Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):850–861. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.850

Virus-replicating T cells in the immune response of mice. III. Role of vesicular stomatitis virus-replicating T cells in the antibody response

PMCID: PMC2185024  PMID: 212508

Abstract

The functional role of the T cell (Tv) which can replicate vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) on activation by the antigen was investigated in antibody response in vitro. By the inoculation of VSV into the culture, marked augmentation of antibody response to sheep erythrocytes (SRBC) was observed in the culture of spleen cells taken more than 3 days after the immunization with SRBC, suggesting that the VSV-susceptible suppressor cells were included in these spleen cells and the activity was eliminated by the effect of VSV. Development of two distinct types of suppressor T cells was revealed in the spleen of mice after the priming with SRBC. First, nylon wool nonadherent (NAd) suppressor T cells found in the spleen cells taken 3 days after immunization, and second, nylon wool adherent (Ad) suppressor T cells found in the spleen cells taken approximately 1 wk after immunization. The activity of nylon Ad suppressor T cells was completely abolished by VSV- preinfection, whereas that of nylon NAd suppressor T cells was unaffected. It was also shown that the helper T-cell activity was not influenced by VSV-preinfection. These results provided direct evidence that nylon Ad suppressor T cell but not nylon NAd suppressor T cell nor helper T cell can actually replicate VSV after antigenic stimulation. Thus it was strongly suggested that Tv represents the nylon Ad suppressor T cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (741.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Araneo B. A., Marrack P. C., Kappler J. W. Functional heterogeneity among the T-derived lymphocytes of the mouse. V. Response kinetics of peripheral T cell subpopulations. J Immunol. 1976 Oct;117(4):1233–1237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom B. R., Senik A., Stoner G., Ju G., Nowakowski M., Kano S., Jimenez L. Studies on the interactions between viruses and lymphocytes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1977;41(Pt 1):73–83. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1977.041.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cerny J., Waner E. B. Specific susceptibility of sensitized (memory) B cells to suppression and antigenic alteration by murine leukemia virus. J Immunol. 1975 Feb;114(2 Pt 1):571–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cosenza H., Leserman L. D. Cell interactions in antibody formation in vitro. I. Role of the third cell in the in vitro response of spleen cells to erythrocyte antigens. J Immunol. 1972 Feb;108(2):418–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Denman A. M., Pelton B. K., Appleford D., Kinsley M. Virus infections of lympho-reticular cells and auto-immune diseases. Transplant Rev. 1976;31:79–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldmann M., Beverley P. C., Woody J., McKenzie I. F. T-T interactions in the induction of suppressor and helper T cells: analysis of membrane phenotype of precursor and amplifier cells. J Exp Med. 1977 Apr 1;145(4):793–801. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.4.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gisler R. H., Lindahl P., Gresser I. Effects of interferon on antibody synthesis in vitro. J Immunol. 1974 Aug;113(2):438–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haskill J. S., Axelrad M. A. Cell-mediated control of an antibody response. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jun 21;237(77):251–252. doi: 10.1038/newbio237251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson H. M., Smith B. G., Baron S. Inhibition of the primary in vitro antibody response by interferon preparations. J Immunol. 1975 Jan;114(1 Pt 2):403–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jondal M., Klein G. Surface markers on human B and T lymphocytes. II. Presence of Epstein-Barr virus receptors on B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1973 Dec 1;138(6):1365–1378. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.6.1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McFarland H. F. The effect of measles virus infection on T and B lymphocytes in the mouse. I. Suppression of helper cell activity. J Immunol. 1974 Dec;113(6):1978–1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Minato N., Katsura Y. Virus-replicating T cells in the immune response of mice. I. Virus plaque assay of the lymphocytes reactive to sheep erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1977 Feb 1;145(2):390–404. doi: 10.1084/jem.145.2.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Minato N., Katsura Y. Virus-replicating T cells in the immune response of mice. II. Characterization of T cells capable of replicating vesicular stomatitis virus. J Exp Med. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):837–849. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nowakowski M., Feldman J. D., Kano S., Bloom B. R. The production of vesicular stomatitis virus by antigen- or mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes and continuous lymphoblastoid lines. J Exp Med. 1973 Apr 1;137(4):1042–1059. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.4.1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Takatsu K., Hamaoka T., Kitagawa M. Antibody production in mice. VI. Effect of anti-carrier antibody on cellular co-operation in the primary anti-hapten antibody response. Immunology. 1974 Feb;26(2):233–246. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Valdirmarsson H., Agnarsdottir G., Lachmann P. J. Measles virus receptor on human T lymphocytes. Nature. 1975 Jun 12;255(5509):554–556. doi: 10.1038/255554a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES