Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1979 Dec 1;150(6):1351–1358. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.6.1351

Role of prethymic cells in acquisition of self-tolerance

HO Besedovsky, A Del Rey, E Sorkin
PMCID: PMC2185723  PMID: 315991

Abstract

The sequential character of T-lymphocyte development as it pertains to the stage at which self-tolerance is acquired was investigated. Three phases were studied, defined here as prethymic, intrathymic, and postthymic as determined by the timing of thymus implantation. The model utilized was the temporal pattern of skin graft rejection in thymusless BALB/c nude mice implanted with allogeneic, C57BL/6J, or syngeneic thymuses before or after skin grafting; in some instances, F(1) hybrid spleen cells were also given to newborns or young adults. These experiments in nude mice showed that, (a) self-tolerance could be established despite the absence of the host’s own haplotype in the implanted thymus; (b) recently emigrated postthymic cells could already discriminate self from non-self; (c) specific neonatal tolerance could be induced in nudes by inoculation of F(1) hybrid cells; (d) nudes showed a higher capacity for induction of neonatal tolerance than did normal littermates. These findings indicate that the process of self-tolerance in the T cell's lineage begins during the prethymic state early in ontogeny.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (464.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BURNET M. Role of the thymus and related organs in immunity. Br Med J. 1962 Sep 29;2(5308):807–811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5308.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bevan M. J. In a radiation chimaera, host H-2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells. Nature. 1977 Sep 29;269(5627):417–418. doi: 10.1038/269417a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanden R. V., Ada G. L. A dual recognition model for cytotoxic T cells based on thymic selection of precursors with low affinity for Self H-2 antigens. Scand J Immunol. 1978 Mar;7(3):181–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1978.tb00442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanden R. V., Andrew M. E. Primary anti-viral cytotoxic T-cell responses in semiallogeneic chimeras are not absolutely restricted to host H-2 type. J Exp Med. 1979 Feb 1;149(2):535–538. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kindred B. Can tolerant allogeneic cells restore nude mice? Cell Immunol. 1975 Dec;20(2):241–246. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(75)90101-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kindred B., Loor F. Activity of host-derived T cells which differentiate in nude mice grafted with co-isogenic or allogeneic thymuses. J Exp Med. 1974 May 1;139(5):1215–1227. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.5.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kindred B. Lymphocytes which differentiate in an allogeneic thymus. I. Response to MLC determinants and skin grafts from the thymus donor strain. Cell Immunol. 1976 Aug;25(2):189–196. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90109-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loor F., Kindred B. Differentiation of T-cell precursors in nude mice demonstrated by immunofluorescence of T-cell membrane markers. J Exp Med. 1973 Nov 1;138(5):1044–1055. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.5.1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matzinger P., Mirkwood G. In a fully H-2 incompatible chimera, T cells of donor origin can respond to minor histocompatibility antigens in association with either donor or host H-2 type. J Exp Med. 1978 Jul 1;148(1):84–92. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pritchard H., Micklem H. S. Immune responses in congenitally thymus-less mice. I. Absence of response to oxazolone. Clin Exp Immunol. 1972 Jan;10(1):151–161. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stutman O. Intrathymic and extrathymic T cell maturation. Immunol Rev. 1978;42:138–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zinkernagel R. M., Callahan G. N., Althage A., Cooper S., Streilein J. W., Klein J. The lymphoreticular system in triggering virus plus self-specific cytotoxic T cells: evidence for T help. J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):897–911. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. Major transplantation antigens, viruses, and specificity of surveillance T cells. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1977;7:179–220. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3054-7_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. von Boehmer H., Haas W., Jerne N. K. Major histocompatibility complex-linked immune-responsiveness is acquired by lymphocytes of low-responder mice differentiating in thymus of high-responder mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 May;75(5):2439–2442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.5.2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES