Abstract
The results of this study confirm results published by others by showing that sublethal whole-body irradiation of mice bearing immunogenic tumors can result in complete tumor regression. The results show, in addition, that irradiation-induced tumor regression can be prevented by infusion, after irradiation, of Ly-1+,2-,L3T4+ suppressor T cells from the spleens of donors bearing an established tumor, but not by infusion of normal spleen cells. This evidence, plus the demonstration that irradiation fails to cause regression of tumors growing in immunocompetent mice, is consistent with the hypothesis that irradiation-induced regression is immunologically mediated, and that it depends on the ability of irradiation to preferentially eliminate suppressor T cells. By using passive transfer assays to measure the production of effector T cells and suppressor T cells against time of tumor growth, it was shown that irradiation of tumor-bearing mice on day 5 of tumor growth resulted in a failure to generate suppressor T cells on the one hand, and in a sustained production, effector T cells on the other. In other words, irradiation prevented the concomitant antitumor immune response from being downregulated by suppressor T cells. However, giving radiation on day 1 of tumor growth, in contrast to giving it 3-6 d later, caused immunodepression and enhancement of tumor growth. This is in keeping with published evidence showing that, whereas resting effector T cells are highly radiosensitive, antigen- activated effector T cells are relatively radioresistant. It is suggested that the radioresistance of activated effector T cells, coupled with the radiosensitivity of activated suppressor T cells, is the reason for the selectivity of ionizing radiation for suppressor T cells and why a tumor needs to be palpable to undergo regression in response to radiation therapy.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (798.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson R. E., Warner N. L. Ionizing radiation and the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1976;24:215–335. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60331-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dye E. S., North R. J. Adoptive immunization against an established tumor with cytolytic versus memory T cells. Immediate versus delayed onset of regression. Transplantation. 1984 Jun;37(6):600–605. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198406000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hellström K. E., Hellström I., Kant J. A., Tamerius J. D. Regression and inhibition of sarcoma growth by interference with a radiosensitive T-cell population. J Exp Med. 1978 Sep 1;148(3):799–804. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.3.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenthal J. W., Harris A. W. Activation of mouse lymphocytes inhibits induction of rapid cell death by x-irradiation. J Immunol. 1985 Aug;135(2):1119–1125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- North R. J. Down-regulation of the antitumor immune response. Adv Cancer Res. 1985;45:1–43. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60265-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- North R. J., Dye E. S. Ly 1+2- suppressor T cells down-regulate the generation of Ly 1-2+ effector T cells during progressive growth of the P815 mastocytoma. Immunology. 1985 Jan;54(1):47–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- North R. J. Gamma-irradiation facilitates the expression of adoptive immunity against established tumors by eliminating suppressor T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1984;16(3):175–181. doi: 10.1007/BF00205425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- North R. J. The murine antitumor immune response and its therapeutic manipulation. Adv Immunol. 1984;35:89–155. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60575-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]