Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1990 Nov 1;172(5):1367–1375. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.5.1367

Differences defined by bone marrow transplantation suggest that lpr and gld are mutations of genes encoding an interacting pair of molecules

PMCID: PMC2188663  PMID: 2230649

Abstract

Homozygosity for either of the lymphoproliferation (lpr) or generalized lymphoproliferative disease (gld) mutations of mice causes the development of systemic lupus erythematosus-like autoimmune syndromes that are characterized by severe lymphadenopathy and highly elevated serum immunoglobulin levels. Although the mutations are nonallelic, analysis of homozygous lpr/lpr and gld/gld mice on the same strain background has indicated that the pathology and severity of the autoimmune syndromes induced by these mutations are indistinguishable. To explain this, it has previously been suggested that lpr and gld may represent mutations in molecules involved in sequential steps of an intracellular metabolic pathway of T cells. We have now investigated the behavior of both lpr and gld in a variety of bone marrow chimeras and have found that functional differences between lpr and gld become apparent after bone marrow transfer. Transfer of lpr/lpr bone marrow to irradiated congenic +/+ recipients caused the development of a graft- vs.-host-like lymphoid wasting syndrome, whereas transfer of gld/gld bone marrow to +/+ recipients resulted in development of a gld-like autoimmune syndrome. Additionally, gld/gld hosts behaved like +/+ hosts irrespective of the genotype of the donor bone marrow, whereas lpr/lpr hosts behaved unlike +/+ hosts when reconstituted with either lpr/lpr, gld/gld, or +/+ bone marrow. These are the first clear differences between these two mutations yet described. Our studies indicate that the molecule altered by the gld mutation is expressed only by bone marrow-derived cells, whereas the molecule altered by the lpr mutation is expressed by both bone marrow-derived cells and by one or more peripheral radioresistant cell populations. To reconcile these differences with the fact that homozygous lpr/lpr and gld/gld mice are indistinguishable, we suggest an alternative model for the relationship between the lpr and gld mutations in which the two molecules affected represent an interacting ligand-receptor pair expressed by different cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (777.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davidson W. F., Dumont F. J., Bedigian H. G., Fowlkes B. J., Morse H. C., 3rd Phenotypic, functional, and molecular genetic comparisons of the abnormal lymphoid cells of C3H-lpr/lpr and C3H-gld/gld mice. J Immunol. 1986 Jun 1;136(11):4075–4084. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davidson W. F., Holmes K. L., Roths J. B., Morse H. C., 3rd Immunologic abnormalities of mice bearing the gld mutation suggest a common pathway for murine nonmalignant lymphoproliferative disorders with autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Feb;82(4):1219–1223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.4.1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fujiwara M., Kariyone A. One-way occurrence of graft-versus-host disease in bone marrow chimaeras between congenic MRL mice. Immunology. 1984 Oct;53(2):251–256. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Matsuzawa A., Moriyama T., Kaneko T., Tanaka M., Kimura M., Ikeda H., Katagiri T. A new allele of the lpr locus, lprcg, that complements the gld gene in induction of lymphadenopathy in the mouse. J Exp Med. 1990 Feb 1;171(2):519–531. doi: 10.1084/jem.171.2.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Seldin M. F., Reeves J. P., Scribner C. L., Roths J. B., Davidson W. F., Morse H. C., 3rd, Steinberg A. D. Effect of xid on autoimmune C3H-gld/gld mice. Cell Immunol. 1987 Jun;107(1):249–255. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(87)90284-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shultz L. D., Sidman C. L. Genetically determined murine models of immunodeficiency. Annu Rev Immunol. 1987;5:367–403. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.05.040187.002055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Theofilopoulos A. N., Balderas R. S., Gozes Y., Aguado M. T., Hang L. M., Morrow P. R., Dixon F. J. Association of lpr gene with graft-vs.-host disease-like syndrome. J Exp Med. 1985 Jul 1;162(1):1–18. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yui K., Wadsworth S., Yellen A., Hashimoto Y., Kokai Y., Greene M. I. Molecular and functional properties of novel T cell subsets in C3H-gld/gld and nude mice. Implications for thymic and extrathymic maturation. Immunol Rev. 1988 Aug;104:121–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1988.tb00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES