memory cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Oct 1;136(4):851–871. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tilney N. L., Gowans J. L. The sensitization of rats by allografts transplanted to alymphatic pedicles of skin. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):951–962. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tilney N. L., Strom T. B., Macpherson S. G., Carpenter C. B. Surface properties and functional characteristics of infiltrating cells harvested from acutely rejecting cardiac allografts in inbred rats. Transplantation. 1975 Oct;20(4):323–330. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197510000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilson D. B., Blyth JL NOWELL P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. 3. Kinetics of the response. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1157–1181. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson D. B., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. V. Tempo and specificity of the proliferative response and the number of reactive cells from immunized donors. J Exp Med. 1971 Mar 1;133(3):442–453. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.3.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES