Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1979 Jul 1;150(1):20–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.1.20

Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. IV. (Responder × Nonresponder) F(1) T cells can be taught to preferentially help nonresponder,rather than responder, B cells

DH Katz, LR Katz, CA Bogowitz, PH Maurer
PMCID: PMC2185606  PMID: 109573

Abstract

Responses to the synthetic terpolymer L-glutamic acid, L-lysine, L-tyrosine (GLT) in the mouse are controlled by H-2-1inked Ir-GLTgenes. (Responder × nonresponder) F(1) hybrid mice, themselves phenotypic responders, can be primed with GLT to develop specific helper cells capable of interacting with 2,4-dinitrophenyl hapten (DNP)-primed F(1) B cells in response to DNP-GLT. Unlike the indiscriminant ability of F(1) helper T cells for conventional antigens (i.e. not Ir gene-controlled), which can help B cells of either parental type (as well as F(1)) equally well, GLT-primed F(1) T cells can only provide help under normal circumstances for B lymphocytes of responder parent origin; they are unable to communicate effectively with nonresponder parental B cells (1, and the present studies). The present studies reveal, however, that the induction of a parental cell-induced allogeneic effect during priming of F(1) mice to GLT actually dictates the direction of cooperating preference that will be displayed by such F(1) helper cells for B cells of one parental type or the other. Thus, F(1) T cells, primed to GLT under the influence of an allogeneic effect induced by parental BALB/c cells, develop into effective helpers for nonresponder A/J B cells, but fail to develop effective helpers for responder BALB/c B cells, and vice-versa. In contrast, F(1) T cells, primed to GLT under the influence of an allogeneic effect induced by either parental type, display significantly enhanced levels of helper activity for B cells derived from F(1) donors. These results are interpreted to reflect the existence of two interdependent events provoked by the allogeneic effect: one event augments the differentiation of GLT-specific helper T cells belonging to the subset corresponding to the opposite parental type; this would explain the development of increased helper activity provided to partner B cells of opposite parental type (as well as of F(1) origin). The second event, we postulate, involves the production of responses against the receptors which normally self-recognize native cell interaction determinants; this form of anti-idiotype response is restricted against self- recognizing receptors of the same parental type used for induction of the allogeneic effect, hence explaining diminished helper activity of such F(1) cells for partner B lymphocytes of corresponding parental type.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (714.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bellgrau D., Wilson D. B. Immunological studies of T-cell receptors. I. Specifically induced resistance to graft-versus-host disease in rats mediated by host T-cell immunity to alloreactive parental T cells. J Exp Med. 1978 Jul 1;148(1):103–114. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benacerraf B. A hypothesis to relate the specificity of T lymphocytes and the activity of I region-specific Ir genes in macrophages and B lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1978 Jun;120(6):1809–1812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KATCHALSKI E., SELA M. Synthesis and chemical properties of poly-alpha-amino acids. Adv Protein Chem. 1958;13:243–492. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60600-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Katz D. H., Davie J. M., Paul W. E., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten antibody responses. IV. Experimental conditions for the induction of hapten-specific tolerance or for the stimulation of anti-hapten anamnestic responses by "nonimmunogenic" hapten-polypeptide conjugates. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):201–223. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Dorf M. E., Maurer P. H., Benacerraf B. Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. IV. Involvement of the immune response (Ir) gene in the control of lymphocyte interactions in responses controlled by the gene. J Exp Med. 1973 Sep 1;138(3):734–739. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.3.734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz D. H., Osborne D. P., Jr The allogeneic effect in inbred mice. II. Establishment of the cellular interactions required for enhancement of antibody production by the graft-versus-host reaction. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):455–465. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Katz D. H. The allogeneic effect on immune responses: model for regulatory influences of T lymphocytes on the immune system. Transplant Rev. 1972;12:141–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katz D. H. The role of the histocompatibilty gene complex in lymphocyte defferetiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1977;41(Pt 2):611–624. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1977.041.01.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McDougal J. S., Cort S. P. Generation of T helper cells in vitro. IV. F1 T helper cells primed with antigen-pulsed parental macrophages are genetically restricted in their antigen-specific helper activity. J Immunol. 1978 Feb;120(2):445–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller J. F., Vadas M. A. The major histocompatibility complex: influence on immune reactivity and T-lymphocyte activation. Scand J Immunol. 1977;6(8):771–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1977.tb02150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ordal J. C., Grumet F. C. Genetic control of the immune response. The effect of graft-versus-host reaction on the antibody response to poly-L(Tyr, Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala--poly-L-Lys in nonresponder mice. J Exp Med. 1972 Nov 1;136(5):1195–1206. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Osborne D. P., Jr, Katz D. H. The allogeneic effect in inbred mice. 3. Unique antigenic structural requirements in the expression of the phenomenon on unprimed cell populations in vivo. J Exp Med. 1973 Apr 1;137(4):991–1008. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.4.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Osborne D. P., Jr, Katz D. H. The allogeneic effect in inbred mice. IV. Regulatory influences of graft-vs.-host reactions on host T lymphocyte functions. J Exp Med. 1973 Oct 1;138(4):825–838. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.4.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Paul W. E., Shevach E. M., Thomas D. W., Pickeral S. F., Rosenthal A. S. Genetic restriction in T-lymphocyte activation by antigen-pulse peritoneal exudate cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1977;41(Pt 2):571–578. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1977.041.01.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Press J. L., McDevitt H. O. Allotype-specific analysis of anti-(Tyr,Glu)-Ala-Lys antibodies produced by Ir-1A high and low responder chimeric mice. J Exp Med. 1977 Dec 1;146(6):1815–1820. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.6.1815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenthal A. S. Determinant selection and macrophage function in genetic control of the immune response. Immunol Rev. 1978;40:136–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz R. H. A clonal deletion model for Ir gene control of the immune response. Scand J Immunol. 1978;7(1):3–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1978.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Skidmore B. J., Katz D. H. Haplotype preference in lymphocyte differentiation. I. Development of haplotype-specific helper and suppressor activities in F1 hybrid-activated T cell populations. J Immunol. 1977 Aug;119(2):694–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Swierkosz J. E., Rock K., Marrack P., Kappler J. W. The role of H-2 linked genes in helper T-cell function. II. Isolation on antigen-pulsed macrophages of two separate populations of F1 helper T cells each specific for antigen and one set of parental H-2 products. J Exp Med. 1978 Feb 1;147(2):554–570. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.2.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas D. W., Shevach E. M. Nature of the antigenic complex recognized by T lymphocytes. V. Genetic predisposition of independent F1 T cell subpopulations responsive to antigen-pulsed parental macrophages. J Immunol. 1978 Feb;120(2):638–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yamashita U., Shevach E. M. The histocompatibility restrictions on macrophage T-helper cell interaction determine the histocompatibility restrictions on T-helper cell B-cell interaction. J Exp Med. 1978 Nov 1;148(5):1171–1185. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.5.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES