Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1985 Jul 1;162(1):311–323. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.1.311

Repertoires of T cells directed against a large protein antigen, beta- galactosidase. II. Only certain T helper or T suppressor cells are relevant in particular regulatory interactions

PMCID: PMC2187682  PMID: 2409208

Abstract

11 cyanogen bromide (CB) peptides, comprising 70% of the large protein, Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase (GZ), were studied for their ability to induce T suppressor (Ts) cells capable of strongly suppressing the in vitro anti-fluorescein (FITC) response to GZ-FITC. Only CB-2 (amino acid residues 3-92) and CB-3 (residues 93-187) were found to bear such Ts-inducing epitopes. In examining the specificity of T helper cell (Th) targets susceptible to CB-2 and CB-3-specific Ts, it appeared that only nearly Th targets could be suppressed. Thus, CB- 10-primed Th were not suppressed by either Ts; even CB-3-primed Ts did not suppress CB-2-specific Th, although CB-2-specific Ts were effective. Furthermore, analysis of the suppression pattern revealed a hierarchical use of potential epitopes on native GZ in triggering functional regulatory T cells. A dominant Th epitope near the amino terminus of GZ tops a hierarchy of potential Th, most of which are never engaged. The dominant determinant seems to exist on the peptide CB-2-3 (residues 3-187), and presumably is destroyed by its cleavage at Met 92; the Th cells that it induces are suppressible by each of the Ts- inducing peptides. In the GZ system, where the native antigen is quite large, the interactions between Th and Ts are highly circumscribed. This may be attributable to the topology of antigen fragments produced during processing; any relevant fragment must bear at least a Ts- and Th-reactive determinant to permit intercellular regulation. A final implication of these results is that, not only does the existence of a Th-inducing determinant depend on its being an appropriate distance from a B cell epitope, but the existence of Ts-inducing determinants likewise depends on the existence of a neighboring Th-B cell association.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (822.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adorini L., Harvey M. A., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Fine specificity of regulatory T cells. II. Suppressor and helper T cells are induced by different regions of hen egg-white lysozyme in a genetically nonresponder mouse strain. J Exp Med. 1979 Aug 1;150(2):293–306. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.2.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Araneo B. A., Yowell R. L., Sercarz E. E. Ir gene defects may reflect a regulatory imbalance. I. Helper T cell activity revealed in a strain whose lack of response is controlled by suppression. J Immunol. 1979 Sep;123(3):961–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asano Y., Hodes R. J. T cell regulation of B cell activation. An antigen-mediated tripartite interaction of Ts cells, Th cells, and B cells is required for suppression. J Immunol. 1984 Dec;133(6):2864–2867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxevanis C. N., Nagy Z. A., Klein J. The nature of the interaction between suppressor and helper T cells in the response to LDHB. J Immunol. 1983 Aug;131(2):628–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berzofsky J. A. T-B reciprocity. An Ia-restricted epitope-specific circuit regulating T cell-B cell interaction and antibody specificity. Surv Immunol Res. 1983;2(3):223–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02918417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chesnut R. W., Grey H. M. Studies on the capacity of B cells to serve as antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol. 1981 Mar;126(3):1075–1079. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fowler A. V. Amino acid sequence of beta-galactosidase. VII. Isolation of the 24 cyanogen bromide peptides. J Biol Chem. 1978 Aug 10;253(15):5499–5504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fresno M., Nabel G., McVay-Boudreau L., Furthmayer H., Cantor H. Antigen-specific T lymphocyte clones. I. Characterization of a T lymphocyte clone expressing antigen-specific suppressive activity. J Exp Med. 1981 May 1;153(5):1246–1259. doi: 10.1084/jem.153.5.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kapp J. A., Pierce C. W., Schlossman S., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of immune responses in vitro. V. Stimulation of suppressor T cells in nonresponder mice by the terpolymer L-glutamic acid 60-L-alanine 30-L-tyrosine 10 (GAT). J Exp Med. 1974 Sep 1;140(3):648–659. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.3.648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Katz M. E., Maizels R. M., Wicker L., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Immunological focusing by th mouse major histocompatibility complex: mouse strains confronted with distantly related lysozymes confine their attention to very few epitopes. Eur J Immunol. 1982 Jul;12(7):535–540. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830120702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koch N., Arnold B., Hämmerling G. J., Heuer J., Kölsch E. Structural comparison of I-A antigens produced by a cloned murine T suppressor cell line with B-cell-derived I-A. Immunogenetics. 1983;17(5):497–505. doi: 10.1007/BF00696873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krzych U., Fowler A. V., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Repertoires of T cells directed against a large protein antigen, beta-galactosidase. I. Helper cells have a more restricted specificity repertoire than proliferative cells. J Immunol. 1982 Apr;128(4):1529–1534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mage M. G., McHugh L. L., Rothstein T. L. Mouse lymphocytes with and without surface immunoglobulin: preparative scale separation in polystyrene tissue culture dishes coated with specifically purified anti-immunoglobulin. J Immunol Methods. 1977;15(1):47–56. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(77)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maizels R. M., Clarke J. A., Harvey M. A., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Epitope specificity of the T cell proliferative response to lysozyme: proliferative T cells react predominantly to different determinants from those recognized by B cells. Eur J Immunol. 1980 Jul;10(7):509–515. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830100705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller A. A model implicating altered macrophage function in H-2 linked nonresponsiveness to hen lysozyme. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1978;98:131–139. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8858-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller J. E., Hochstein L. I. A salt-inhibited cytochrome c reductase obtained from the moderately halophilic bacterium, Micrococcus halodenitrificans. J Bacteriol. 1972 Oct;112(1):656–659. doi: 10.1128/jb.112.1.656-659.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwartz M., Waltenbaugh C., Dorf M., Cesla R., Sela M., Benacerraf B. Determinants of antigenic molecules responsible for genetically controlled regulation of immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Aug;73(8):2862–2866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.8.2862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Swanborg R. H. Antigen-induced inhibition of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. III. Localization of an inhibitory site distinct from the major encephalitogenic determinant of myelin basic protein. J Immunol. 1975 Jan;114(1 Pt 1):191–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tada T., Takemori T. Selective roles of thymus-derived lymphocytes in the antibody response. I. Differential suppressive effect of carrier-primed T cells on hapten-specific IgM and IgG antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):239–252. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Trial J., Kapp J. A., Pierce C. W., Shreffler D. C., Sorensen C. M., Waltenbaugh C. Expression of cell surface antigens by suppressor T cell hybridomas. I. Comparison of phenotype and function. J Immunol. 1983 Feb;130(2):565–572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Turkin D., Sercarz E. E. Key antigenic determinants in regulation of the immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Sep;74(9):3984–3987. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolf B., Janeway C. A., Jr, Coombs R. R., Catty D., Gell P. G., Kelus A. S. Immunoglobulin determinants on the lymphocytes of normal rabbits. 3. As4 and As6 determinants on individual lymphocytes and the concept of allelic exclusion. Immunology. 1971 Jun;20(6):931–944. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES