Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1975 May 1;141(5):1057–1072. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.5.1057

Genetic control of immune response. The dose of antigen given in aqueous solution is critical in determining which mouse strain is high responder to poly(LTyr, LGlu)-poly(LPro)--poly(LLys)

PMCID: PMC2189793  PMID: 47893

Abstract

Antibody response to different doses of (T,G)-Pro--L, given in aqueous solution, was investigated in the high responder SJL and low responder DBA/1 strains by measuring hemolytic plaque-forming cells (PFC) in the spleens as well as hemagglutination titers in the sera. The gene responsible for the difference between the two strains in the response to this antigen, given in complete Freund's adjuvant, has been previously denoted Ir-3. This gene is not linked to the major histocompatibility locus. In the response to the optimal dose (1 mug) of antigen, no difference could be shown between the strains. The peak of the response and the numbers of direct and indirect PFC were similar in both strains in the primary and secondary response. After injection of higher doses (10-100 mug) of antigen, both the direct and indirect PFC responses were lower in the low responder than in the high responder strain. Moreover, the peak of the response occurred earlier in the high responder strain in the primary response to the 10 mu dose of antigen. After administration of a suboptimal dose (0.02 mug) of antigen, the low responder strain produced in the primary response 4-20 times more indirect plaques than the high responder strain. Also the number of direct plaques was higher in the low responder than in the high responder strain. The serum antibody responses to the optimal and higher doses of antigen were parallel to the PFC responses. From inhibition of PFC with free antigen, it was concluded that a similar proportion of cells was producing high and low affinity antibodies to (T,G)-Pro--L in both strains. High and low zone tolerance could be induced in the two strains with (T,G)-Pro--L, but no difference could be shown between the strains. It is suggested that the Ir-3 gene plays a role in the regulation of the balance stimulation and suppression according to the dose of antigen given.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (942.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amsbaugh D. F., Hansen C. T., Prescott B., Stashak P. W., Barthold D. R., Baker P. J. Genetic control of the antibody response to type 3 pneumococcal polysaccharide in mice. I. Evidence that an X-linked gene plays a decisive role in determining responsiveness. J Exp Med. 1972 Oct 1;136(4):931–949. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.4.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benacerraf B., McDevitt H. O. Histocompatibility-linked immune response genes. Science. 1972 Jan 21;175(4019):273–279. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4019.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blomberg B., Geckeler W. R., Weigert M. Genetics of the antibody response to dextran in mice. Science. 1972 Jul 14;177(4044):178–180. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4044.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonavida B., Mozes E., Shearer G. M., Sela M. Immunological unresponsiveness induced in adult mice to synthetic polypeptides built on multichain polyproline and multichain polyalanine. Immunochemistry. 1974 Jul;11(7):347–353. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(74)90187-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun D. G., Eichmann K., Krause R. M. Rabbit antibodies to streptococcal carbohydrates. Influence of primary and secondary immunization and of possible genetic factors on the antibody response. J Exp Med. 1969 Apr 1;129(4):809–830. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.4.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davie J. M., Paul W. E., Green I. Genetic control of the immune response of inbred guinea pigs to 2,4-dinitrophenyl guinea pig albumin. Frequency of antigen-binding lymphocytes and avidity of antibodies secreted by plaque-forming cells. J Immunol. 1972 Aug;109(2):193–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dorf M. E., Dunham E. K., Johnson J. P., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of the immune response: the effect of non-H-2 linked genes on antibody production. J Immunol. 1974 Apr;112(4):1329–1336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eichmann K., Braun D. G., Krause R. M. Influence of genetic factors on the magnitude and the heterogeneity of the immune response in the rabbit. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):48–65. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eichmann K., Kindt T. J. The inheritance of individual antigenic specificities of rabbit antibodies to streptococcal carbohydrates. J Exp Med. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):532–552. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Falkenberg F. W., Sulica A., Shearer G. M., Mozes E., Sela M. Cellular analysis of the phenotypic correction of the genetically controlled low immune response to the polyproline determinant by macrophages. Cell Immunol. 1974 May;12(2):271–279. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gasser D. L., Silvers W. K. Genetic determinants of immunological responsiveness. Adv Immunol. 1974;18:1–66. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60307-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Infectious immunological tolerance. Immunology. 1971 Dec;21(6):903–914. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Green I., Inman J. K., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of the immune response of guinea pigs to limiting doses of bovine serum albumin: relationship to the poly-L-lysine gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Aug;66(4):1267–1274. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.4.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grumet F. C. Genetic control of the immune response. A selective defect in immunologic (IgG) memory in nonresponder mice. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):110–125. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ha T. Y., Waksman B. H., Treffers H. P. The thymic suppressor cell. I. Separation of subpopulations with suppressor activity. J Exp Med. 1974 Jan 1;139(1):13–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaton J. C., Sela M. Role of optical configuration in the immunogenicity and specificity of synthetic antigens derived from multichain polyproline. J Biol Chem. 1968 Nov 10;243(21):5616–5626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Dorf M. E., Maurer P. H., Benacerraf B. Cell interactions between histoincompatible T and B lymphocytes. IV. Involvement of the immune response (Ir) gene in the control of lymphocyte interactions in responses controlled by the gene. J Exp Med. 1973 Sep 1;138(3):734–739. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.3.734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klein G., Pearson G., Rabson A., Ablashi D. V., Falk L., Wolfe L., Dienhardt F., Rabin H. Antibody reactions to herpesvirus saimiri (HVS)-induced early and late antigens (EA and LA) in HVS-infected squirrel, marmoset and owl monkeys. Int J Cancer. 1973 Jul 15;12(1):270–289. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910120128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lichtenberg L., Mozes E., Shearer G. M., Sela M. The role of thymus cells in the immune response to poly(Tyr, Glu)-polyD L Ala--polyLys as a function of the genetic constitution of the mouse strain. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jun;4(6):430–434. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McDevitt H. O., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of specific immune responses. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:31–74. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McDevitt H. O., Chinitz A. Genetic control of the antibody response: relationship between immune response and histocompatibility (H-2) type. Science. 1969 Mar 14;163(3872):1207–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3872.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the antibody response. 3. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of the antibody response to (T,G)-A--L in CBA and C57 mice. J Immunol. 1968 Mar;100(3):485–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McDevitt H. O., Sela M. Genetic control of the antibody response. I. Demonstration of determinant-specific differences in response to synthetic polypeptide antigens in two strains of inbred mice. J Exp Med. 1965 Sep 1;122(3):517–531. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McDevitt H. O., Tyan M. L. Genetic control of the antibody response in inbred mice. Transfer of response by spleen cells and linkage to the major histocompatibility (H-2) locus. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mozes E., Fuchs S. Linkage between immune response potential to DNA and X chromosome. Nature. 1974 May 10;249(453):167–168. doi: 10.1038/249167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The genetic control of antibody specificity. J Exp Med. 1969 Dec 1;130(6):1263–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.6.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The nature of the antigenic determinant in a genetic control of the antibody response. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):493–504. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mozes E., Shaltiel S., Sela M. The genetic control of the immune response to different antigenic determinants within the synthetic polypeptide poly(His, Glu)-polyPro-polyLys. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jul;4(7):463–467. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mozes E., Shearer G. M. Contribution of bone marrow cells and lack of expression of thymocytes in genetic controls of immune responses for two immunopotent regions within poly-(Phe,Glu)-poly-Pro--poly-Lys in inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):141–161. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mozes E., Shearer G. M. Genetic control of immune responses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1972;59:167–200. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-65444-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mozes E., Shearer G. M., Sela M., Braun W. Genetic control of immune responses to synthetic polypeptides in mice: cellular analysis of the phenotypic correction of the Ir-3 gene defect by polyadenylic-polyuridylic acid. J Immunol. 1973 Aug;111(2):439–447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mäkelä O. Analogies between lymphocyte receptors and the resulting humoral antibodies. Transplant Rev. 1970;5:3–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. SELA M., FUCHS S., ARNON R. Studies on the chemical basis of the antigenicity of proteins. 5. Synthesis, characterization and immunogenicity of some multichain and linear polypeptides containing tyrosine. Biochem J. 1962 Oct;85:223–235. doi: 10.1042/bj0850223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Scher I., Frantz M. M., Steinberg A. D. The genetics of the immune response to a synthetic double-stranded RNA in a mutant CBA mouse strain. J Immunol. 1973 May;110(5):1396–1401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sela M. Antigenicity: some molecular aspects. Science. 1969 Dec 12;166(3911):1365–1374. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3911.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sela M., Fuchs S., Maron R., Gertner B. Dose response and induction of tolerance to the synthetic antigen (T,G)-A-L in adult rabbits. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):36–39. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shearer G. M., Mozes E., Sela M. Contribution of different cell types to the genetic control of immune responses as a function of the chemical nature of the polymeric side chains (poly-L-prolyl and poly-DL-alanyl) of synthetic immunogens. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1009–1027. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sher A., Cohn M. Inheritance of an idiotype associated with the immune response of inbred mice to phosphorylcholine. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Aug;2(4):319–326. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tada T., Takemori T. Selective roles of thymus-derived lymphocytes in the antibody response. I. Differential suppressive effect of carrier-primed T cells on hapten-specific IgM and IgG antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):239–252. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Taussig J., Mozes E., Isac R. Antigen-specific thymus cell factors in the genetic control of the immune response to poly-(tyrosyl, glutamyl)-poly-D, L-alanyl--poly-lysyl. J Exp Med. 1974 Aug 1;140(2):301–312. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.2.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vaz N. M., Vaz E. M., Levine B. B. Relationship between histocompatibility (H-2) genotype and immune responsiveness to low doses of ovalbumin in the mouse. J Immunol. 1970 Jun;104(6):1572–1574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vyas G. N., Fudenberg H. H., Pretty H. M., Gold E. R. A new rapid method for genetic typing of human immunoglobulins. J Immunol. 1968 Feb;100(2):274–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES