Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1989 Nov 1;170(5):1609–1625. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.5.1609

Analysis of peptide binding patterns in different major histocompatibility complex/T cell receptor complexes using pigeon cytochrome c-specific T cell hybridomas. Evidence that a single peptide binds major histocompatibility complex in different conformations

PMCID: PMC2189495  PMID: 2553848

Abstract

The interaction of TCR, antigen, and MHC complex has been analyzed using synthetic peptide antigens and a series of single amino acid- substituted analogues. Two similar antigens, mouse cytochrome c (mcyt c) and pigeon cytochrome c (pcyt c), elicit T cell responses in strains of mice bearing MHC class II Ek beta Ek alpha (B10.A), Eb beta Ek alpha [B10.A(5R)], and Es beta Ek alpha [B10.S(9R)]. The immunogenic regions of these antigens are located in the peptide sequence p88-104 for pcyt c and m88-103 for mcyt c. The limited T cell repertoire for these antigens is comprised of four groups of T cell phenotypes that have very few differences in their TCR gene make up. In this paper, we examine the diversity in their fine specificity for each of the antigens, m88-103 and p88-104, complexed with each of the I-Ek haplotypes. Epitopes, i.e., residues that interact with the TCR, and agretopes, i.e., residues in the MHC-binding site, were assigned for the two peptide antigens in the presence of APC bearing E beta kEk alpha, Eb beta Ek alpha, or Eb beta Ek alpha using T cell hybridomas of the phenotypes I, IIIa, and IV. From our results, we conclude that first, the substitution of any residue between 95 and 104 of the cytochrome c peptide changed the antigenic potency of the peptide for at least one of the hybridomas. Second, each T cell type has a different recognition pattern of epitopes and agretopes for a particular antigen-MHC complex, thus, ruling out a static model of T cell recognition, which assigns certain, invariant agretopic residues to the peptide by which it interacts with the MHC molecule independently of the TCR. Third, the same T cell hybridoma responded to the antigens differently when presented on various MHC molecules, implying that overall changes in the MHC groove, as displayed by the three haplotypes, may affect the efficiency in binding the peptide. Fourth, since most of the residues are used as epitopes by at least one of the T cell specificities, the peptide appears to be recognized in a different conformation by each T cell hybridoma phenotype; and, finally, the epitopic and agretopic residues do not segregate, for any one of the T cell specificities, in such a way that suggests they are recognized in a helical conformation. In summary, our results suggest that a single peptide may generate diversity in the T cell response by virtue of its conformational flexibility within the TCR-MHC-antigen complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (919.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen P. M., Matsueda G. R., Evans R. J., Dunbar J. B., Jr, Marshall G. R., Unanue E. R. Identification of the T-cell and Ia contact residues of a T-cell antigenic epitope. 1987 Jun 25-Jul 1Nature. 327(6124):713–715. doi: 10.1038/327713a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen P. M., McKean D. J., Beck B. N., Sheffield J., Glimcher L. H. Direct evidence that a class II molecule and a simple globular protein generate multiple determinants. J Exp Med. 1985 Oct 1;162(4):1264–1274. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.4.1264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashwell J. D., Fox B. S., Schwartz R. H. Functional analysis of the interaction of the antigen-specific T cell receptor with its ligands. J Immunol. 1986 Feb 1;136(3):757–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashwell J. D., Schwartz R. H. T-cell recognition of antigen and the Ia molecule as a ternary complex. Nature. 1986 Mar 13;320(6058):176–179. doi: 10.1038/320176a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Babbitt B. P., Matsueda G., Haber E., Unanue E. R., Allen P. M. Antigenic competition at the level of peptide-Ia binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(12):4509–4513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berkower I., Buckenmeyer G. K., Berzofsky J. A. Molecular mapping of a histocompatibility-restricted immunodominant T cell epitope with synthetic and natural peptides: implications for T cell antigenic structure. J Immunol. 1986 Apr 1;136(7):2498–2503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berkower I., Matis L. A., Buckenmeyer G. K., Gurd F. R., Longo D. L., Berzofsky J. A. Identification of distinct predominant epitopes recognized by myoglobin-specific T cells under the control of different Ir genes and characterization of representative T cell clones. J Immunol. 1984 Mar;132(3):1370–1378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berzofsky J. A., Cease K. B., Cornette J. L., Spouge J. L., Margalit H., Berkower I. J., Good M. F., Miller L. H., DeLisi C. Protein antigenic structures recognized by T cells: potential applications to vaccine design. Immunol Rev. 1987 Aug;98:9–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1987.tb00518.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhayani H., Carbone F. R., Paterson Y. The activation of pigeon cytochrome c-specific T cell hybridomas by antigenic peptides is influenced by non-native sequences at the amino terminus of the determinant. J Immunol. 1988 Jul 15;141(2):377–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buus S., Sette A., Colon S. M., Miles C., Grey H. M. The relation between major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction and the capacity of Ia to bind immunogenic peptides. Science. 1987 Mar 13;235(4794):1353–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.2435001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carbone F. R., Fox B. S., Schwartz R. H., Paterson Y. The use of hydrophobic, alpha-helix-defined peptides in delineating the T cell determinant for pigeon cytochrome c. J Immunol. 1987 Mar 15;138(6):1838–1844. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carbone F. R., Staerz U. D., Paterson Y. A new T helper cell specificity within the pigeon cytochrome c determinant 95-104. Eur J Immunol. 1987 Jun;17(6):897–899. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830170626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cease K. B., Berkower I., York-Jolley J., Berzofsky J. A. T cell clones specific for an amphipathic alpha-helical region of sperm whale myoglobin show differing fine specificities for synthetic peptides. A multiview/single structure interpretation of immunodominance. J Exp Med. 1986 Nov 1;164(5):1779–1784. doi: 10.1084/jem.164.5.1779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeLisi C., Berzofsky J. A. T-cell antigenic sites tend to be amphipathic structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(20):7048–7052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.20.7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fink P. J., Matis L. A., McElligott D. L., Bookman M., Hedrick S. M. Correlations between T-cell specificity and the structure of the antigen receptor. Nature. 1986 May 15;321(6067):219–226. doi: 10.1038/321219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox B. S., Chen C., Fraga E., French C. A., Singh B., Schwartz R. H. Functionally distinct agretopic and epitopic sites. Analysis of the dominant T cell determinant of moth and pigeon cytochromes c with the use of synthetic peptide antigens. J Immunol. 1987 Sep 1;139(5):1578–1588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillis S., Ferm M. M., Ou W., Smith K. A. T cell growth factor: parameters of production and a quantitative microassay for activity. J Immunol. 1978 Jun;120(6):2027–2032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gillis S., Smith K. A. Long term culture of tumour-specific cytotoxic T cells. Nature. 1977 Jul 14;268(5616):154–156. doi: 10.1038/268154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guillet J. G., Lai M. Z., Briner T. J., Smith J. A., Gefter M. L. Interaction of peptide antigens and class II major histocompatibility complex antigens. Nature. 1986 Nov 20;324(6094):260–262. doi: 10.1038/324260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heber-Katz E., Hansburg D., Schwartz R. H. The Ia molecule of the antigen-presenting cell plays a critical role in immune response gene regulation of T cell activation. J Mol Cell Immunol. 1983;1(1):3–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hedrick S. M., Matis L. A., Hecht T. T., Samelson L. E., Longo D. L., Heber-Katz E., Schwartz R. H. The fine specificity of antigen and Ia determinant recognition by T cell hybridoma clones specific for pigeon cytochrome c. Cell. 1982 Aug;30(1):141–152. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kurisaki J., Atassi H., Atassi M. Z. T cell recognition of ragweed allergen Ra3: localization of the full T cell recognition profile by synthetic overlapping peptides representing the entire protein chain. Eur J Immunol. 1986 Mar;16(3):236–240. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830160305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lai M. Z., Ross D. T., Guillet J. G., Briner T. J., Gefter M. L., Smith J. A. T lymphocyte response to bacteriophage lambda repressor cI protein. Recognition of the same peptide presented by Ia molecules of different haplotypes. J Immunol. 1987 Dec 15;139(12):3973–3980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Plachov D., Fischer H. G., Reske-Kunz A. B., Rüde E. The specificity of the interaction between the agretope of an antigen and an Ia-molecule can depend on the T cell clonotype. Mol Immunol. 1988 Jul;25(7):611–620. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(88)90096-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ronchese F., Schwartz R. H., Germain R. N. Functionally distinct subsites on a class II major histocompatibility complex molecule. Nature. 1987 Sep 17;329(6136):254–256. doi: 10.1038/329254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Samelson L. E., Germain R. N., Schwartz R. H. Monoclonal antibodies against the antigen receptor on a cloned T-cell hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Nov;80(22):6972–6976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.22.6972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schwartz R. H., Fox B. S., Fraga E., Chen C., Singh B. The T lymphocyte response to cytochrome c. V. Determination of the minimal peptide size required for stimulation of T cell clones and assessment of the contribution of each residue beyond this size to antigenic potency. J Immunol. 1985 Oct;135(4):2598–2608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schwartz R. H. T-lymphocyte recognition of antigen in association with gene products of the major histocompatibility complex. Annu Rev Immunol. 1985;3:237–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.03.040185.001321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sette A., Buus S., Colon S., Smith J. A., Miles C., Grey H. M. Structural characteristics of an antigen required for its interaction with Ia and recognition by T cells. 1987 Jul 30-Aug 5Nature. 328(6129):395–399. doi: 10.1038/328395a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sorger S. B., Hedrick S. M., Fink P. J., Bookman M. A., Matis L. A. Generation of diversity in T cell receptor repertoire specific for pigeon cytochrome c. J Exp Med. 1987 Feb 1;165(2):279–301. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Watts T. H., Gaub H. E., McConnell H. M. T-cell-mediated association of peptide antigen and major histocompatibility complex protein detected by energy transfer in an evanescent wave-field. Nature. 1986 Mar 13;320(6058):179–181. doi: 10.1038/320179a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES