Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1988 Jul 1;168(1):357–373. doi: 10.1084/jem.168.1.357

Influences of antigen processing on the expression of the T cell repertoire. Evidence for MHC-specific hindering structures on the products of processing

PMCID: PMC2188979  PMID: 2456373

Abstract

Two lines of evidence in the current study indicate that antigen processing is a major factor, in addition to MHC binding and T cell repertoire, that determines Ir gene responsiveness and epitope immunodominance. First, immunization with synthetic peptides of myoglobin sequences revealed new reactivities that had not appeared after priming with native myoglobin. For example, B10.S mice (H-2S) immune to equine myoglobin predominantly responded to peptide 102-118, whereas there was little, if any, response to this peptide in B10.BR (H- 2k) mice immunized with native equine myoglobin. However, after immunization with the 102-118 peptide, both strains responded to the peptide. After in vitro restimulation, B10.BR T cells responded as well as B10.S T cells. Similarly, some individual 102-118-specific T cell clones from mice of both haplotypes showed similar dose responses and fine specificity patterns. Thus, low responsiveness to this site is due neither to a hole in the repertoire nor to a failure to bind to the appropriate MHC molecule. An alternative explanation was suggested by the observation that, whereas B10.S T cells from peptide 102-118-immune mice responded almost as well to whole myoglobin as to the peptide, the B10.BR T cells from peptide immune mice, while responding well to peptide, were poorly stimulated by whole myoglobin. Thus, the product of natural processing of equine myoglobin probably has hindering structures in the regions flanking the core epitope 102-118 that interfere with presentation by I-Ak but not I-AS. The second line of evidence that processing of native myoglobin may influence the apparent specificity of the T cell response was obtained using the I-Ad- restricted sperm whale myoglobin 102-118-specific clone 9.27. This clone discriminated readily between whole sperm whale myoglobin and equine myoglobin, but it did not distinguish between peptides corresponding to 102-118 of the sperm whale and equine sequences. This distinction between equine peptide and native equine myoglobin could be overcome by artificial "processing" of equine myoglobin with cyanogen bromide. In both sets of experiments, F1 APCs that present the same epitope well to T cells of another haplotype failed to overcome the defect, which was therefore not due to the availability of different processed cleavage fragments in APC of different haplotypes, as would be expected if there were MHC-linked processing. Thus, the differential responses to peptides versus native molecule for both I-Ad- and I-Ak- restricted clones appeared to depend on the restricting molecule used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen P. M., Unanue E. R. Differential requirements for antigen processing by macrophages for lysozyme-specific T cell hybridomas. J Immunol. 1984 Mar;132(3):1077–1079. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babbitt B. P., Allen P. M., Matsueda G., Haber E., Unanue E. R. Binding of immunogenic peptides to Ia histocompatibility molecules. 1985 Sep 26-Oct 2Nature. 317(6035):359–361. doi: 10.1038/317359a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkower I., Buckenmeyer G. K., Berzofsky J. A. Molecular mapping of a histocompatibility-restricted immunodominant T cell epitope with synthetic and natural peptides: implications for T cell antigenic structure. J Immunol. 1986 Apr 1;136(7):2498–2503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berkower I., Buckenmeyer G. K., Gurd F. R., Berzofsky J. A. A possible immunodominant epitope recognized by murine T lymphocytes immune to different myoglobins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4723–4727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berkower I., Kawamura H., Matis L. A., Berzofsky J. A. T cell clones to two major T cell epitopes of myoglobin: effect of I-A/I-E restriction on epitope dominance. J Immunol. 1985 Oct;135(4):2628–2634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berkower I., Matis L. A., Buckenmeyer G. K., Gurd F. R., Longo D. L., Berzofsky J. A. Identification of distinct predominant epitopes recognized by myoglobin-specific T cells under the control of different Ir genes and characterization of representative T cell clones. J Immunol. 1984 Mar;132(3):1370–1378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berzofsky J. A., Buckenmeyer G. K., Hicks G. Genetic control of the immune response to myoglobins. VI. Distinct Ir genes for different myoglobins: complementing genes in I-A and H-2D for equine myoglobin. J Immunol. 1982 Feb;128(2):737–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buus S., Sette A., Colon S. M., Miles C., Grey H. M. The relation between major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction and the capacity of Ia to bind immunogenic peptides. Science. 1987 Mar 13;235(4794):1353–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.2435001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buus S., Werdelin O. A group-specific inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteinases selectively inhibits both proteolytic degradation and presentation of the antigen dinitrophenyl-poly-L-lysine by guinea pig accessory cells to T cells. J Immunol. 1986 Jan;136(2):452–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cease K. B., Berkower I., York-Jolley J., Berzofsky J. A. T cell clones specific for an amphipathic alpha-helical region of sperm whale myoglobin show differing fine specificities for synthetic peptides. A multiview/single structure interpretation of immunodominance. J Exp Med. 1986 Nov 1;164(5):1779–1784. doi: 10.1084/jem.164.5.1779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cease K. B., Margalit H., Cornette J. L., Putney S. D., Robey W. G., Ouyang C., Streicher H. Z., Fischinger P. J., Gallo R. C., DeLisi C. Helper T-cell antigenic site identification in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome virus gp120 envelope protein and induction of immunity in mice to the native protein using a 16-residue synthetic peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4249–4253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Corley L., Sachs D. H., Anfinsen C. B. Rapid solid-phase synthesis of bradykinin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Jun 28;47(6):1353–1359. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90221-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Corradin G., Etlinger H. M., Chiller J. M. Lymphocyte specificity to protein antigens. I. Characterization of the antigen-induced in vitro T cell-dependent proliferative response with lymph node cells from primed mice. J Immunol. 1977 Sep;119(3):1048–1053. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Finnegan A., Smith M. A., Smith J. A., Berzofsky J., Sachs D. H., Hodes R. J. The T cell repertoire for recognition of a phylogenetically distant protein antigen. Peptide specificity and MHC restriction of staphylococcal nuclease-specific T cell clones. J Exp Med. 1986 Sep 1;164(3):897–910. doi: 10.1084/jem.164.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gammon G., Shastri N., Cogswell J., Wilbur S., Sadegh-Nasseri S., Krzych U., Miller A., Sercarz E. The choice of T-cell epitopes utilized on a protein antigen depends on multiple factors distant from, as well as at the determinant site. Immunol Rev. 1987 Aug;98:53–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1987.tb00519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Good M. F., Maloy W. L., Lunde M. N., Margalit H., Cornette J. L., Smith G. L., Moss B., Miller L. H., Berzofsky J. A. Construction of synthetic immunogen: use of new T-helper epitope on malaria circumsporozoite protein. Science. 1987 Feb 27;235(4792):1059–1062. doi: 10.1126/science.2434994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hackett C. J., Dietzschold B., Gerhard W., Ghrist B., Knorr R., Gillessen D., Melchers F. Influenza virus site recognized by a murine helper T cell specific for H1 strains. Localization to a nine amino acid sequence in the hemagglutinin molecule. J Exp Med. 1983 Aug 1;158(2):294–302. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.2.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansburg D., Fairwell T., Schwartz R. H., Appella E. The T lymphocyte response to cytochrome c. IV. Distinguishable sites on a peptide antigen which affect antigenic strength and memory. J Immunol. 1983 Jul;131(1):319–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hapner K. D., Bradshaw R. A., Hartzell C. R., Gurd F. R. Comparison of myoglobins from harbor seal, porpoise, and sperm whale. I. Preparation and characterization. J Biol Chem. 1968 Feb 25;243(4):683–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kapp J. A., Pierce C. W., Schlossman S., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of immune responses in vitro. V. Stimulation of suppressor T cells in nonresponder mice by the terpolymer L-glutamic acid 60-L-alanine 30-L-tyrosine 10 (GAT). J Exp Med. 1974 Sep 1;140(3):648–659. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.3.648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kojima M., Cease K. B., Buckenmeyer G. K., Berzofsky J. A. Limiting dilution comparison of the repertoires of high and low responder MHC-restricted T cells. J Exp Med. 1988 Mar 1;167(3):1100–1113. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.3.1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kovac Z., Schwartz R. H. The molecular basis of the requirement for antigen processing of pigeon cytochrome c prior to T cell activation. J Immunol. 1985 May;134(5):3233–3240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krzych U., Fowler A. V., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Repertoires of T cells directed against a large protein antigen, beta-galactosidase. I. Helper cells have a more restricted specificity repertoire than proliferative cells. J Immunol. 1982 Apr;128(4):1529–1534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Livingstone A. M., Fathman C. G. The structure of T-cell epitopes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1987;5:477–501. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.05.040187.002401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Marshall R. C., Jones W. C., Jr, Vigna R. A., Gurd F. R. Isolation of cyanogen bromide cleavage peptides from myoglobins. Z Naturforsch C. 1974 Jan-Feb;29(1):90–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Matis L. A., Hedrick S. M., Hannum C., Ultee M. E., Lebwohl D., Margoliash E., Solinger A. M., Lerner E. A., Schwartz R. H. The T lymphocyte response to cytochrome C. III. Relationship of the fine specificity of antigen recognition to major histocompatibility complex genotype. J Immunol. 1982 Jun;128(6):2439–2446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Merrifield R. B. Automated synthesis of peptides. Science. 1965 Oct 8;150(3693):178–185. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3693.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Milich D. R., McLachlan A., Moriarty A., Thornton G. B. Immune response to hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBcAg): localization of T cell recognition sites within HBcAg/HBeAg. J Immunol. 1987 Aug 15;139(4):1223–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sette A., Buus S., Colon S., Smith J. A., Miles C., Grey H. M. Structural characteristics of an antigen required for its interaction with Ia and recognition by T cells. 1987 Jul 30-Aug 5Nature. 328(6129):395–399. doi: 10.1038/328395a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shastri N., Gammon G., Horvath S., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. The choice between two distinct T cell determinants within a 23-amino acid region of lysozyme depends on their structural context. J Immunol. 1986 Aug 1;137(3):911–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shastri N., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Amino acid residues distinct from the determinant region can profoundly affect activation of T cell clones by related antigens. J Immunol. 1986 Jan;136(2):371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Streicher H. Z., Berkower I. J., Busch M., Gurd F. R., Berzofsky J. A. Antigen conformation determines processing requirements for T-cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6831–6835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Unanue E. R. Antigen-presenting function of the macrophage. Annu Rev Immunol. 1984;2:395–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.02.040184.002143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES