Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2007 May 29;151(8):1141–1142. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707287

Neuroprotection with or without erythropoiesis; sometimes less is more

L Torup 1,*
PMCID: PMC2189815  PMID: 17533424

Abstract

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a pleiotropic cytokine with a therapeutic potential that goes well beyond the treatment of anaemia. The study by Wang et al (2007b) examined the protective effects of EPO in a rat model of embolic stroke. The efficacy and haematological side effects of EPO were compared to those of a carbamylated EPO variant (CEPO). Treatment with EPO dose-dependently reduced infarct volume and improved long-term functional outcome. However, an increase in hematocrit was seen even for doses of EPO that did not offer neuroprotection. These data do not suggest the existence of a therapeutic window between effect and side effect for treatment with EPO. Treatment with CEPO was without haematological side effects.

Keywords: stroke, MCAO, EPO, CEPO


Erythropoietin (EPO) is the primary stimulator of red blood cell formation. The human gene for this important hormone was cloned in 1983 and human recombinant EPO is now a standard treatment for anaemia due to kidney failure or cancer chemotherapy. In the 1990s, it was found that astrocytes produced EPO and neurons express the EPO receptor (EPO-R). This suggested that EPO had a paracrine and/or autocrine function in the brain (Masuda et al., 1993, 1994; Digicaylioglu et al., 1995). Indeed, EPO protected hippocampal and cortical neurons from glutamate-induced cell death in vitro (Morishita et al., 1996) and from global ischaemia in gerbils in vivo (Sakanaka et al., 1998). As infusion of EPO-neutralizing, soluble EPO-R into the ventricles increased stroke lesions, it appeared that brain EPO was an endogenous counter-regulator of ischaemic damage (Sakanaka et al., 1998).

Since these pivotal findings in the 1990s, this research field has exploded and EPO is now widely recognized as a pleiotropic cytokine with a therapeutic potential that goes beyond treatment of anaemia (Brines et al., 2000; Siren et al., 2001; Villa et al., 2003; Lu et al., 2005; Tsai et al., 2006). The first clinical trial testing the efficacy of EPO in stroke patients was conducted by Ehrenreich et al. (2002), which showed a significant functional and neurological improvement after three doses of 33 000 IU rhEPO over 3 days. Although EPO treatment is widely accepted as a safe treatment for anaemic patients, concerns have been raised with respect to the treatment of a non-anaemic patient population with the blood-forming hormone. For instance, a breast cancer trial on the efficacy of rhEPO on cancer-related fatigue in patients with mild anaemia was prematurely terminated because of thrombotic events (Rosenzweig et al., 2004). Given that post-stroke patients are at high risk of re-thrombosis (Coull and Rothwell, 2004), it would be desirable to develop compounds retaining EPO's neuroprotective properties, but without any haematological side effects. One such compound is carbamylated EPO (CEPO), which does not interact or signal through the classical EPO-R nor does it alter any haematological parameters even after chronic dosing (Leist et al., 2004). Both EPO and CEPO have been shown to have a long-lasting effect on functional recovery after stroke in rats with a remarkable time window for the onset of treatment after initiation of the lesion of at least 24 h (Wang et al., 2004; Villa et al., 2007).

In the current issue of British Journal of Pharmacology, Wang et al. (2007b) present a head-to-head comparison of the protective effect of EPO and CEPO in a rat model of stroke following embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). EPO at dose levels of 500–5000 IU kg−1 (corresponding to 4.2–42 μg kg−1) or CEPO at a dose level of 50 μg kg−1 significantly reduced infarct volume and improved functional outcome when administered 6, 24 and 48 h after embolic MCAO. A dose of 50 μg kg−1 EPO reduced the infarct volume by 28%, but this dose was also high enough to produce an increase in haematocrit compared to the vehicle-treated group. Lower doses of EPO (500 IU kg−1) with less effect on the haematocrit resulted also in significantly lower neuroprotection (mean reduction of 17%). These data suggest that there is no therapeutic window for EPO between the dose needed for neuroprotective effects and the dose-inducing haematological side effects. In contrast to this, CEPO (at 50 μg kg−1) offered the same neuroprotection as 5000 IU kg−1 of EPO, but without any haematological side effects.

EPO and CEPO have previously been reported to cross the blood–brain barrier after intravenous administration. The present study shows for the first time the brain levels of EPO and CEPO after a stroke lesion. One might have expected that more cytokine would have entered the brain parenchyma in the ipsilateral (damaged) hemisphere, but no difference in cytokine levels was seen between the ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres. This might be explained by the experimental set-up where the brain is flushed with buffer before assay of EPO and this procedure might flush out cytokine preferentially in the ipsilateral hemisphere where there was damaged endothelium, induced by the lesion.

With the discontinuation of the NXY-059 drug development programme by Astra Zeneca as the most recent setback in the stroke field, new avenues need urgently to be explored. Combination therapy or multimodal drugs targeting different stages of the pathophysiological cascade after stroke have been suggested as an alternative approach. EPO and EPO derivatives have been proposed as having multiple modes of action including acute anti-apoptotic effects and facilitation of functional recovery through stimulation of neurogenesis and angiogenesis (Wang et al., 2004, 2007a; Tsai et al., 2006; Villa et al., 2007). The remarkably long time window in rat stroke models suggests that EPO and CEPO could indeed be a way forward for the future treatment of stroke. Further development of this concept will reveal whether these encouraging animal data can be translated into efficacy in the clinic.

Abbreviations

CEPO

carbamylated erythropoietin

EPO

erythropoietin

EPO-R

erythropoietin receptor

IU

international units

MCAO

middle cerebral artery occlusion

References

  1. Brines ML, Ghezzi P, Keenan S, Agnello D, de Lanerolle NC, Cerami C, et al. Erythropoietin crosses the blood–brain barrier to protect against experimental brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10526–10531. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coull AJ, Rothwell PM. Underestimation of the early risk of recurrent stroke: evidence of the need for a standard definition. Stroke. 2004;35:1925–1929. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000133129.58126.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Digicaylioglu M, Bichet S, Marti HH, Wenger RH, Rivas LA, Bauer C, et al. Localization of specific erythropoietin binding sites in defined areas of the mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3717–3720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehrenreich H, Hasselblatt M, Dembowski C, Cepek L, Lewczuk P, Stiefel M, et al. Erythropoietin therapy for acute stroke is both safe and beneficial. Mol Med. 2002;8:495–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leist M, Ghezzi P, Grasso G, Bianchi R, Villa P, Fratelli M, et al. Derivatives of erythropoietin that are tissue protective but not erythropoietic. Science. 2004;305:239–242. doi: 10.1126/science.1098313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu D, Mahmood A, Qu C, Goussev A, Schallert T, Chopp M. Erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and restores spatial memory in rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:1011–1017. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Masuda S, Nagao M, Takahata K, Konishi Y, Gallyas F, Jr, Tabira T, et al. Functional erythropoietin receptor of the cells with neural characteristics Comparison with receptor properties of erythroid cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:11208–11216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Masuda S, Okano M, Yamagishi K, Nagao M, Ueda M, Sasaki R. A novel site of erythropoietin production Oxygen-dependent production in cultured rat astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:19488–19493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morishita E, Masuda S, Nagao M, Yasuda Y, Sasaki R. Erythropoietin receptor is expressed in rat hippocampal and cerebral cortical neurons, and erythropoietin prevents in vitro glutamate-induced neuronal death. Neuroscience. 1996;76:105–116. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenzweig M, Bender C, Lucke J, Yasko J, Brufsky A. The decision to prematurely terminate a trial of R-HuEPO due to thrombotic events. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;27:185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sakanaka M, Wen TC, Matsuda S, Masuda S, Morishita E, Nagao M, et al. In vivo evidence that erythropoietin protects neurons from ischemic damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4635–4640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Siren AL, Fratelli M, Brines M, Goemans C, Casagrande S, Lewczuk P, et al. Erythropoietin prevents neuronal apoptosis after cerebral ischemia and metabolic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4044–4049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051606598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsai PT, Ohab JJ, Kertesz N, Groszer M, Matter C, Gao J, et al. A critical role of erythropoietin receptor in neurogenesis and post-stroke recovery. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1269–1274. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4480-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Villa P, Bigini P, Mennini T, Agnello D, Laragione T, Cagnotto A, et al. Erythropoietin selectively attenuates cytokine production and inflammation in cerebral ischemia by targeting neuronal apoptosis. J Exp Med. 2003;198:971–975. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Villa P, Van Beek J, Larsen A, Gerwien J, Christensen S, Cerami A, et al. Reduced functional deficits, neuroinflammation, and secondary tissue damage after treatment of stroke by nonerythropoietic erythropoietin derivatives. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:552–563. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang L, Zhang Z, Gregg SR, Zhang R, Jiao Z, Le Tourneau Y, et al. The Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Mediates Carbamylated EPO Enhanced Proliferation and Differentiation of Adult Neural Progenitor Cells. International Stroke Conference Abstract. 2007a. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Wang L, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhang R, Chopp M. Treatment of stroke with erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis and improves neurological function in rats. Stroke. 2004;35:1732–1737. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000132196.49028.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang Y, Zhang Z, Rhodes K, Renzi M, Zhang RL, Kapke A, et al. Postischemic treatment with erythropoietin or carbamylated erythropoietin reduces infarction and improves neurological outcome in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia Br J Pharmacol 2007b1511377–1384.this issue [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES