Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1975 Jun 1;141(6):1238–1248. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.6.1238

Rubella cataract in vitro: Sensitive period of the developing human lens

PMCID: PMC2189850  PMID: 1092795

Abstract

The clinically known sensitive period of rubella cataract was studied in vitro by infecting 79 human eye rudiments from embryos aged 4-10 wk with rubella virus. The course of the infection was followed by histological and indirect immunofluorescence methods. Of the rudiments, 12 pairs were in the lens placode or open-lens-vesicle stage, 40 already had closed lens vesicles and in another 27 closed-stage pairs an incision was made in the lens capsule before infection to allow the virus to enter the lens. Uninfected controls differentiated well in vitro for 4-6 wk. The eye rudiments infected in the open-lens-vesicle stage showed lens fiber destruction and viral antigens within the lens. No damage or viral antigens were detected in rudiments infected in the closed stage unless the lens capsule was incisedmwhen this was done, however, fiber damage ensued and viral antigens appeared. The lens capsule was concluded to form a protective barrier around the sensirive fibers at the time of closure of the lens vesicle, confirming the earlier hypothesis and clinical findings.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (906.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alestig K., Bartsch F. K., Nilsson L. A., Strannegard O. Notes. Studies of amniotic fluid in women infected with rubella. J Infect Dis. 1974 Jan;129(1):79–81. doi: 10.1093/infdis/129.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellanti J. A., Artenstein M. S., Olson L. C., Buescher E. L., Luhrs C. E., Milstead K. L. Congenital rubella. Clinicopathologic, virologic, and immunologic studies. Am J Dis Child. 1965 Oct;110(4):464–472. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090030484020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Best J. M., Banatvala J. E., Moore B. M. Growth of rubella virus in human embryonic organ cultures. J Hyg (Lond) 1968 Sep;66(3):407–413. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400041279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Best J. M., Banatvala J. E., Smith M. E. Further studies on the growth of rubella virus in human embryonic organ cultures: preliminary observations on interferon production in these cultures. J Hyg (Lond) 1971 Jun;69(2):223–232. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400021458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Catalano L. W., Jr, Sever J. L. The role of viruses as causes of congenital diseases. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1971;25:255–282. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.001351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cotlier E., Fox J., Smith M. Rubella virus in the cataractous lens of congenital rubella syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Aug;62(2):233–235. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)91476-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. EBERT J. D., WILT F. H. Animal viruses and embryos. Q Rev Biol. 1960 Dec;35:261–312. doi: 10.1086/403189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elizan T. S., Fabiyi A., Sever J. L. Study of rubella virus as a teratogen in experimental animals: a short review. J Mt Sinai Hosp N Y. 1969 Mar-Apr;36(2):108–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karkinen-Jäskeläinen Spatial and temporal restriction of mumps virus induced lesions in the developing chick lens. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1973;(Suppl):1–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MACMILLAN M. G., REID C. M., SHIRLING D., PASSMORE R. BODY COMPOSITION, RESTING OXYGEN CONSUMPTION, AND URINARY CREATININE IN EDINBURGH STUDENTS. Lancet. 1965 Apr 3;1(7388):728–729. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)92088-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MAYES B. Rubella and the unborn. Triangle. 1957 Mar;3(1):10–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MCCARTHY K., TAYLOR-ROBINSON C. H. GROWTH AND CYTOPATHIC EFFECTS OF RUBELLA VIRUS IN PRIMARY RABBIT TISSUE CULTURE. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1965;16:415–418. doi: 10.1007/BF01253848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MCCARTHY K., TAYLOR-ROBINSON C. H., PILLINGER S. E. ISOLATION OF RUBELLA VIRUS FROM CASES IN BRITAIN. Lancet. 1963 Sep 21;2(7308):593–598. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)90393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MONIF G. R., SEVER J. L., SCHIFF G. M., TRAUB R. G. ISOLATION OF RUBELLA VIRUS FROM PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1965 Apr 15;91:1143–1146. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(65)90714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Modak S. P., Perdue S. W. Terminal lens cell differentiation. I. Histological and microspectrophotometric analysis of nuclear degeneration. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jan;59(1):43–56. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90622-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Plotkin S. A., Cornfeld D., Ingalls T. H. Studies of immunization with living rubella virus. Trials in children with a strain cultured from an aborted fetus. Am J Dis Child. 1965 Oct;110(4):381–389. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090030401007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Plotkin S. A., Vaheri A. Human fibroblasts infected with rubella virus produce a growth inhibitor. Science. 1967 May 5;156(3775):659–661. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3775.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. ROBERTSON G. G., WILLIAMSON A. P., BLATTNER R. J. ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF LENS CATARACTS IN MUMPS-INFECTED CHICK EMBRYOS. Am J Anat. 1964 Nov;115:473–485. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001150305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reid R. R., Murphy A. M. Isolation of rubella virus from congenital cataracts removed at operation. Med J Aust. 1966 Mar 26;1(13):540–542. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1966.tb72577.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SELZER G. VIRUS ISOLATION, INCLUSION BODIES, AND CHROMOSOMES IN A RUBELLA-INFECTED HUMAN EMBRYO. Lancet. 1963 Aug 17;2(7303):336–337. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)92998-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saxén L., Koskimies O., Lahti A., Miettinen H., Rapola J., Wartiovaara J. Differentiation of kidney mesenchyme in an experimental model system. Adv Morphog. 1968;7:251–293. doi: 10.1016/b978-1-4831-9954-2.50011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stewart G. L., Parkman P. D., Hopps H. E., Douglas R. D., Hamilton J. P., Meyer H. M., Jr Rubella-virus hemagglutination-inhibition test. N Engl J Med. 1967 Mar 9;276(10):554–557. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196703092761006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vaheri A., Sedwick W. D., Plotkin S. A., Maes R. Cytopathic effect of rubella virus in RHK21 cells and growth to high titers in suspension culture. Virology. 1965 Oct;27(2):239–241. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(65)90170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vaheri A., von Bonsdorff C. H., Vesikari T., Hovi T., Vänänen P. Purification of rubella virus particles. J Gen Virol. 1969 Jul;5(1):39–46. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-5-1-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Virtanen I., Karkinen-Jäskeläinen, Saxén L. Ultrastructural characteristics of mumps virus replication in the cataracts of chick embryonic lens. Exp Eye Res. 1973 Dec 10;17(5):463–472. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(73)90227-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. WILLIAMSON A. P., BLATTNER R. J., SIMONSEN L. Cataracts following mumps virus in early chick embryos. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957 Oct;96(1):224–228. doi: 10.3181/00379727-96-23437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Woods W. A., Johnson R. T., Hostetler D. D., Lepow M. L., Robbins F. C. Immunofluorescent studies on rubella-infected tissue cultures and human tissues. J Immunol. 1966 Feb;96(2):253–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zimmerman L. E. Histopathologic basis for ocular manifestations of congenital rubella syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968 Jun;65(6):837–862. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)92210-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES