Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1981 Nov 1;154(5):1652–1670. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.5.1652

Murine syngeneic mixed lymphocyte response. I. Target antigens are self Ia molecules

LH Glimcher, DL Longo, I Green, RH Schwartz
PMCID: PMC2186517  PMID: 6170721

Abstract

A system has been described that produces a murine syngeneic mixed lymphocyte response (MLR) comparable in magnitude to an allogeneic MLR. The responder cells in these cultures exhibit the classic immunologic characteristics of both memory and specificity. Studies using radiation-induced bone marrow chimeras of F(1) {arrow} parent type indicated that, similar to many other T cell-mediated immune responses, the response of the T lymphocytes in the syngeneic MLR was major histocompatibility complex-restricted and was determined by the environment in which the T cells matured. Using responder T cells from F(1) {arrow} parent chimeras and stimulator cells from H-2 recombinant strains, it was possible to map the genes involved in the stimulation to the K and/or I regions. In addition, blocking studies with monoclonal anti-Ia antibodies suggested that in the B10.A strain the critical molecules were products of both the I-A(k) and I-E(k) subregions. The issue of whether the syngeneic MLR is directed solely at self I-region antigens or whether the response represents proliferation to an unknown antigen in association with self I-region determinants was also addressed. Secondary syngeneic MLR were successfully performed in normal mouse serum and with stimulator cells prepared in the absence of bovine serum albumin to rule out the possibility that xenogeneic serum antigens were involved in the stimulation. The possibility that the syngeneic MLR might represent a secondary response to environmental antigens was eliminated by using germ- free mice as a source of stimulator cells and by demonstrating that spleen cells from unimmunized, fully allogeneic chimeras (B10.A {arrow} B10) could generate a normal syngeneic MLR even though such chimeras could not be primed to respond to any foreign antigens unless supplemented in vivo with a source of antigen-presenting cells syngeneic to the B10 host. The possibility that the syngeneic MLR was a primary response to a foreign antigen was considered unlikely because by using our culture conditions we could not obtain a primary antigen response or a secondary antigen response after in vitro priming to a variety of potent foreign antigens. Finally, the possibility that the syngeneic MLR represents a response to a variety of minor histocompatibility self antigens in association with self Ia molecules was eliminated by showing that the secondary responses to H-2 compatible, non-H-2 different strain (A/J vs. B10.A and C3H, or BALB/c vs. B10.D2 and DBA/2) were comparable to the secondary responses to syngeneic stimulators. Thus, we conclude that the target antigens in the syngeneic MLR are solely determinants on self Ia molecules, although the functionally equivalent possibility of a single, nonpolymorphic, minor self antigen seen in association with self Ia molecules cannot be excluded.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beale M. G., MacDermott R. P., Stacey M. C., Nash G. S., Hahn B. H., Seiden M. V., Jacobs S. L., Loewenstein L. S. Stimulating cell types in the autologous mixed leukocyte reaction in man. J Immunol. 1980 Jan;124(1):227–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beller D. I., Unanue E. R. Thymic maturation in vitro by a secretory product from macrophages. J Immunol. 1977 May;118(5):1780–1787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bevan M. J., Fink P. J. The influence of thymus H-2 antigens on the specificity of maturing killer and helper cells. Immunol Rev. 1978;42:3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bevan M. J. In a radiation chimaera, host H-2 antigens determine immune responsiveness of donor cytotoxic cells. Nature. 1977 Sep 29;269(5627):417–418. doi: 10.1038/269417a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanden R. V., Andrew M. E. Primary anti-viral cytotoxic T-cell responses in semiallogeneic chimeras are not absolutely restricted to host H-2 type. J Exp Med. 1979 Feb 1;149(2):535–538. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.2.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Glimcher L. H., Steinberg A. D., House S. B., Green I. The autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction in strains of mice with autoimmune disease. J Immunol. 1980 Oct;125(4):1832–1838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hausman P. B., Raff H. V., Gilbert R. C., Picker L. J., Stobo J. D. T cells and macrophages involved in the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction are required for the response to conventional antigen. J Immunol. 1980 Sep;125(3):1374–1379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hedrick S. M., Watson J. Genetic control of the immune response to collagen. II. Antibody responses produced in fetal liver restored radiation chimeras and thymus reconstituted F1 hybrid nude mice. J Exp Med. 1979 Sep 19;150(3):646–652. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.3.646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodes R. J., Hathcock K. S., Singer A. Cellular and genetic control of antibody responses. VI. Expression of Ir gene function by H-2a accessory cells, but not H-2a T or B cells in responses to TNP-(T,G)-A--L. J Immunol. 1979 Dec;123(6):2823–2829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hünig T., Schimpl A. Studies on the generation and expression of H-2-controlled T helper function in chimeric mice: evidence for two levels of H-2 resitriction. Eur J Immunol. 1979 Sep;9(9):730–736. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830090912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janeway C. A., Wigzell H., Binz H. Two different VH gene products make up the T-cell receptors. Scand J Immunol. 1976;5(9):993–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1976.tb03051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jerne N. K. The somatic generation of immune recognition. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones P. P., Murphy D. B., McDevitt H. O. Two-gene control of the expression of a murine Ia antigen. J Exp Med. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):925–939. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kappler J. W., Marrack P. The role of H-2 linked genes in helper T-cell function. IV. Importance of T-cell genotype and host environment in I-region and Ir gene expression. J Exp Med. 1978 Dec 1;148(6):1510–1522. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.6.1510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz D. H., Skidmore B. J., Katz L. R., Bogowitz C. A. Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. I. Both T and B lymphocytes differentiating in F1 transplanted to parental chimeras manifest preferential cooperative activity for partner lymphocytes derived from the same parental type corresponding to the chimeric host. J Exp Med. 1978 Sep 1;148(3):727–745. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.3.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuntz M. M., Innes J. B., Weksler M. E. Lymphocyte transformation induced by autologous cells. IV. Human T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by autologous or allogeneic non-T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1976 May 1;143(5):1042–1054. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.5.1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Longo D. L., Schwartz R. H. Gene complementation. Neither Ir-GLphi gene need be present in the proliferative T cell to generate an immune response to Poly(Glu55Lys36Phe9)n. J Exp Med. 1980 Jun 1;151(6):1452–1467. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.6.1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Longo D. L., Schwartz R. H. Inhibition of antigen-induced proliferation of T cells from radiation-induced bone marrow chimeras by a monoclonal antibody directed against an Ia determinant on the antigen-presenting cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):514–518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Matzinger P., Bevan M. J. Hypothesis: why do so many lymphocytes respond to major histocompatibility antigens? Cell Immunol. 1977 Mar 1;29(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90269-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Matzinger P., Mirkwood G. In a fully H-2 incompatible chimera, T cells of donor origin can respond to minor histocompatibility antigens in association with either donor or host H-2 type. J Exp Med. 1978 Jul 1;148(1):84–92. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nussenzweig M. C., Steinman R. M. Contribution of dendritic cells to stimulation of the murine syngeneic mixed leukocyte reaction. J Exp Med. 1980 May 1;151(5):1196–1212. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.5.1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Opelz G., Kiuchi M., Takasugi M., Terasaki P. I. Autologous stimulation of human lymphocyte subpopulation. J Exp Med. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1327–1333. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ponzio N. M., Finke J. H., Battisto J. R. Adult murine lymph node cells respond blastogenically to a new differentiation antigen on isologous and autologous B lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1975 Mar;114(3):971–975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Raff H. V., Picker L. J., Stobo J. D. Macrophage heterogeneity in man. A subpopulation of HLA-DR-bearing macrophages required for antigen-induced T cell activation also contains stimulators for autologous-reactive T cells. J Exp Med. 1980 Sep 1;152(3):581–593. doi: 10.1084/jem.152.3.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sachs D. H., el-Gamil M., Arn J. S., Ozato K. Complementation between I region genes is revealed by a hybridoma anti-Ia antibody. Transplantation. 1981 Apr;31(4):308–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schwartz R. H. A clonal deletion model for Ir gene control of the immune response. Scand J Immunol. 1978;7(1):3–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1978.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Singer A., Hathcock K. S., Hodes R. J. Self recognition in allogeneic radiation bone marrow chimeras. A radiation-resistant host element dictates the self specificity and immune response gene phenotype of T-helper cells. J Exp Med. 1981 May 1;153(5):1286–1301. doi: 10.1084/jem.153.5.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith J. B., Pasternak R. D. Syngeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction in mice: strain distribution, kinetics, participating cells, and absence in NZB mice. J Immunol. 1978 Nov;121(5):1889–1892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sprent J., Boehmer H. V., Nabholz M. Association of immunity and tolerance to host H-2 determinants in irradiated F1 hybrid mice reconstituted with bone marrow cells from one parental strain. J Exp Med. 1975 Aug 1;142(2):321–331. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.2.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sprent J. Features of cells controlling H-2-restricted presentation of antigen to T helper cells in vivo. J Immunol. 1980 Nov;125(5):2089–2096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sprent J. Role of H-2 gene products in the function of T helper cells from normal and chimeric mice in vivo. Immunol Rev. 1978;42:108–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Thomas D. W., Shevach E. M. Nature of the antigenic complex recognized by T lymphocytes. I. Analysis with an in vitro primary response to soluble protein antigens. J Exp Med. 1976 Nov 2;144(5):1263–1273. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.5.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Von Boehmer H., Adams P. B. Syngeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction between thymocytes and peripheral lymphoid cells in mice: strain specificity and nature of the target cell. J Immunol. 1973 Feb;110(2):376–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Waldmann H. The influence of the major histocompatibility complex on the function of T-helper cells in antibody formation. Immunol Rev. 1978;42:202–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weksler M. E., Kozak R. Lymphocyte transformation induced by autologous cells. V. Generation of immunologic memory and specificity during the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction. J Exp Med. 1977 Dec 1;146(6):1833–1838. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.6.1833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yamashita U., Shevach E. M. The syngeneic mixed leukocyte reaction: the genetic requirements for the recognition of self resemble the requirements for the recognition of antigen in association with self. J Immunol. 1980 Apr;124(4):1773–1778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zinkernagel R. M., Callahan G. N., Klein J., Dennert G. Cytotoxic T cells learn specificity for self H-2 during differentiation in the thymus. Nature. 1978 Jan 19;271(5642):251–253. doi: 10.1038/271251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zinkernagel R. M. Thymus and lymphohemopoietic cells: their role in T cell maturation in selection of T cells' H-2-restriction-specificity and in H-2 linked Ir gene control. Immunol Rev. 1978;42:224–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES