Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1980 Jan 1;151(1):115–132. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.1.115

Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in fully allogeneic bone marrow chimera in mice

K Onoe, G Fernandes, RA Good
PMCID: PMC2185763  PMID: 6985646

Abstract

AKR mice were protected from lethal irradiation and established as long-lived chimeras by transplanting allogeneic C57BL/6 (B6) bone marrow that had been treated in vitro with anti-Thy-1 antiserum without complement. In these chimeras, which were designated [B6 {arrow} AKR], virtually all the thymus and spleen cells were shown to be derived from the B6 donor; several immune functions studied in these chimeras were as follows: (a) The chimeric mice were tolerant of histocompatibility antigens of both donor and recipient strain and nearly fully reactive to antigens of third party, as revealed by Simonsen's splenomegaly assay. The tolerance of these chimeras could not be attributed to suppressor cells but was compatible with clonal depletion. (b) Proliferative responses to concanavalin A, phytohemagglutinin, and lipopolysaccharide as well as natural killer and antibody-dependent cell- mediated cytotoxicity activity of the chimeric mice was normal. (c) Plaque- forming cell (PFC) assays of antibody responses to sheep erythrocytes (SRBC) showed gross deficiency in the primary response of the [B6 {arrow} AKR] and [AKR {arrow} B6] chimeras. By contrast, [B6-H-2(k)(E(k)) {arrow} AKR] H-2-compatible chimeras and [AKR {arrow} AKR] syngeneic marrow transplanted mice had normal primary PFC responses. PFC responses after secondary stimulation with SRBC, however, revealed vigorous direct plaque formation and substantial but somewhat smaller indirect plaque formation in the [B6 {arrow} AKR] chimeras. This observation favors operationally the concept of adaptive differentiation proposed by Katz et al. (44). (d) Analysis of ability of the chimeras to develop and express delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to contact sensitizer (2,4-dinitro-l-fluorobenzene [DNFB]) showed no apparent immunodeficiency of either chimeras to this form of immunization. Development of immunologic tolerance to DNFB, however, was grossly deficient in [B6 {arrow} AKR] chimeras but normal in [AKR {arrow} AKR], [B6 {arrow} B6], and [E(k) {arrow} AKR] chimeras. These findings indicate that full chimeras across major histocompatibility complex have considerable immunologic vigor even though primary immune responses that require histocompatibility between interacting cell types are initially defective.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Asherson G. L., Mayhew B., Perera M. A. The production of contact sensitivity by the injection into the footpads of recipients of the lymph node cells from mice 1 day after painting the skin with contact sensitizing agent: requirement for matching at the major histocompatibility complex between donor and recipient mice. Immunology. 1979 May;37(1):241–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bevan M. J. In a radiation chimaera, host H-2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells. Nature. 1977 Sep 29;269(5627):417–418. doi: 10.1038/269417a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Claman H. N., Miller S. D., Moorhead J. W. Tolerance: two pathways of negative immunoregulation in contact sensitivity to DNFB. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1977;41(Pt 1):105–111. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1977.041.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Conlon P. J., Moorhead J. W., Claman H. N. Efficient induction of immediate tolerance to contact sensitivity by hapten-modified spleen cells requires Ia+ cells compatible with recipient. Nature. 1979 Mar 15;278(5701):257–259. doi: 10.1038/278257a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cudkowicz G., Bennett M. Peculiar immunobiology of bone marrow allografts. II. Rejection of parental grafts by resistant F 1 hybrid mice. J Exp Med. 1971 Dec 1;134(6):1513–1528. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Erb P., Meier B., Kraus D., von Boehmer H., Feldmann M. Nature of T cell-macrophage interaction in helper cell induction in vitro. I. Evidence for genetic restriction of T cell-macrophage interactions prior to T cell priming. Eur J Immunol. 1978 Nov;8(11):786–792. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830081107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Erb P., Meier B., Matsunaga T., Feldmann M. Nature of T-cell macrophage interaction in helper-cell induction in vitro. II. Two stages of T-helper-cell differentiation analyzed in irradiation and allophenic chimeras. J Exp Med. 1979 Mar 1;149(3):686–701. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.3.686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fernandes G., Handwerger B. S., Yunis E. J., Brown D. M. Immune response in the mutant diabetic C57BL/Ks-dt+ mouse. Discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo immunological assays. J Clin Invest. 1978 Feb;61(2):243–250. doi: 10.1172/JCI108933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fernandes G., Nair M., Onoe K., Tanaka T., Floyd R., Good R. A. Impairment of cell-mediated immunity functions by dietary zinc deficiency in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):457–461. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gengozian N., Congdon C. C., Allen E. A., Toya R. E. Immune status of allogeneic radiation chimeras. Transplant Proc. 1971 Mar;3(1):434–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gengozian N., Urso P. Status of T- and B-cell cooperation in radiation chimeras: evidence for a suppressor effect. Transplant Proc. 1976 Dec;8(4):631–635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Handwerger B. S., Koren H. S. The nature of the effector cell in antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytolysis (ADCC): the cytotoxic activity of murine tumor cells and peritoneal macrophages. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1976 Mar;5(2):272–281. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(76)90032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansen J. A., O'Reilly R. J., Good R. A., Dupont B. Relevance of major human histocompatibility determinants in clinical bone marrow transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1976 Dec;8(4):581–589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herberman R. B., Nunn M. E., Holden H. T., Lavrin D. H. Natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lymphoid cells against syngeneic and allogeneic tumors. II. Characterization of effector cells. Int J Cancer. 1975 Aug 15;16(2):230–239. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910160205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hong R., Schulte-Wissermann H., Jarrett-Toth E., Horowitz S. D., Manning D. D. Transplantation of cultured thymic fragments. II. Results in nude mice. J Exp Med. 1979 Feb 1;149(2):398–415. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunziker N., Winkelmann R. K. Langerhans cells in contact dermatitis of the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol. 1978 Sep;114(9):1309–1313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Benacerraf B. Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. II. Failure of physiologic cooperative interactions between T and B lymphocytes from allogeneic donor strains in humoral response to hapten-protein conjugates. J Exp Med. 1973 Jun 1;137(6):1405–1418. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.6.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz D. H., Katz L. R., Bogowitz C. A., Skidmore B. J. Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. II. The thymic microenvironment does not restrict the cooperative partner cell preference of helper T cells differentiating in F1 leads to F1 thymic chimeras. J Exp Med. 1979 Jun 1;149(6):1360–1370. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.6.1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katz D. H., Skidmore B. J., Katz L. R., Bogowitz C. A. Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. I. Both T and B lymphocytes differentiating in F1 transplanted to parental chimeras manifest preferential cooperative activity for partner lymphocytes derived from the same parental type corresponding to the chimeric host. J Exp Med. 1978 Sep 1;148(3):727–745. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.3.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klareskog L., Tjernlund U., Forsum U., Peterson P. A. Epidermal Langerhans cells express Ia antigens. Nature. 1977 Jul 21;268(5617):248–250. doi: 10.1038/268248a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Korngold R., Sprent J. Lethal graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation across minor histocompatibility barriers in mice. Prevention by removing mature T cells from marrow. J Exp Med. 1978 Dec 1;148(6):1687–1698. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.6.1687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mathé G., Schwarzenberg L., Halle-Pannenko O., Abuaf N., Pouillart P. Of mice and men in bone marrow transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1977 Mar;9(1):155–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mattingly J. A., Webb P. M. Studies on the mitogen responses of germfree allogeneic chimeras. II. Maturation of two cell types and partial restoration of responsiveness of the short-term chimeras. J Immunol. 1978 Apr;120(4):1274–1277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McCombs C., Michalski J. P., Talal N. Cellular interactions in lymphocyte proliferation: effect of syngeneic and xenogeneic macrophages. Cell Immunol. 1976 May;23(2):283–296. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(76)90194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller J. F., Vadas M. A., Whitelaw A., Gamble J. Role of major histocompatibility complex gene products in delayed-type hypersensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jul;73(7):2486–2490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nordin A. A., Farrar J. J. Studies of the immunological capacity of germfree mouse radiation chimeras. III. In vitro reconstitution of the T-helper cell deficiency. Cell Immunol. 1974 Feb;10(2):218–225. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90113-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Phanuphak P., Moorhead J. W., Claman H. N. Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. I. In vivo detection by ear swelling and correlation with in vitro cell stimulation. J Immunol. 1974 Jan;112(1):115–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pierce C. W., Kapp J. A., Benacerraf B. Regulation by the H-2 gene complex of macrophage-lymphoid cell interactions in secondary antibody responses in vitro. J Exp Med. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):371–381. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reisner Y., Itzicovitch L., Meshorer A., Sharon N. Hemopoietic stem cell transplantation using mouse bone marrow and spleen cells fractionated by lectins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):2933–2936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Singer A., Hathcock K. S., Hodes R. J. Cellular and genetic control of antibody responses. V. Helper T-cell recognition of H-2 determinants on accessory cells but not B cells. J Exp Med. 1979 May 1;149(5):1208–1226. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.5.1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Slavin S., Reitz B., Bieber C. P., Kaplan H. S., Strober S. Transplantation tolerance in adult rats using total lymphoid irradiation: permanent survival of skin, heart, and marrow allografts. J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):700–707. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sprent J., Boehmer H. V., Nabholz M. Association of immunity and tolerance to host H-2 determinants in irradiated F1 hybrid mice reconstituted with bone marrow cells from one parental strain. J Exp Med. 1975 Aug 1;142(2):321–331. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.2.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sprent J., von Boehmer H. T-helper function of parent leads to F1 chimeras. Presence of a separate T-cell subgroup able to stimulate allogeneic B cells but not syngeneic B cells. J Exp Med. 1979 Feb 1;149(2):387–397. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.2.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stoecker C. A., Rickard B. M., Abel C. A. Effect of T- and B-lymphocyte mitogens on interactions between lymphocytes and macrophages. Cell Immunol. 1978 Feb;35(2):362–377. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(78)90156-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stout R. D., Herzenberg L. A. The Fc receptor on thymus-derived lymphocytes: II. Mitogen responsiveness of T lymphocytes bearing the Fc receptor. J Exp Med. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1041–1051. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sy M. S., Miller S. D., Moorhead J. W., Claman H. N. Active suppression of 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene-immune T cells. Requirement of an auxiliary T cell induced by antigen. J Exp Med. 1979 May 1;149(5):1197–1207. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.5.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Trier L., Rubin B. Bone marrow transplantation in inbred strains of mice. I. The failure of development of normal T cell function following allogeneic transplantation. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Oct;82B(5):724–732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Urso P., Gengozian N. Variation in T and B cell deficiency in different mouse allogeneic radiation chimeras. J Immunol. 1974 Dec;113(6):1770–1779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zinkernagel R. M., Callahan G. N., Althage A., Cooper S., Klein P. A., Klein J. On the thymus in the differentiation of "H-2 self-recognition" by T cells: evidence for dual recognition? J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):882–896. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zinkernagel R. M., Callahan G. N., Althage A., Cooper S., Streilein J. W., Klein J. The lymphoreticular system in triggering virus plus self-specific cytotoxic T cells: evidence for T help. J Exp Med. 1978 Mar 1;147(3):897–911. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. von Boehmer H., Hudson L., Sprent J. Collaboration of histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes using cells from tetraparental bone marrow chimeras. J Exp Med. 1975 Oct 1;142(4):989–997. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.4.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES