Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1981 Sep 1;154(3):921–934. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.921

Monoclonal antibody to an IgD allotype induces a new type of allotype suppression in the mouse

PMCID: PMC2186469  PMID: 6974220

Abstract

Studies presented here show that perinatal exposure to anti-IgD allotype antibodies induces a persistant IgG-allotype suppression in the mouse that differs markedly from either the short-term or chronic allotype suppressions induced by antibodies to IgG or IgM allotypes. This novel form of allotype suppression induced by injecting neonatal BALB/c x SJL mice with monoclonal antibody to the paternal Igh-5b (IgD) allotype drastically reduces paternal allotype production during the first 6 mo of the affected animal's life and simultaneously stimulates compensatory production of maternal allotype IgG. In addition, it interferes with the development of B cells carrying the paternal IgD allotype and impairs the development of memory B cells destined to give rise to paternal allotype IgG-producing cells. Thus, its properties make it more like allotype suppression as described in the rabbit than like the known forms of allotype suppression in the mouse. As shown here, Igh-5b-bearing (5b+) B cells are completely depleted from the neonate after anti-5b exposure and only gradually appear as the animal ages. The recovery of the 5b+ population to near normal size (by approximately 14 wk of age) substantially preceeds recovery of the ability to generate normal-size memory B cell populations. Paternal allotype levels in serum remain well below normal until the anti-5b- exposed animals reach approximately 6 mo of age and then climb rapidly, finally stabilizing at levels comparable to levels in controls of the same age. The elevated maternal allotype levels characteristic of the suppression period began falling somewhat earlier and are clearly stabilized within the normal range in 6-mo-old animals. Thus, perinatal exposure to anti-5b compromises B cell development and IgG production throughout early adulthood but has little apparent effect in older animals. Perinatal exposure to antibody to the paternal IgG2a allotype (Igh-1b) or IgM allotype (Igh-6b), in contrast, induces a chronic allotype suppression that has relatively little affect on IgG production in young adults but severely suppresses allotype production in older animals. Furthermore, this type of (chronic) suppression does not influence maternal allotype production and does not interfere with memory B cell development. These differences, illustrated here by data from parallel sets of animals exposed either toi anti-5b or anti-1b, raise a series of intriguing questions concerning the mechanisms regulating B cell development and expression and the nature of the neonatal (B) cell populations with which the suppression-inducing antibodies react.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (863.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abney E. R., Cooper M. D., Kearney J. F., Lawton A. R., Parkhouse R. M. Sequential expression of immunoglobulin on developing mouse B lymphocytes: a systematic survey that suggests a model for the generation of immunoglobulin isotype diversity. J Immunol. 1978 Jun;120(6):2041–2049. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black S. J., Herzenberg L. A. B-cell influences on the induction of allotype suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1979 Jul 1;150(1):174–183. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.1.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DRAY S. Effect of maternal isoantibodies on the quantitative expression of two allelic genes controlling gamma-globulin allotypic specificities. Nature. 1962 Aug 18;195:677–680. doi: 10.1038/195677a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harrison M. R., Mage R. G. Allotype suppression in the rabbit. I. The ontogeny of cells bearing immunoglobulin of paternal allotype and the fate of these cells after treatment with antiallotype antisera. J Exp Med. 1973 Oct 1;138(4):764–774. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.4.764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herzenberg L. A., Black S. J., Tokuhisa T., Herzenberg L. A. Memory B cells at successive stages of differentiation. Affinity maturation and the role of IgD receptors. J Exp Med. 1980 May 1;151(5):1071–1087. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.5.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herzenberg L. A., Chan E. L., Ravitch M. M., Riblet R. J., Herzenberg L. A. Active suppression of immunoglobulin allotype synthesis. 3. Identification of T cells as responsible for suppression by cells from spleen, thymus, lymph node, and bone marrow. J Exp Med. 1973 Jun 1;137(6):1311–1324. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.6.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herzenberg L. A., Herzenberg L. A. Short-term and chronic allotype suppression in mice. Contemp Top Immunobiol. 1974;3:41–75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3045-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herzenberg L. A., Okumura K., Cantor H., Sato V. L., Shen F. W., Boyse E. A., Herzenberg L. A. T-cell regulation of antibody responses: demonstration of allotype-specific helper T cells and their specific removal by suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1976 Aug 1;144(2):330–344. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.2.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herzenberg L. A., Okumura K., Metzler C. M. Regulation of immunoglobulin and antibody production by allotype suppressor T cells in mice. Transplant Rev. 1975;27:57–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobson E. B., Herzenberg L. A. Active suppression of immunoglobulin allotype synthesis. I. Chronic suppression after perinatal exposure to maternal antibody to paternal allotype in (SJL x BALB-c)F 1 mice. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1151–1162. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacobson E. B., Herzenberg L. A., Riblet R., Herzenberg L. A. Active suppression of immunoglobulin allotype synthesis. II. Transfer of suppressing factor with spleen cells. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1163–1176. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobson E. B. In vitro studies of allotype suppression in mice. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Oct;3(10):619–624. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kincade P. W., Lawton A. R., Bockman D. E., Cooper M. D. Suppression of immunoglobulin G synthesis as a result of antibody-mediated suppression of immunoglobulin M synthesis in chickens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Dec;67(4):1918–1925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.4.1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Layton J. E., Johnson G. R., Scott D. W., Nossal G. J. The anti-delta suppressed mouse. Eur J Immunol. 1978 May;8(5):325–330. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830080507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ledbetter J. A., Herzenberg L. A. Xenogeneic monoclonal antibodies to mouse lymphoid differentiation antigens. Immunol Rev. 1979;47:63–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1979.tb00289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Manning D. D., Jutila J. W. Immunosuppression in mice injected with heterologous anti-immunoglobulin antisera. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):282–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oi V. T., Jones P. P., Goding J. W., Herzenberg L. A., Herzenberg L. A. Properties of monoclonal antibodies to mouse Ig allotypes, H-2, and Ia antigens. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1978;81:115–120. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-67448-8_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pierce C. W., Solliday S. M., Asofsky R. Immune responses in vitro. V. Suppression of M, G, and A plaque-forming cell responses in cultures of primed mouse spleen cells by class-specific antibody to mouse immunoglobulins. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):698–710. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wanebo H. J., Gallmeier W. M., Boyse E. A., Old L. J. Paraproteinemia and reticulum cell sarcoma in an inbred mouse strain. Science. 1966 Nov 18;154(3751):901–903. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3751.901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yamada A., Adler L. T., Adler F. L. A role for clonal dominance in the maintenance of allotype suppression? J Exp Med. 1979 Oct 1;150(4):888–897. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.4.888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES