Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1982 Dec 1;156(6):1842–1847. doi: 10.1084/jem.156.6.1842

Selection of restriction specificities of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells in the thymus: no evidence for a crucial role of antigen- presenting cells

PMCID: PMC2186878  PMID: 6184436

Abstract

The proposal was tested that (P1 X P2) F1 leads to P1 irradiation bone marrow chimeras expressed predominantly P1-restricted T cells because donor derived stem cells were exposed to recipient derived antigen- presenting cells in the thymus. Because P1 recipient-derived antigen- presenting cells are replaced only slowly after 6-8 wk by (P1 X P2) donor-derived antigen-presenting cells in the thymus and because replenished pools of mature T cells may by then prevent substantial numbers of P2-restricted T cells to be generated, a large portion of thymus cells and mature T cells were eliminated using the following treatments of 12-20-wk-old (P1 X P2) F1 leads to P1 irradiation bone marrow chimeras: (a) cortisone plus antilymphocyte serum, (b) Cytoxan, (c) three doses of sublethal irradiation (300 rad) 2d apart, and (d) lethal irradiation (850 rad) and reconstitution with T cell-depleted (P1 X P2) F1 stem cells. 12-20 wk after this second treatment, (P1 X P2) leads to P1 chimeras were infected with vaccinia-virus. Virus- specific cytotoxic T cell reactivity was expressed by chimeric T cells of (P1 X P[2) F1 origin and was restricted predominantly to P1. Virus- specific cytotoxic T cells, therefore, do not seem to be selected to measurable extent by the immigrating donor-derived antigen-presenting cells in the thymus; their selection depends apparently from the recipient-derived radioresistant thymus cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (398.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bevan M. J., Fink P. J. The influence of thymus H-2 antigens on the specificity of maturing killer and helper cells. Immunol Rev. 1978;42:3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1978.tb00256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rouse R. V., Weissman I. L. Microanatomy of the thymus: its relationship to T cell differentiation. Ciba Found Symp. 1981;84:161–177. doi: 10.1002/9780470720660.ch9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wekerle H., Ketelsen U. P., Ernst M. Thymic nurse cells. Lymphoepithelial cell complexes in murine thymuses: morphological and serological characterization. J Exp Med. 1980 Apr 1;151(4):925–944. doi: 10.1084/jem.151.4.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zinkernagel R. M., Althage A., Callahan G., Welsh R. M., Jr On the immunocompetence of H-2 incompatible irradiation bone marrow chimeras. J Immunol. 1980 May;124(5):2356–2365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zinkernagel R. M., Doherty P. C. MHC-restricted cytotoxic T cells: studies on the biological role of polymorphic major transplantation antigens determining T-cell restriction-specificity, function, and responsiveness. Adv Immunol. 1979;27:51–177. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60262-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES