Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1982 Oct 1;156(4):1025–1041. doi: 10.1084/jem.156.4.1025

Immunoselection of tumor cell variants by mice suppressed with ultraviolet radiation

PMCID: PMC2186818  PMID: 7153707

Abstract

It has previously been shown that mice exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UV) fail to reject highly immunogenic UV-induced tumors, which are regularly rejected by normal mice. The present study shows, however, that this immunosuppresion is incomplete, as UV-treated mice can still mount certain tumor-specific immune responses and reject smaller inocula of tumor cells that regularly grow progressively in athymic nude mice. Furthermore, all tumor cell lines that were reisolated from the tumor mass resulting from one tumor passage through UV-treated recipients heritably lost a tumor-specific determinant present on the parental tumor cells used for transplantation, and a large percentage of these reisolated variant tumors had changed to progressively growing tumors, in that they were no longer rejected by normal mice. In contrast, none of the tumors reisolated from passage through athymic nude mice or anti-idiotypically suppressed mice showed this change in antigenicity and progressive growth behavior. Thus, it appears that the phenotypic change in tumors reisolated from UV-treated mice was caused by immunoselection, and that the tumor-specific immunity in these mice apparently restrained the outgrowth of the parental tumor cells despite the partial immunosuppression. Because of the regularity at which tumor variants arose in the UV-treated mice after tumor transplantation, it appears that the partial immunosuppression caused by UV-treatment may have favored the outgrowth of antigenic variants from the parental tumor cell population, possibly by allowing more time for the generation of tumor variants. A similar immunoselection process might be part of tumor progression during tumor development and preferentially occur in cancer-bearing individuals showing concomitant tumor immunity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Daynes R. A., Fernandez P. A., Woodward J. G. Cell-mediated immune response to syngeneic ultraviolet-induced tumors. II. The properties and antigenic specificities of cytotoxic T lymphocytes generated in vitro following removal from syngeneic tumor-immunized mice. Cell Immunol. 1979 Jul;45(2):398–414. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(79)90400-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Daynes R. A., Spellman C. W. Evidence for the generation of suppressor cells by ultraviolet radiation. Cell Immunol. 1977 Jun 1;31(1):182–187. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90018-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daynes R. A., Spellman C. W., Woodward J. G., Stewart D. A. Studies into the transplantation biology of ultraviolet light-induced tumors. Transplantation. 1977 Apr;23(4):343–348. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197704000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doherty P. C., Zinkernagel R. M. A biological role for the major histocompatibility antigens. Lancet. 1975 Jun 28;1(7922):1406–1409. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher M. S., Kripke M. L. Further studies on the tumor-specific suppressor cells induced by ultraviolet radiation. J Immunol. 1978 Sep;121(3):1139–1144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher M. S., Kripke M. L. Systemic alteration induced in mice by ultraviolet light irradiation and its relationship to ultraviolet carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Apr;74(4):1688–1692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.4.1688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flood P. M., Kripke M. L., Rowley D. A., Schreiber H. Suppression of tumor rejection by autologous anti-idiotypic immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2209–2213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.2209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flood P. M., Urban J. L., Kripke M. L., Schreiber H. Loss of tumor-specific and idiotype-specific immunity with age. J Exp Med. 1981 Aug 1;154(2):275–290. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glasebrook A. L., Fitch F. W. Alloreactive cloned T cell lines. I. Interactions between cloned amplifier and cytolytic T cell lines. J Exp Med. 1980 Apr 1;151(4):876–895. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.4.876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hurt S. N., Berke G., Clark W. A rapid method for generating cytotoxic effector cells in vivo. J Immunol Methods. 1979;28(3-4):321–329. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(79)90197-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ioachim H. L., Keller S. E., Dorsett B. H., Pearse A. Induction of partial immunologic tolerance in rats and progressive loss of cellular antigenicity in Gross virus lymphoma. J Exp Med. 1974 Jun 1;139(6):1382–1394. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.6.1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kripke M. L. Antigenicity of murine skin tumors induced by ultraviolet light. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974 Nov;53(5):1333–1336. doi: 10.1093/jnci/53.5.1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kripke M. L., Fisher M. S. Immunologic parameters of ultraviolet carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1976 Jul;57(1):211–215. doi: 10.1093/jnci/57.1.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kripke M. L. Latency, histology, and antigenicity of tumors induced by ultraviolet light in three inbred mouse strains. Cancer Res. 1977 May;37(5):1395–1400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oldham R. K., Ortaldo J. R., Holden H. T., Herberman R. B. Cytotoxicity inhibition assay: cryopreservation and standardization: brief communication. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Oct;59(4):1321–1323. doi: 10.1093/jnci/59.4.1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roberts L. K., Daynes R. A. Modification of the immunogenic properties of chemically induced tumors arising in hosts treated concomitantly with ultraviolet light. J Immunol. 1980 Jul;125(1):438–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sarmiento M., Glasebrook A. L., Fitch F. W. IgG or IgM monoclonal antibodies reactive with different determinants on the molecular complex bearing Lyt 2 antigen block T cell-mediated cytolysis in the absence of complement. J Immunol. 1980 Dec;125(6):2665–2672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmitt M., Daynes R. A. Heterogeneity of tumorigenicity phenotype in murine tumors. I. Characterization of regressor and progressor clones isolated from a nonmutagenized ultraviolet regressor tumor. J Exp Med. 1981 May 1;153(5):1344–1359. doi: 10.1084/jem.153.5.1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Scott J. V., Stowring L., Haase A. T., Narayan O., Vigne R. Antigenic variation in visna virus. Cell. 1979 Oct;18(2):321–327. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spellman C. W., Daynes R. A. Immunoregulation by ultraviolet light-III. Enhancement of suppressor cell activity in older animals. Exp Gerontol. 1978;13(3-4):141–146. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(78)90006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Spellman C. W., Daynes R. A. Ultraviolet light induced murine suppressor lymphocytes dictate specificity of anti-ultraviolet tumor immune responses. Cell Immunol. 1978 Jun;38(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(78)90028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thorn R. M. Specific inhibition of cytotoxic memory cells produced against UV-induced tumors in UV-irradiated mice. J Immunol. 1978 Nov;121(5):1920–1926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thorn R. M. Specific inhibition of cytotoxic memory cells produced against UV-induced tumors in UV-irradiated mice. J Immunol. 1978 Nov;121(5):1920–1926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Urban J. L., Burton R. C., Holland J. M., Kripke M. L., Schreiber H. Mechanisms of syngeneic tumor rejection. Susceptibility of host-selected progressor variants to various immunological effector cells. J Exp Med. 1982 Feb 1;155(2):557–573. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES