Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1180–1199. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1180

Identification and characterization of the monoblast in mononuclear phagocyte colonies grown in vitro

PMCID: PMC2189966  PMID: 1104740

Abstract

A liquid culture technique for growing mononuclear phagocyte colonies on a glass surface is described. This useful and reliable technique made it possible to study immature mononuclear phagocytes. In the mononuclear phagocyte colonies the cells grow separate from each other in a single layer. Three types of cells are recognized in these colonies, namely nondividing macrophages, and proliferating promonocytes and monoblasts. The macrophage and the promonocyte exhibit the typical characteristics previously demonstrated by the other methods, whereas the monoblast could only be fully characterized by the present liquid culture method. This proliferating cell (labeling index with [3H]thymidine, 92-96%) is almost round (diameters, 10 X 10 mum), has only a small rim of strongly basophilic cytoplasm, almost devoid of granules, and shows a certain degree of ruffling of the cell surface. The monoblast is positive for esterase with alpha-naphthyl butyrate as substrate (91%), for peroxidase (78% in the peroxidase-positive colonies), and lysozyme (43%). The monoblast is able to pinocytize dextran sulphate (15-20%) and to phagocytize opsonized bacteria (20- 30%), latex particles (47%), and IgG-coated red cells (96%). IgG receptors (94%) and complement receptors (16%) are present at the cell surface. In these respects the monoblast has the typical characteristics of the mononuclear phagocytes, but its properties show it to be a more immature cell type than the promonocyte. On the basis of these criteria and the sequence of appearance of the different cell types during incubation and during the development of the individual mononuclear phagocyte colony, monoblasts being present before promonocytes appear in the colony, it is concluded that the monoblast is the precursor of the promonocyte. In these cultures granulocyte colonies are also formed, consisting of myeloblasts, (pro)myelocytes, stabs, and polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Besides the typically tight structure of this kind of colony, the granulocytic cells themselves are quite distinct from the mononuclear phagocytes by their morphology, cytochemical characteristics (e.g. all negative for esterase with alpha- naphthyl butyrate, but 96% positive with N-acetyl DL-alanyl 1- naphthylester), functional characteristics (pinocytic index 13-21%; phagocytic index; for opsonized bacteria 15-36%, for latex particles 10%, and for IgG-coated red cells 0%), and their very small number of IgG receptors and lack of complement receptors. On the basis of these criteria, these granulocytic cells are easily distinguished from the immature cells of the mononuclear phagocyte colonies. The present study confirms the conclusion that the mononuclear phagocytes are a separate cell line, quite distinct from the granulocytic series, since even the most immature cells so far identified--the monoblast and the myeloblast- -have quite different characteristics.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BALNER H. Identification of peritoneal macrophages in mouse radiation chimeras. Transplantation. 1963 Apr;1:217–223. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196301020-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley T. R., Metcalf D. The growth of mouse bone marrow cells in vitro. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1966 Jun;44(3):287–299. doi: 10.1038/icb.1966.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COHN Z. A., BENSON B. THE DIFFERENTIATION OF MONONUCLEAR PHAGOCYTES. MORPHOLOGY, CYTOCHEMISTRY, AND BIOCHEMISTRY. J Exp Med. 1965 Jan 1;121:153–170. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cline M. J., Sumner M. A. Bone marrow macrophage precursors. I. Some functional characteristics of the early cells of the mouse macrophage series. Blood. 1972 Jul;40(1):62–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohn Z. A., Parks E. The regulation of pinocytosis in mouse macrophages. II. Factors inducing vesicle formation. J Exp Med. 1967 Feb 1;125(2):213–232. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohn Z. A. The structure and function of monocytes and macrophages. Adv Immunol. 1968;9:163–214. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60443-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GLYNN A. A., PARKMAN R. STUDIES WITH AN ANTIBODY TO RAT LYSOZYME. Immunology. 1964 Nov;7:724–729. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordon S., Cohn Z. Macrophage-melanocyte heterokaryons. I. Preparation and properties. J Exp Med. 1970 May 1;131(5):981–1003. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.5.981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gordon S., Cohn Z. Macrophage-melanoma cell heterokaryons. IV. Unmasking the macrophage-specific membrane receptor. J Exp Med. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):947–962. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goud T. J., van Furth R. Proliferative characteristics of monoblasts grown in vitro. J Exp Med. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1200–1217. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Graham R. C., Jr, Karnovsky M. J. The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique. J Histochem Cytochem. 1966 Apr;14(4):291–302. doi: 10.1177/14.4.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HAYASHI M., NAKAJIMA Y., FISHMAN W. H. THE CYTOLOGIC DEMONSTRATION OF BETA-GLUCURONIDASE EMPLOYING NAPHTHOL AS-BI GLUCURONIDE AND HEXAZONIUM PARAROSANILIN; A PRELIMINARY REPORT. J Histochem Cytochem. 1964 Apr;12:293–297. doi: 10.1177/12.4.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ichikawa Y., Pluznik D. H., Sachs L. In vitro control of the development of macrophage and granulocyte colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Aug;56(2):488–495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KAPLOW L. S. SIMPLIFIED MYELOPEROXIDASE STAIN USING BENZIDINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE. Blood. 1965 Aug;26:215–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lay W. H., Nussenzweig V. Receptors for complement of leukocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):991–1009. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leder L. D. The origin of blood monocytes and macrophages. A review. Blut. 1967 Nov;16(2):86–98. doi: 10.1007/BF01632883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lorbacher P., Yam L. T., Mitus W. J. Cytochemical demonstration of beta-glucuronidase activity in blood and bone marrow cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 1967 Aug;15(11):680–687. doi: 10.1177/15.11.680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Messner R. P., Jelinek J. Receptors for human gamma G globulin on human neutrophils. J Clin Invest. 1970 Dec;49(12):2165–2171. doi: 10.1172/JCI106435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Metcalf D. Studies on colony formation in vitro by mouse bone marrow cells. I. Continuous cluster formation and relation of clusters to colonies. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Dec;74(3):323–332. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040740313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Metcalf D. Transformation of granulocytes to macrophages in bone marrow colonies in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 1971 Apr;77(2):277–280. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040770216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Meuret G. Monozytopoese und Kinetik der Blutmonozyten beim Menschen. Blut. 1972 Jun;24(6):337–345. doi: 10.1007/BF01633546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. North R. J. The mitotic potential of fixed phagocytes in the liver as revealed during the development of cellular immunity. J Exp Med. 1969 Aug 1;130(2):315–326. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Novikoff A. B., Goldfischer S. Visualization of peroxisomes (microbodies) and mitochondria with diaminobenzidine. J Histochem Cytochem. 1969 Oct;17(10):675–680. doi: 10.1177/17.10.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pluznik D. H., Sachs L. The cloning of normal "mast" cells in tissue culture. J Cell Physiol. 1965 Dec;66(3):319–324. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030660309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rabinovitch M. Phagocytosis: the engulfment stage. Semin Hematol. 1968 Apr;5(2):134–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson W. A., Bradley T. R., Metcalf D. Effect of whole body irradiation on colony production by bone marrow cells in vitro. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Jun;125(2):388–391. doi: 10.3181/00379727-125-32099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Senn J. S., McCulloch E. A. Radiation sensitivity of human bone marrow cells measured by a cell culture method. Blood. 1970 Jan;35(1):56–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Spector W. G., Coote E. Differentially labelled blood cells in the reaction to paraffin oil. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Oct;90(2):589–598. doi: 10.1002/path.1700900227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Spector W. G., Walters M. N., Willoughby D. A. The origin of the mononuclear cells in inflammatory exudates induced by fibrinogen. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Jul;90(1):181–192. doi: 10.1002/path.1700900119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Uhr J. W. Passive sensitization of lymphocytes and macrophages by antigen-antibody complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Dec;54(6):1599–1606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.6.1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. VOLKMAN A., GOWANS J. L. THE PRODUCTION OF MACROPHAGES IN THE RAT. Br J Exp Pathol. 1965 Feb;46:50–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Furth R., Diesselhoff-den Dulk M. C., Mattie H. Quantitative study on the production and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes during an acute inflammatory reaction. J Exp Med. 1973 Dec 1;138(6):1314–1330. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.6.1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Volkman A. The origin and turnover of mononuclear cells in peritoneal exudates in rats. J Exp Med. 1966 Aug 1;124(2):241–254. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.2.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Warner N. L., Moore M. A., Metcalf D. A transplantable myelomonocytic leukemia in BALB-c mice: cytology, karyotype, and muramidase content. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Oct;43(4):963–982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Worton R. G., McCulloch E. A., Till J. E. Physical separation of hemopoietic stem cells from cells forming colonies in culture. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Oct;74(2):171–182. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040740209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van Furth R., Cohn Z. A. The origin and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Sep 1;128(3):415–435. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. van Furth R., Diesselhoff-Den Dulk M. M. The kinetics of promonocytes and monocytes in the bone marrow. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):813–828. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van Furth R., Hirsch J. G., Fedorko M. E. Morphology and peroxidase cytochemistry of mouse promonocytes, monocytes, and macrophages. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):794–812. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES