Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1980 Mar 1;151(3):651–666. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.3.651

Kidney-specific alloantigen system in the rat. Characterization and role in transplantation

PMCID: PMC2185818  PMID: 6987327

Abstract

The alloantibody response of LEW rats immunized with DA kidney homogenate or given vascularized DA kidney grafts was studied using an 125I-anti-Ig binding assay with kidney homogenate as the target tissue. A major component of the sera was found to be directed at a kidney- specific alloantigen. Analysis of LEW X (DA X LEW) F1 backcross rats showed that the locus coding for this antigen was not linked to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The use of these backcross rats, typed for both MHC and the kidney alloantigen, as kidney donors to LEW rats showed that the kidney alloantigen did not induce detectable graft damage and that only the DA MHC was involved in primary graft rejection of DA kidneys by LEW rats. Immunofluorescence studies localized the antigen to the basement membrane of proximal convoluted tubules, and to some Bowman's capsules. Strain distribution studies showed that only 2 of 11 strains were negative for the allele under study; these were the LEW and AS strains. Species cross- reactivity studies showed that rabbit, dog, and human kidneys could absorb this specificity, although more weakly than DA kidney.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbas A. K., Corson J. M., Carpenter C. B., Strom T. B., Merrill J. P., Dammin G. J. Immunologic enhancement of rat renal allografts. III. Immunopathologic lesions and rejection in long-surviving passively enhanced grafts. Am J Pathol. 1975 May;79(2):255–270. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bildsoe P. Organ transplantation in the rat. The importance of the Ag-B (or H-1) locus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1972;80(2):221–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyle W. An extension of the 51Cr-release assay for the estimation of mouse cytotoxins. Transplantation. 1968 Sep;6(6):761–764. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196809000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carter P. B., Sunderland C. A. Rat alloantisera ART and Ly-1 detect a polymorphism of a leukocyte-common antigen. Transplant Proc. 1979 Sep;11(3):1646–1647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fabre J. W., Morris P. J. Studies on the specific suppression of renal allograft rejection in presensitised rats. Theoretical and clinical implications. Transplantation. 1975 Feb;19(2):121–133. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197502000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fabre J. W., Williams A. F. Quantitative serological analysis of a rabbit anti-rat lymphocyte serum and preliminary biochemical characterisation of the major antigen recognised. Transplantation. 1977 Apr;23(4):349–359. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197704000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fabre J., Lim S. H., Morris P. J. Renal transplantation in the rat: details of a technique. Aust N Z J Surg. 1971 Aug;41(1):69–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldman J. D., Pick E., Lee S., Silvers W. K., Wilson D. B. Renal homotransplantation in rats. II. Tolerant recipients. Am J Pathol. 1968 Mar;52(3):687–700. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hart D. N., Fabre J. W. Quantitative studies on the tissue distribution of Ia and SD antigens in the DA and Lewis rat strains. Transplantation. 1979 Feb;27(2):110–119. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197902000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kashiwabara H., Wakashin Y., Benitani A., Oomori K., Hachisu T., Shishido H., Yokoyama T., Wakashin M., Iwasaki Y. Role of antibody to tubular basement membrane (TBM) antigen in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1979 Mar;11(1):434–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klassen J., Kano K., Milgrom F., Menno A. B., Anthone S., Anthone R., Sepulveda M., Elwood C. M., Andres G. A. Tubular lesions produced by autoantibodies to tubular basement membrane in human renal allografts. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1973;45(5):675–689. doi: 10.1159/000231067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lehman D. H., Lee S., Wilson C. B., Dixon F. J. Induction of antitubular basement membrane antibodies in rats by renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1974 Apr;17(4):429–431. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197404000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lobel S. A., Abeyounis C. J., Milgrom F. Studies on skin-reacting transplantation antibodies. Transplantation. 1978 Oct;26(4):239–244. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197810000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Milgrom F., Klassen J., Kano K. Autoimmunity and homograft rejection. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1970 Feb;7(2):264–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morris P. J., Law W. K. HL-A antigens on kidney cells and the use of kidney cells as a target in the detection of donor specific cytotoxic antibodies in renal transplantation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1974 Apr;52(2):349–360. doi: 10.1038/icb.1974.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morris R. J., Williams A. F. Antigens on mouse and rat lymphocytes recognized by rabbit antiserum against rat brain: the quantitative analysis of a xenogeneic antiserum. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Apr;5(4):274–281. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Opelz G., Terasaki P. I. Histocompatibility matching utilizing responsiveness as a new dimension. Transplant Proc. 1972 Dec;4(4):433–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pierce J. C., Waller M., Phibbs M. A mixed antiglobulin test with kidney cells in suspension for IgG antibody in human allograft recipients. Transplantation. 1975 Apr;19(4):343–348. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197504000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scheid M., Boyse E. A., Carswell E. A., Old L. J. Serologically demonstrable alloantigens of mouse epidermal cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):938–955. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schierman L. W., McBride R. A. Adjuvant activity of erythrocyte isoantigens. Science. 1967 May 5;156(3775):658–659. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3775.658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Rood J. J., Balner R., Gabb B. W., Dersjant H., Van Vreeswijk W. Major histocompatibility locus of rhesus monkeys (RhL-A). Nat New Biol. 1971 Apr 7;230(14):177–180. doi: 10.1038/newbio230177a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Westbroek D. L., Silberbusch J., Vriesendorp H. M., Van Urk H., Roemeling H. W., Schönherr-Scholtes Y., De Vries M. J. The influence of DL-A histocompatibility on the function and pathohistological changes in unmodified canine renal allografts. Transplantation. 1972 Nov;14(5):582–589. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197211000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams A. F. Differentiation antigens of the lymphocyte cell surface. Contemp Top Mol Immunol. 1977;6:83–116. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2841-4_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams G. M., Hume D. M., Hudson R. P., Jr, Morris P. J., Kano K., Milgrom F. "Hyperacute" renal-homograft rejection in man. N Engl J Med. 1968 Sep 19;279(12):611–618. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196809192791201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams R. J., Eyres K., Mallick N. P., Orr W., Taylor G., Williams G. Allograft immunity to histocompatibility and organ-specific antigens. Transplantation. 1976 Mar;21(3):188–194. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197603000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Williams R. J., Mallick N. P., Taylor G., Orr W. M. The early diagnosis of rejection by the leucocyte migration test in cadaveric renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol. 1974;2(3):100–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson C. B., Lehman D. H., McCoy R. C., Gunnells J. C., Jr, Stickel D. L. Antitubular basement membrane antibodies after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1974 Nov;18(5):447–452. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197411000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES