Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1983 Mar 1;157(3):957–973. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.3.957

Suppressor T cell memory. II. The role of memory suppressor T cells in tolerance to human gamma globulin

PMCID: PMC2186967  PMID: 6187882

Abstract

The transient presence of suppressor T cell (Ts) activity in high-dose tolerance to human gamma globulin (HGG), and its (apparent) absence in low-dose tolerance, have been advanced as strong evidence against the concept that Ts play an important role in maintenance of immunological unresponsiveness. To analyze this question, CBA mice were exposed to high or low doses of deaggregated HGG (dHGG) and later challenged with HGG in immunogenic form (aHGG); their capacity to mount a primary or secondary suppressive response was assessed in an adoptive hapten- carrier system. Primary suppression reached a maximum 7 d after high- dose tolerance induction and gradually waned thereafter, being no longer detectable by day 30-35. Subsequent challenge of tolerant mice with aHGG, however, led to a rapid reactivation of suppression that bore the hallmarks of an anamnestic secondary response, and this effect was still demonstrable 135 d after tolerance induction. It was also shown that a single low dose of dHGG was capable of generating memory for suppression despite the absence of detectable primary suppression, indicating that the latter is not a prerequisite for induction of memory cells. The results were interpreted as indicating that tolerance, like immunity, is a manifestation of specific immunological memory. If tolerance to self-antigens is maintained by a similar mechanism, it would be expected that memory Ts could be induced during the early stages of fetal development. Mice were therefore exposed to tolerogen in utero by injection of their mothers with dHGG at day 7 of gestation, and were assessed at various times after birth for the capacity to exhibit primary or secondary suppression in adoptive transfer. Nonspecific suppression masked any specific effects during the first 5 wk of life. Antigen-specific, primary suppression was demonstrable subsequently until 10-12 wk of age, and if the animals were challenged with aHGG before transfer an anamnestic secondary suppressive response could be elicited up to 6 mo of age. These observations are consistent with the notion that memory Ts may play an important role in the maintenance of self-tolerance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldo-Benson M., Borel Y. The tolerant cell: direct evidence for receptor blockade by tolerogen. J Immunol. 1974 May;112(5):1793–1803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker P. J. Homeostatic control of antibody responses: a model based on the recognition of cell-associated antibody by regulatory T cells. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:3–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basten A., Miller J. F., Johnson P. T cell-dependent suppression of an anti-hapten antibody response. Transplant Rev. 1975;26:130–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basten A., Miller J. F., Loblay R., Johnson P., Gamble J., Chia E., Pritchard-Briscoe H., Callard R., McKenzie I. F. T cell-dependent suppression of antibody production. I. Characteristics of suppressor T cells following tolerance induction. Eur J Immunol. 1978 May;8(5):360–370. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830080513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell E. B., Shand F. L., Gradwell S. Cellular events in protein-tolerant inbred rats. IV. The mechanism of immunogen-maintained tolerance. Eur J Immunol. 1977 Jun;7(6):406–412. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830070615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin D. C. Evidence for specific suppression in the maintenance of immunologic tolerance. J Exp Med. 1975 Mar 1;141(3):635–646. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.3.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borel Y. Induction of immunological tolerance by a hapten (DNP) bound to a non-immunogenic protein carrier. Nat New Biol. 1971 Apr 7;230(14):180–182. doi: 10.1038/newbio230180a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bretscher P., Cohn M. A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science. 1970 Sep 11;169(3950):1042–1049. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3950.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Byrt P., Ada G. L. An in vitro reaction between labelled flagellin or haemocyanin and lymphocyte-like cells from normal animals. Immunology. 1969 Oct;17(4):503–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cambier J. C., Kettman J. R., Vitetta E. S., Uhr J. W. Differential susceptibility of neonatal and adult murine spleen cells to in vitro induction of B-cell tolerance. J Exp Med. 1976 Jul 1;144(1):293–297. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.1.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colby W. D., Strejan G. H. Immunological tolerance of the mouse IgE system: dissociation between T cell tolerance and suppressor cell activity. Eur J Immunol. 1980 Aug;10(8):602–608. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830100806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dowden S. J., Sercarz E. E. The X-Y-Z scheme of immunocyte maturation. II. The effect of antigen on spontaneous escape from immune paralysis. J Immunol. 1967 Apr;98(4):827–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Doyle M. V., Parks E., Weigle W. O. Specific, transient suppression of the immune response by HGG tolerant spleen cells. II. Effector cells and target cells. J Immunol. 1976 Oct;117(4):1152–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eardley D. D., Sercarz E. E. Recall of specific suppression: co-dominance of suppression after primary or secondary antigen stimulation. J Immunol. 1977 Apr;118(4):1306–1310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elson C. J., Taylor R. B. Permanent hapten-specific tolerance in B lymphocytes. Immunology. 1975 Mar;28(3):543–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Etlinger H. M., Chiller J. M. Induction of tolerance in athymic mice with an antigen which is highly immunogenic in euthymic mice. Cell Immunol. 1977 Oct;33(2):297–308. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Feldmann M., Kontiainen S. Suppressor cell induction in vitro. II. Cellular requirements of suppressor cell induction. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Apr;6(4):302–305. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830060413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fidler J. M., Golub E. S. Induction of tolerance to a hapten. II. Maintenance and escape of the tolerant state to TNP. J Immunol. 1973 Aug;111(2):317–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Infectious immunological tolerance. Immunology. 1971 Dec;21(6):903–914. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. HUMPHREY J. H. IMMUNOLOGICAL UNRESPONSIVENESS TO PROTEIN ANTIGENS IN RABBITS. I. THE DURATION OF UNRESPONSIVENESS FOLLOWING A SINGLE INJECTION AT BIRTH. Immunology. 1964 Jul;7:449–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamilton J. A., Miller J. F., Kettman J. Hapten-specific tolerance in mice. II. Adoptive transfer studies and evidence for unresponsiveness in the B cells. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Apr;4(4):268–276. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katz D. H., Borel Y. Hapten-specific tolerance induced by hapten conjugates of D-glutamic acid, D-lysine (D-Gl) or isologous gamma-globulin: evidence for central B cell tolerance in the presence of carrier-primed helper T cells. J Immunol. 1978 Jun;120(6):1824–1827. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Benacerraf B. Immunological tolerance in bone marrow-derived lymphocytes. 3. Tolerance induction in primed B cells by hapten conjugates of unrelated immunogenic or "nonimmunogenic" carriers. J Exp Med. 1974 Jun 1;139(6):1464–1472. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.6.1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Benacerraf B. Immunological tolerance in bone marrow-derived lymphocytes. I. Evidence for an intracellular mechanism of inactivation of hapten-specific precursors of antibody-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Dec 1;136(6):1404–1429. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.6.1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kilshaw P. J., Brent L., Pinto M. Suppressor T cells in mice made unresponsive to skin allografts. Nature. 1975 Jun 5;255(5508):489–491. doi: 10.1038/255489a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim B. S., Hopkins W. J. Tolerance rendered by neonatal treatment with anti-idiotypic antibodies: induction and maintenance in athymic mice. Cell Immunol. 1978 Feb;35(2):460–465. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(78)90164-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Klaus G. G. B cell tolerance induced by polymeric antigens. II. Effects of tolerance on hapten-binding lymphocyte levels in primary and secondary antibody responses. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Jun;5(6):366–372. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. LEDERBERG J. Genes and antibodies. Science. 1959 Jun 19;129(3364):1649–1653. doi: 10.1126/science.129.3364.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leech S. H., Mitchison N. A. Effect of prior sensitization with hapten on the antibovine IgG antibody response to hapten-conjugated tolerogen of mice tolerized by low doses of bovine IgG. Eur J Immunol. 1976 Nov;6(11):810–816. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830061111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Loblay R. H., Pritchand-Briscoe H., Basten A. Suppressor T-cell memory. Nature. 1978 Apr 13;272(5654):620–622. doi: 10.1038/272620a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mosier D. E., Mathieson B. J., Campbell P. S. Ly phenotype and mechanism of action of mouse neonatal suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1977 Jul 1;146(1):59–73. doi: 10.1084/jem.146.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nossal G. J., Pike B. L. Evidence for the clonal abortion theory of B-lymphocyte tolerance. J Exp Med. 1975 Apr 1;141(4):904–917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nossal G. J., Pike B. L., Katz D. H. Induction of B cell tolerance in vitro to 2,4-dinitrophenyl coupled to a copolymer of D-glutamic acid and D-lysine (DNP-D-GL). J Exp Med. 1973 Jul 1;138(1):312–317. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.1.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Parks D. E., Doyle M. V., Weigle W. O. Induction and mode of action of suppressor cells generated against human gamma globulin. I. An immunologic unresponsive state devoid of demonstrable suppressor cells. J Exp Med. 1978 Sep 1;148(3):625–638. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Parks D. E., Shaller D. A., Weigle W. O. Induction and mode of action of suppressor cells generated against human gamma globulin. II. Effects of colchicine. J Exp Med. 1979 May 1;149(5):1168–1182. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.5.1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Scibienski R. J., Harris L. M., Fong S., Benjamini E. Active and inactive states of immunologic unresponsiveness. J Immunol. 1974 Jul;113(1):45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Takemori T., Tada T. Selective roles of thymus-derived lymphocytes in the antibody response. II. Preferential suppression of high-affinity antibody-forming cells by carrier-primed suppressor T cells. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):253–266. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Trizio D., Cudkowicz G. Effect of selective T cell priming on anti-sheep and anti-hapten humoral responses. I. Acceleration, augmentation, and reversal of IgG:IgM ratios. J Immunol. 1978 Mar;120(3):1021–1027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vadas M. A., Miller J. F., McKenzie I. F., Chism S. E., Shen F. W., Boyse E. A., Gamble J. R., Whitelaw A. M. Ly and Ia antigen phenotypes of T cells involved in delayed-type hypersensitivity and in suppression. J Exp Med. 1976 Jul 1;144(1):10–19. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Warren R. W., Murphy S., Davie J. M. Role of t lymphocytes in the humoral immune response. II. T cell-mediated regulation of antibody avidity. J Immunol. 1976 May;116(5):1385–1390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Waters C. A., Pilarski L. M., Wegmann T. G., Diener E. Tolerance induction during ontogeny. I. Presence of active suppression in mice rendered tolerant to human gamma-globulin in utero correlates with the breakdown of the tolerant state. J Exp Med. 1979 May 1;149(5):1134–1151. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.5.1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Weigle W. O., Chiller J. M., Habicht G. S. Effect of immunological unresponsiveness on different cell populations. Transplant Rev. 1972;8:3–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Werblin T. P., Siskind G. W. Effect of tolerance and immunity on antibody affinity. Transplant Rev. 1972;8:104–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zembala M., Asherson G. L. Depression of the T cell phenomenon of contact sensitivity by T cells from unresponsive mice. Nature. 1973 Jul 27;244(5413):227–228. doi: 10.1038/244227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES